scholarly journals Real-world progression-free survival in first-line advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with immunotherapy-based regimens using a US dataset

Data in Brief ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107195
Author(s):  
David Waterhouse ◽  
Jenny Lam ◽  
Keith A. Betts ◽  
Lei Yin ◽  
Sophie Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Real-world effectiveness of nivolumab in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 16 (27) ◽  
pp. 2045-2058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yong-Jin Kim ◽  
Mark Oremus ◽  
Helen H Chen ◽  
Thomas McFarlane ◽  
Devanshi Shah ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival

Background: The effectiveness of immunotherapies for non-small-cell lung cancer under real-world clinical settings remains uncertain. Materials & methods: Systematic searches of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science were conducted. Random-effects models were used to estimate pooled median overall survival and progression-free survival estimates. Results: 36 studies of nivolumab were included for narrative synthesis and 11 of these studies were included for meta-analysis. Age, sex, histology and prior lines of treatment did not affect survival outcomes, while Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and brain metastasis were inversely associated with survival. In the meta-analysis, nivolumab was associated with 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.4–10.9) of overall survival and 2.6 months (95% CI: 1.6–3.6) of progression-free survival. Conclusion: Very-low-certainty evidence suggested the real-world effectiveness of nivolumab was consistent with those observed in the clinical trials.

scholarly journals Effect of COPD on Inflammation, Lymphoid Functions and Progression-Free Survival during First-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 1117-1128 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márton Szentkereszty ◽  
Zsolt István Komlósi ◽  
Gergő Szűcs ◽  
Gábor Barna ◽  
Lilla Tamási ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Progression-free survival estimates in non-small cell lung cancer when RECIST is unavailable: Project GENIE’s integration of genomic, therapeutic and phenomic data.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9622-9622
Author(s):  
Jessica A. Lavery ◽  
Katherine Panageas ◽  
Michele LeNoue-Newton ◽  
Shawn Sweeney ◽  
Seth Sheffler-Collins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Cancer Centers ◽  
Tumor Profiling

9622 Background: Molecular tumor profiling has become an integral component of oncology practice but linked genomic-phenomic data remain scarce. Recurrence, treatment response and progression are not structured consistently in medical records and this deficit has been a roadblock to discovery of biomarkers that are associated with favorable outcomes. Methods: The Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) consortium is an AACR sponsored project to link and share genomic and phenomic data to promote discovery in precision medicine. 3 cancer centers that routinely perform somatic tumor profiling for advanced cancers agreed to curate anti-neoplastic treatment exposures and outcomes including recurrence, progression, response and survival using a standard method. 6 cancer types (lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, pancreas and bladder) were selected and a REDCAP database captures anti-neoplastic treatments, and specific elements from pathology, radiology and oncology reports. Curators abstract data using data fields that rely on the PRISSMM standard. “Real world” progression free survival (PFS) was identified based on curation of: 1) the text of radiologists’ reports for CT, PET/CT, PET and MRI scans (PFSI) and 2) medical oncologists’ notes (PFSM). PFSI and PFSM were estimated from the start of 1st line anti-neoplastic systemic therapy until progression or death for all patients with molecularly characterized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Results: Genomic sequencing was performed between 2015 and 2017 for 748 patients with NSCLC treated at three major cancer centers. Median age at diagnosis was 66 years (interquartile range 58, 73) and 43% were male. As shown in the table, when RECIST assessments are unavailable, estimates of PFS vary based on whether they are derived from radiologists’ or oncologists’ interpretations. Conclusions: Radiologists’ reports and oncologists’ reports provide different PFS estimates. Cohort studies should specify the method used to define “real world” endpoints. Project GENIE will have 1800 NSCLC patients with curated endpoints by the ASCO meeting. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Study of Gemcitabine Plus Cisplatin or Carboplatin, With or Without Cetuximab, As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (36) ◽  
pp. 5777-5784 ◽  
Author(s):  
Charles A. Butts ◽  
David Bodkin ◽  
Edward L. Middleman ◽  
Craig W. Englund ◽  
David Ellison ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PurposeTo evaluate the efficacy of cetuximab added to first-line gemcitabine/platinum in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).Patients and MethodsIn this noncomparative, randomized trial, chemotherapy-naïve patients with recurrent/metastatic NSCLC (stage IV or stage IIIB with malignant pleural effusion) were eligible. Patients received cisplatin (75 mg/m2IV, every 3 weeks) or carboplatin (area under the concentration-versus-time curve of 5 intravenously [IV], every 3 weeks), and gemcitabine (1,250 or 1,000 mg/m2IV, days 1 and 8) plus cetuximab (400 mg/m2IV day 1, followed by 250 mg/m2weekly), in arm A, or chemotherapy alone, in arm B. Response rate was the primary end point; safety, progression-free survival, and overall survival were secondary end points.ResultsSixty-five patients were randomly assigned to arm A and 66 to arm B. Partial responses were observed in 18 patients (27.7%; 95% CI, 17.3 to 40.2) in arm A and 12 (18.2%; 95% CI, 9.8 to 29.6) in arm B. Median progression-free survival was 5.09 months for arm A (95% CI, 4.17 to 5.98) and 4.21 months (95% CI, 3.81 to 5.49) in arm B. Median overall survival was 11.99 months (95% CI, 8.80 to 15.18) and 9.26 months (95% CI, 7.43 to 11.79) in arms A and B, respectively. Overall toxicity was acceptable and consistent with the profiles of the individual agents.ConclusionFirst-line treatment with cetuximab plus gemcitabine/platinum is well tolerated and can be administered safely in patients with advanced NSCLC. Differences in response rate, progression-free survival, and overall survival suggest that the addition of cetuximab to platinum/gemcitabine may improve clinical outcomes. Larger studies are in progress to address this hypothesis.

Systematic review and network meta-analysis of first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer

2019 ◽  
Vol 15 (24) ◽  
pp. 2857-2871 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jacob Franek ◽  
Joseph C Cappelleri ◽  
Kelly A Larkin-Kaiser ◽  
Keith D Wilner ◽  
Rickard Sandin
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Efficacy ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

Here, we compare the relative clinical efficacy of EGFR-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors ( EGFR TKIs) for EGFR-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The authors systematically searched 11 electronic databases from January 2004 to August 2018 for randomized controlled trials measuring clinical efficacy of first-line TKI therapies. Clinical efficacy outcomes included overall survival and progression-free survival. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to assess the relative efficacy of first-line EGFR TKIs for overall survival and progression-free survival. This network meta-analysis showed that dacomitinib and osimertinib resulted in improved efficacy outcomes compared with afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib. Both osimertinib and dacomitinib should be considered as standard first-line treatment options for patients diagnosed with advanced EGFR-positive non-small-cell lung cancer.

scholarly journals Updated Analysis From KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab or Placebo Plus Pemetrexed and Platinum for Previously Untreated Metastatic Nonsquamous Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (14) ◽  
pp. 1505-1517 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shirish Gadgeel ◽  
Delvys Rodríguez-Abreu ◽  
Giovanna Speranza ◽  
Emilio Esteban ◽  
Enriqueta Felip ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Combination Group ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival

PURPOSE In KEYNOTE-189, first-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum significantly improved overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo plus pemetrexed-platinum in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non‒small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), irrespective of tumor programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression. We report an updated analysis from KEYNOTE-189 (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02578680 ). METHODS Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive pemetrexed and platinum plus pembrolizumab (n = 410) or placebo (n = 206) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, then pemetrexed maintenance plus pembrolizumab or placebo for up to a total of 35 cycles. Eligible patients with disease progression in the placebo-combination group could cross over to pembrolizumab monotherapy. Response was assessed per RECIST (version 1.1) by central review. No alpha was assigned to this updated analysis. RESULTS As of September 21, 2018 (median follow-up, 23.1 months), the updated median (95% CI) OS was 22.0 (19.5 to 25.2) months in the pembrolizumab-combination group versus 10.7 (8.7 to 13.6) months in the placebo-combination group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45 to 0.70]). Median (95% CI) PFS was 9.0 (8.1 to 9.9) months and 4.9 (4.7 to 5.5) months, respectively (HR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.58). Median (95% CI) time from randomization to objective tumor progression on next-line treatment or death from any cause, whichever occurred first (progression-free-survival-2; PFS-2) was 17.0 (15.1 to 19.4) months and 9.0 (7.6 to 10.4) months, respectively (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.59). OS and PFS benefits with pembrolizumab were observed regardless of PD-L1 expression or presence of liver/brain metastases. Incidence of grade 3-5 adverse events was similar in the pembrolizumab-combination (71.9%) and placebo-combination (66.8%) groups. CONCLUSION First-line pembrolizumab plus pemetrexed-platinum continued to demonstrate substantially improved OS and PFS in metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC, regardless of PD-L1 expression or liver/brain metastases, with manageable safety and tolerability.

Clinical effectiveness outcomes and healthcare resource utilization of patients diagnosed with small-cell lung cancer

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Junji Lin ◽  
Santosh Gautam ◽  
Nan Hu ◽  
Gboyega Adeboyeje ◽  
Sumesh Kachroo
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Real World ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Study Results

Background: Real-world data are lacking on patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) with extensive-stage SCLC (eSCLC) and poor performance status (PS). Patients & methods: Eligible patients diagnosed with eSCLC between 1 January 2008 and 31 December 2017 were included in this retrospective, observational study. Results: The study included 406 patients, with 14.3% impaired PS. Progression-free survival and overall survival were not significantly different between impaired (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ≥2) and not impaired patients (median, 4.5 vs 5.3 months, and 7.2 vs 8.4 months, respectively). Impaired patients used more supportive care drugs (mean, 3.0 vs 2.0; p = 0.033). Conclusion: Effectiveness outcomes among patients with and without impaired PS did not differ in the real-world setting. Progression-free survival and overall survival were similar to data from clinical trials.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document