Cyst carcinoembryonic antigen in differentiating pancreatic cysts: A meta-analysis

2013 ◽  
Vol 45 (11) ◽  
pp. 920-926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Saowanee Ngamruengphong ◽  
Michael J. Bartel ◽  
Massimo Raimondo
2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (26) ◽  
pp. 3450-3467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Faias ◽  
Luisa Pereira ◽  
Ângelo Luís ◽  
Paula Chaves ◽  
Marília Cravo

2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. E656-E667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donevan R. Westerveld ◽  
Sandeep A. Ponniah ◽  
Peter V. Draganov ◽  
Dennis Yang

Abstract Background and study aims Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of pancreatic cysts (PCs) is challenging. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) versus fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in PCs. Methods Comprehensive search of databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science) for relevant studies on TTNB of PCs (from inception to June 2019). The primary outcome was to compare the pooled diagnostic yield and concordance rate with surgical pathology of TTNB histology and FNA cytology of PCs. The secondary outcome was to estimate the safety profile of TTNB. Results: Eight studies (426 patients) were included. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher with TTNB over FNA for a specific cyst type (OR: 9.4; 95 % CI: [5.7–15.4]; I2 = 48) or a mucinous cyst (MC) (OR: 3.9; 95 % CI: [2.0–7.4], I2 = 72 %). The concordance rate with surgical pathology was significantly higher with TTNB over FNA for a specific cyst type (OR: 13.5; 95 % CI: [3.5–52.3]; I2 = 48), for a MC (OR: 8.9; 95 % [CI: 1.9–40.8]; I2 = 29), and for MC histologic severity (OR: 10.4; 95 % CI: [2.9–36.9]; I2 = 0). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of TTNB for MCs were 90.1 % (95 % CI: [78.4–97.6]; I2 = 36.5 %) and 94 % (95 % CI: [81.5–99.7]; I2 = 0), respectively. The pooled adverse event rate was 7.0 % (95 % CI: [2.3–14.1]; I2 = 82.9). Conclusions TTNB is safe, has a high sensitivity and specificity for MCs and may be superior to FNA cytology in risk-stratifying MCs and providing a specific cyst diagnosis.


2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 ◽  
pp. 1-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuan Li ◽  
Danian Dai ◽  
Bo Chen ◽  
Hailin Tang ◽  
Xiaoming Xie ◽  
...  

Purpose. The prognostic role of serum cancer antigen 15-3 (CA15-3) and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in breast cancer remains controversial. In this study, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the prognostic value of these two markers in breast cancer patients.Methods. After electronic databases were searched, 36 studies (31 including information regarding CA15-3 and 23 including information regarding CEA) with 12,993 subjects were included. Based on the data directly or indirectly from the available studies, the hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios (ORs) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled according to higher or lower marker levels.Results. Elevated CA15-3 or CEA was statistically significant with poorer DFS and OS in breast cancer (multivariate analysis of OS: HR = 2.03, 95% CI 1.76–2.33 for CA15-3; HR = 1.79, 95% CI 1.46–2.20 for CEA; multivariate analysis of DFS: HR = 1.56, 95% CI 1.06–1.55 for CA15-3; HR = 1.77, 95% CI 1.53–2.04 for CEA). Subgroup analysis showed that CA15-3 or CEA had significant predictive values in primary or metastasis types and different cut-offs and included sample sizes and even the study publication year. Furthermore, elevated CA15-3 was associated with advanced histological grade and younger age, while elevated CEA was related to the non-triple-negative tumor type and older age. These two elevated markers were all associated with a higher tumor burden.Conclusions. This meta-analysis showed that elevated serum CA15-3 or CEA was associated with poor DFS and OS in patients with breast cancer, and they should be tested anytime if possible.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-475
Author(s):  
Ankit Chhoda ◽  
Sidhant Singh ◽  
Amar H. Sheth ◽  
Prabin Sharma ◽  
Anup Sharma ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Lei Li ◽  
Chen Guo ◽  
Jin-Liang Wan ◽  
Qing-Shuai Fan ◽  
Xiao-Liang Xu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document