scholarly journals Infants’ experience-dependent processing of male and female faces: Insights from eye tracking and event-related potentials

2014 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. 144-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giulia Righi ◽  
Alissa Westerlund ◽  
Eliza L. Congdon ◽  
Sonya Troller-Renfree ◽  
Charles A. Nelson
2008 ◽  
Vol 122 (5) ◽  
pp. 982-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura C. Amann ◽  
Jennifer M. Phillips ◽  
Tobias B. Halene ◽  
Steven J. Siegel

2020 ◽  
Vol 11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Richter ◽  
Mariella Paul ◽  
Barbara Höhle ◽  
Isabell Wartenburger

One of the most important social cognitive skills in humans is the ability to “put oneself in someone else’s shoes,” that is, to take another person’s perspective. In socially situated communication, perspective taking enables the listener to arrive at a meaningful interpretation of what is said (sentence meaning) and what is meant (speaker’s meaning) by the speaker. To successfully decode the speaker’s meaning, the listener has to take into account which information he/she and the speaker share in their common ground (CG). We here further investigated competing accounts about when and how CG information affects language comprehension by means of reaction time (RT) measures, accuracy data, event-related potentials (ERPs), and eye-tracking. Early integration accounts would predict that CG information is considered immediately and would hence not expect to find costs of CG integration. Late integration accounts would predict a rather late and effortful integration of CG information during the parsing process that might be reflected in integration or updating costs. Other accounts predict the simultaneous integration of privileged ground (PG) and CG perspectives. We used a computerized version of the referential communication game with object triplets of different sizes presented visually in CG or PG. In critical trials (i.e., conflict trials), CG information had to be integrated while privileged information had to be suppressed. Listeners mastered the integration of CG (response accuracy 99.8%). Yet, slower RTs, and enhanced late positivities in the ERPs showed that CG integration had its costs. Moreover, eye-tracking data indicated an early anticipation of referents in CG but an inability to suppress looks to the privileged competitor, resulting in later and longer looks to targets in those trials, in which CG information had to be considered. Our data therefore support accounts that foresee an early anticipation of referents to be in CG but a rather late and effortful integration if conflicting information has to be processed. We show that both perspectives, PG and CG, contribute to socially situated language processing and discuss the data with reference to theoretical accounts and recent findings on the use of CG information for reference resolution.


2014 ◽  
Vol 1 (S) ◽  
pp. 35-46
Author(s):  
Laura C. Amann ◽  
Jennifer M. Phillips ◽  
Tobias B. Halene ◽  
Steven J. Siegel

2008 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
pp. 41-57 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anja Roye ◽  
Lea Höfel ◽  
Thomas Jacobsen

Temporal and brain topographic characteristics of the aesthetic judgment of male and female faces were investigated, using event-related potentials and reaction times. The evaluative aesthetic judgment of facial beauty (beautiful vs. not beautiful) was contrasted with a nonevaluative descriptive judgment of head shape (round vs. oval). Analysis showed longer reaction times in the descriptive than in the evaluative task, suggesting that the descriptive judgment demanded more cognitive effort and may entail greater uncertainty. Electrophysiologically, the evaluative judgment elicited a negativity (400 to 480 ms) for the judgment not beautiful, maximal over midline leads. A comparable deflection has been previously reported for evaluative judgments of graphic patterns. It was interpreted as an impression formation independent of the type of stimulus material, occurring when an aesthetic entity is judged intentionally. Besides this effect, which was independent of the gender of the face, the temporal characteristics of aesthetic evaluation differed depending on the gender of the face. We report a negativity for male faces only (280–440 ms) and a late positivity (520–1200 ms), which was stronger for female faces, both concerning not beautiful judgments. Thus, the evaluation of male and female facial beauty was processed in different time-windows. The descriptive judgment round elicited a larger posterior positivity compared with oval (320–620 ms). These results complement investigations of the architecture and time course of evaluative aesthetic and descriptive judgment processes, using faces as stimulus material.


1995 ◽  
Vol 16 (2) ◽  
pp. 145-156 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert Kathmann ◽  
Michael Wagner ◽  
Nicola Rendtorff ◽  
Claudia Schöchlin ◽  
Rolf R. Engel

Author(s):  
Juan-Carlos Rojas ◽  
Manuel Contero ◽  
Jorge D. Camba ◽  
M. Concepción Castellanos ◽  
Eva García-González ◽  
...  

The study of product visual attributes is usually performed through questionnaires which provide information about the conscious subjective opinions of the consumer. This work complements such method by combining Event-Related Potentials (ERP) and Eye-Tracking (ET) techniques and using semantic priming to elicit user perception. Our study focuses on package design and follows the basic structure of classic ERP experiments where participants are presented an ordered sequence of frames (stimuli) in a computer screen for a certain period of time: attention frame, semantic priming frame (descriptive adjective), neutral background, target frame (product image), and a question regarding coherence between priming and target frames. The eye-tracking system works in combination with the ERP experiment. The results of our study reveal the connection between adjectives (semantic priming) and package design attributes (based on the analysis of the N400 ERP component), and the connection between adjectives and the specific visual elements that get more attention (based on the information provided by eye-tracking analysis software).


2007 ◽  
Vol 19 (5) ◽  
pp. 843-854 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. J. Wills ◽  
A. Lavric ◽  
G. S. Croft ◽  
T. L. Hodgson

Prediction error (“surprise”) affects the rate of learning: We learn more rapidly about cues for which we initially make incorrect predictions than cues for which our initial predictions are correct. The current studies employ electrophysiological measures to reveal early attentional differentiation of events that differ in their previous involvement in errors of predictive judgment. Error-related events attract more attention, as evidenced by features of event-related scalp potentials previously implicated in selective visual attention (selection negativity, augmented anterior N1). The earliest differences detected occurred around 120 msec after stimulus onset, and distributed source localization (LORETA) indicated that the inferior temporal regions were one source of the earliest differences. In addition, stimuli associated with the production of prediction errors show higher dwell times in an eye-tracking procedure. Our data support the view that early attentional processes play a role in human associative learning.


2018 ◽  
Vol 26 (6) ◽  
pp. 339-351
Author(s):  
Lixiu Jia ◽  
Yan Tu ◽  
Lili Wang ◽  
Xuefei Zhong ◽  
Ying Wang

2014 ◽  
Vol 67 (3) ◽  
pp. 424-454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan A. Boudewyn ◽  
Megan Zirnstein ◽  
Tamara Y. Swaab ◽  
Matthew J. Traxler

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document