Treatment of Acute Bony Avulsion of Ischial Tuberosity With Cortical Screw Fixation

Objectives The aim of this study was to describe a screw fixation method of the tibial tuberosity after transposition during surgical treatment of patellar luxation and to report complications and outcome of the procedure. Materials and Methods Medical records (2010–2016) of dogs treated for patellar luxation with tibial tuberosity transposition stabilization using a cortical bone screw placed adjacent to the tuberosity were retrospectively reviewed. Radiographs acquired immediately after surgery were evaluated for fissures. Proximal tibial dimensions and tibial tuberosity segments were measured. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Results One-hundred and six dogs and 131 stifle surgeries were included. Implant complications associated with the screw occurred in 2/106 dogs (1.9%). Two dogs developed tibial tuberosity fracture and proximal displacement within 1 week of surgery and required stabilization with pin and tension band. Patellar reluxation rate following surgery was 6.9% (9/131 procedures). Presence of a fissure on postoperative radiographs increased the odds of tibial tuberosity fracture development (p < 0.001), while greater tibial tuberosity size (p = 0.023) and larger distal cortical attachment (p = 0.018) decreased the odds of fissure formation. Clinical significance Tibial tuberosity transposition can be achieved with a cortical screw placed lateral or medial to the tibial tuberosity.

Download Full-text

A 3-D CT Analysis of Screw and Suture-Button Fixation of the Syndesmosis

Foot & Ankle International ◽

10.1177/1071100716673590 ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 38 (2) ◽

pp. 208-214 ◽

Cited By ~ 18

Author(s):

Jason M. Schon ◽

Brady T. Williams ◽

Melanie B. Venderley ◽

Grant J. Dornan ◽

Jonathon D. Backus ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Screw Fixation ◽

Joint Space ◽

Intact State ◽

Suture Button ◽

Repair Technique ◽

Cortical Screw ◽

Tibiofibular Joint ◽

Ct Analysis ◽

Mean Differences ◽

Repair Techniques

Background: Historically, syndesmosis injuries have been repaired with screw fixation; however, some suggest that suture-button constructs may provide a more accurate anatomic and physiologic reduction. The purpose of this study was to compare changes in the volume of the syndesmotic space following screw or suture-button fixation using a preinjury and postoperative 3-D computed tomography (CT) model. The null hypothesis was that no difference would be observed among repair techniques. Methods: Twelve pairs of cadaveric specimens were dissected to identify the syndesmotic ligaments. Specimens were imaged with CT prior to the creation of a complete syndesmosis injury and were subsequently repaired using 1 of 3 randomly assigned techniques: (a) one 3.5-mm cortical screw, (b) 1 suture-button, and (c) 2 suture-buttons. Specimens were imaged postoperatively with CT. 3-D models of all scans and tibiofibular joint space volumes were calculated to assess restoration of the native syndesmosis. Analysis of variance and Tukey’s method were used to compare least squares mean differences from the intact syndesmosis among repair techniques. Results: For each of the 3 fixation methods, the total postoperative syndesmosis volume was significantly decreased relative to the intact state. The total mean decreases in volume compared with the intact state for the 1-suture-button construct, 2-suture-button construct, and syndesmotic screw were −561 mm3 (95% CI, −878 to −244), −964 mm3 (95% CI, −1281 to −647) and −377 mm3 (95% CI, −694 to −60), respectively. Conclusion: All repairs notably reduced the volume of the syndesmosis beyond the intact state. Fixation with 1 suture-button was not significantly different from screw or 2-suture-button fixation; however, fixation with 2 suture-buttons resulted in significantly decreased volume compared with screw fixation. Clinical Relevance: The results of this study suggest that the 1-suture-button repair technique and the screw fixation repair technique were comparable for reduction of syndesmosis injuries, although both may overcompress the syndesmosis.

Download Full-text

Restoration of Tibiofibular Kinematics with a Tricortical Screw or Suture Button Fixation After Syndesmotic Ankle Injuries

Foot & Ankle Orthopaedics ◽

10.1177/2473011417s000063 ◽

2017 ◽

Vol 2 (3) ◽

pp. 2473011417S0000

Author(s):

Conor Murphy ◽

Thomas Pfeiffer ◽

Jason Zlotnicki ◽

Volker Musahl ◽

Richard Debski ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Screw Fixation ◽

External Rotation ◽

Tracking System ◽

Optical Tracking ◽

Ankle Injuries ◽

Suture Button ◽

Tibiofibular Ligament ◽

Cortical Screw ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Posterior Translation

Category: Ankle, Sports, Trauma Introduction/Purpose: Anterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (AITFL), Posterior inferior tibiofibular ligament (PITFL) and Interosseous membrane (IOM) disruption is a predictive measure of residual symptoms after ankle injury. In unstable injuries, the syndesmosis is treated operatively with cortical screw fixation or a suture button apparatus. Biomechanical analyses of suture button versus cortical screw fixation methods show contradicting results regarding suture button integrity and maintenance of fixation. The objective of this study is to quantify tibiofibular joint motion in syndesmotic screw and suture button fixation models compared to the intact ankle. Methods: Five fresh-frozen human cadaveric specimens (mean age 58 yrs.; range 38-73 yrs.) were tested using a 6-degree-of- freedom robotic testing system. The tibia and calcaneus were rigidly fixed to the robotic manipulator and the subtalar joint was fused. The full fibular length was maintained and fibular motion was unconstrained. Fibular motion with respect to the tibia was tracked by a 3D optical tracking system. A 5 Nm external rotation moment and 5 Nm inversion moment were applied to the ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion. Outcome variables included fibular medial-lateral (ML) translation, anterior-posterior (AP) translation, and external rotation (ER) in the following states: 1) intact ankle, 2) AITFL transected, 3) PITFL and IOM transected, 4) 3.5 mm cannulated tricortical screw fixation, 5) suture button fixation. An ANOVA with a post-hoc Tukey analysis was performed for statistical analysis (*p<0.05). Results: Significant differences in fibular motion were only during the inversion moment. Fibular posterior translation was significantly higher with complete syndesmosis injury compared to the intact ankle at 0°, 15°, and 30° plantarflexion and the tricortical screw at 15° and 30°. Significantly higher fibular posterior translation was observed with the suture button compared to the intact ankle at 15° and 30 plantarflexion and to the tricortical screw at 15°. ER was significantly increased with complete injury compared to the tricortical screw at 0° and 30° plantarflexion. The suture button demonstrated significantly greater ER at 0° plantarflexion and 10° dorsiflexion compared to the intact ankle. The only significant difference in ML translation exists between the tricortical screw and complete injury at 30° plantarflexion. Conclusion: The suture button did not restore physiologic motion of the syndesmosis. It only restored fibular ML translation. Significant differences in AP translation and ER persisted compared to the intact ankle. The tricortical screw restored fibular motion in all planes. No significant differences were observed compared to the intact ankle. These findings are consistent with previous studies. This study utilized a novel setup to measure unconstrained motion in a full length, intact fibula. Physicians should evaluate AP translation and ER as critical fibular motions when reconstructing the syndesmosis with suture button fixation.

Download Full-text