scholarly journals Genetic testing vs microforceps biopsy in pancreatic cysts: Systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (26) ◽  
pp. 3450-3467 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sandra Faias ◽  
Luisa Pereira ◽  
Ângelo Luís ◽  
Paula Chaves ◽  
Marília Cravo
2020 ◽  
Vol 08 (05) ◽  
pp. E656-E667 ◽  
Author(s):  
Donevan R. Westerveld ◽  
Sandeep A. Ponniah ◽  
Peter V. Draganov ◽  
Dennis Yang

Abstract Background and study aims Accurate diagnosis and risk stratification of pancreatic cysts (PCs) is challenging. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the feasibility, safety, and diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided through-the-needle biopsy (TTNB) versus fine-needle aspiration (FNA) in PCs. Methods Comprehensive search of databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, Web of Science) for relevant studies on TTNB of PCs (from inception to June 2019). The primary outcome was to compare the pooled diagnostic yield and concordance rate with surgical pathology of TTNB histology and FNA cytology of PCs. The secondary outcome was to estimate the safety profile of TTNB. Results: Eight studies (426 patients) were included. The diagnostic yield was significantly higher with TTNB over FNA for a specific cyst type (OR: 9.4; 95 % CI: [5.7–15.4]; I2 = 48) or a mucinous cyst (MC) (OR: 3.9; 95 % CI: [2.0–7.4], I2 = 72 %). The concordance rate with surgical pathology was significantly higher with TTNB over FNA for a specific cyst type (OR: 13.5; 95 % CI: [3.5–52.3]; I2 = 48), for a MC (OR: 8.9; 95 % [CI: 1.9–40.8]; I2 = 29), and for MC histologic severity (OR: 10.4; 95 % CI: [2.9–36.9]; I2 = 0). The pooled sensitivity and specificity of TTNB for MCs were 90.1 % (95 % CI: [78.4–97.6]; I2 = 36.5 %) and 94 % (95 % CI: [81.5–99.7]; I2 = 0), respectively. The pooled adverse event rate was 7.0 % (95 % CI: [2.3–14.1]; I2 = 82.9). Conclusions TTNB is safe, has a high sensitivity and specificity for MCs and may be superior to FNA cytology in risk-stratifying MCs and providing a specific cyst diagnosis.


2021 ◽  
Vol 160 (6) ◽  
pp. S-475
Author(s):  
Ankit Chhoda ◽  
Sidhant Singh ◽  
Amar H. Sheth ◽  
Prabin Sharma ◽  
Anup Sharma ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 159 ◽  
pp. 251-252
Author(s):  
X. Li ◽  
R.M. Kahn ◽  
A.I. Lackner ◽  
B. Baltich Nelson ◽  
H. Krinsky ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaorong Guo ◽  
Xianbao Zhan ◽  
Zhaoshen Li

Background. Researchers have evaluated various molecular tests for improving the differential diagnosis of cystic lesions of the pancreas.Methods. Six electronic databases were searched for articles on molecular tests for the diagnosis of pancreatic cysts. Measures of accuracy were extracted from selected articles and pooled by the random-effects model. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves were used to analyze the overall accuracy of the molecular tests. Pooled sensitivity and specificity values [95% confidence intervals] are reported.Results. The systematic review included eight studies of 428 patients in total. We determined the sensitivities and specificities of tests forKRASmutations (0.47 [0.39–0.54], 0.98 [0.93–0.99]) and loss of heterozygosity (0.63 [0.54–0.71], 0.76 [0.63–0.87]) for distinguishing mucinous from nonmucinous cysts, as well as the sensitivities and specificities of tests forKRASmutations (0.59 [0.46–0.71], 0.78 [0.71–0.85]) and loss of heterozygosity (0.89 [0.78–0.96], 0.69 [0.60–0.76]) for differentiating malignant from benign cysts.Conclusion. Tests ofKRASmutations could confirm but not exclude a diagnosis of a mucinous or malignant pancreatic cyst.


2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (3) ◽  
pp. 193-199 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manasa Kandula ◽  
Harsha Moole ◽  
Michael Cashman ◽  
Fritz H. Volmar ◽  
Matthew L. Bechtold ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Abdul Rahman Ramdzan ◽  
Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim ◽  
Aznida Mohamad Zaki ◽  
Zuraidah Zaidun ◽  
Azmawati Mohammed Nawi

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 374-374
Author(s):  
Ravi Sharaf ◽  
Parvathi Myer ◽  
Christopher Stave ◽  
Lisa Diamond ◽  
Uri Ladabaum

374 Background: Screening of persons with newly diagnosed colorectal cancer (CRC) for Lynch Syndrome (LS) can yield substantial population-level benefits at acceptable costs, presuming sufficient uptake of genetic testing by first-degree relatives (FDRs) of LS probands. We reviewed systematically the published literature addressing the frequency and predictors of uptake of genetic testing by FDRs of LS probands. Methods: A literature search was conducted in four electronic databases (CINAHL, PsycInfo, PUBMED, and SCOPUS) for articles published through May 2011 that reported the uptake of genetic testing by relatives of LS probands. Two investigators independently screened articles to determine whether they met inclusion criteria, and abstracted data inthree broad categories: study population, methodology, and uptake of genetic testing. A narrative, qualitative systematic review was performed. The data were not amenable to meta-analysis. Results: 1,258 potentially relevant articles were identified with 533 studies undergoing full text review. Eight articles met inclusion criteria. 52% or less of FDRs of LS probands underwent genetic testing. For each LS proband, 4.6 or fewer relatives underwent genetic testing. Demographic factors (age <50 years, female gender, parenthood, education level, employment, participation in past medical studies), psychological factors (lack of depressive symptoms), and family history (greater number of relatives with cancer) were associated with uptake of genetic testing. Conclusions: Genetic testing may be underutilized by FDRs at risk for LS. The economic feasibility of screening persons with CRC for LS depends on optimizing family-wide uptake of genetic testing. Future research and clinical efforts should focus on ways to overcome barriers to genetic testing.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document