scholarly journals Interaction of Ddc1 and RPA with single-stranded/double-stranded DNA junctions in yeast whole cell extracts: Proteolytic degradation of the large subunit of replication protein A in ddc1Δ strains

DNA Repair ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 22 ◽  
pp. 30-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria V. Sukhanova ◽  
Claudine D’Herin ◽  
Serge Boiteux ◽  
Olga I. Lavrik
1996 ◽  
Vol 259 (1) ◽  
pp. 104-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kai Treuner ◽  
Uwe Ramsperger ◽  
Rolf Knippers

2006 ◽  
Vol 281 (38) ◽  
pp. 27855-27861 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerzy Majka ◽  
Sara K. Binz ◽  
Marc S. Wold ◽  
Peter M. J. Burgers

1997 ◽  
Vol 17 (7) ◽  
pp. 3536-3546 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Gailus-Durner ◽  
C Chintamaneni ◽  
R Wilson ◽  
S J Brill ◽  
A K Vershon

URS1 is a transcriptional repressor site found in the promoters of a wide variety of yeast genes that are induced under stress conditions. In the context of meiotic promoters, URS1 sites act as repressor sequences during mitosis and function as activator sites during meiosis. We have investigated the sequence requirements of the URS1 site of the meiosis-specific HOP1 gene (URS1H) and have found differences compared with a URS1 site from a nonmeiotic gene. We have also observed that the sequence specificity for meiotic activation at this site differs from that for mitotic repression. Base pairs flanking the conserved core sequence enhance meiotic induction but are not required for mitotic repression of HOP1. Electrophoretic mobility shift assays of mitotic and meiotic cell extracts show a complex pattern of DNA-protein complexes, suggesting that several different protein factors bind specifically to the site. We have determined that one of the complexes of URS1H is formed by replication protein A (RPA). Although RPA binds to the double-stranded URS1H site in vitro, it has much higher affinity for single-stranded than for double-stranded URS1H, and one-hybrid assays suggest that RPA does not bind to this site at detectable levels in vivo. In addition, conditional-lethal mutations in RPA were found to have no effect on URS1H-mediated repression. These results suggest that although RPA binds to URS1H in vitro, it does not appear to have a functional role in transcriptional repression through this site in vivo.


1998 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 3182-3190 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vesna RapićOtrin ◽  
Isao Kuraoka ◽  
Tiziana Nardo ◽  
Mary McLenigan ◽  
A. P. M. Eker ◽  
...  

ABSTRACT Cells from complementation groups A through G of the heritable sun-sensitive disorder xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) show defects in nucleotide excision repair of damaged DNA. Proteins representing groups A, B, C, D, F, and G are subunits of the core recognition and incision machinery of repair. XP group E (XP-E) is the mildest form of the disorder, and cells generally show about 50% of the normal repair level. We investigated two protein factors previously implicated in the XP-E defect, UV-damaged DNA binding protein (UV-DDB) and replication protein A (RPA). Three newly identified XP-E cell lines (XP23PV, XP25PV, and a line formerly classified as an XP variant) were defective in UV-DDB binding activity but had levels of RPA in the normal range. The XP-E cell extracts did not display a significant nucleotide excision repair defect in vitro, with either UV-irradiated DNA or a uniquely placed cisplatin lesion used as a substrate. Purified UV-DDB protein did not stimulate repair of naked DNA by DDB− XP-E cell extracts, but microinjection of the protein into DDB−XP-E cells could partially correct the repair defect. RPA stimulated repair in normal, XP-E, or complemented extracts from other XP groups, and so the effect of RPA was not specific for XP-E cell extracts. These data strengthen the connection between XP-E and UV-DDB. Coupled with previous results, the findings suggest that UV-DDB has a role in the repair of DNA in chromatin.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document