Environmental cost–benefit analysis of alternative timing strategies in greenhouse gas abatement: A data envelopment analysis approach

2009 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 1633-1642 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Kuosmanen ◽  
Neil Bijsterbosch ◽  
Rob Dellink
Keyword(s):  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Greenhouse Gas ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Environmental Cost ◽  
Analysis Approach ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Greenhouse Gas Abatement ◽  
Timing Strategies

scholarly journals Efisiensi penggunaan alat tangkap

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Safri Usman
Keyword(s):  
Data Envelopment Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
Benefit Analysis

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui efisiensi teknis alat tangkap handline dan alokatif efisiensi (harga) alat tangkap handline serta efisiensi ekonomis alat tangkap handline di Desa Kayubulan Kabupaten Batudaa Provinsi Gorontalo., Penelitian ini menggunakan deskriptif kuantitatif analisis data dengan menggunakan DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) untuk mengukur efisiensi teknis dan CBA (Cost Benefit Analysis) untuk mengukur efisiensi alokatif (harga) dan analisisefisiensi ekonomi adalah hasil dari efisiensi teknis dan efisiensi alokatif (harga)

scholarly journals Dr Torben Holvad

2021 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 11-13
Author(s):  
Aránzazu Berbey Álvarez
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Quantitative Methods ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Multicriteria Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Data Envelopment ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Transport Economics ◽  
European University

Torben Holvad is Analysis Team Leader at the European Union Agency for Railways (France). He obtained Economics degrees from Copenhagen University (MSc) and the European University Institute in Florence (PhD). He has more than 30 years of experience in applied economic analysis. His skills and expertise correspond to backgrounds like: Quantitative methods, Data Envelopment Analysis, Impact Assessment, Cost Benefit Analysis, Transport Economics, Multicriteria analysis, Economics of regulation, Data analysis, Health economics.

The Use of Cost-Benefit Analysis to Decide Environmental Policy – a Dead End?

1997 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 185-208
Author(s):  
Hege Westskog
Keyword(s):  
Environmental Policy ◽  
Decision Maker ◽  
Cost Benefit Analysis ◽  
Cost Benefit ◽  
Environmental Cost ◽  
Benefit Analysis ◽  
Ethical Foundation ◽  
Ethical Beliefs ◽  
Individual Preferences ◽  
Dead End

In this paper I discuss two questions which the decision maker has to consider before she makes use of the method of cost benefit analysis. First, she has to ask herself if she shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost benefit analysis. If not, could environmental cost benefit analysis be adjusted such that her ethical beliefs are incorporated? Second, if the decision maker shares the ethical foundation of environmental cost-benefit analysis, is this method appropriate when there are individuals in a society that hold other ethical beliefs than those implicitly assumed in an environmental cost-benefit analysis? When discussing these questions I focus on two different perspectives – the deontological and the agency aspect of individual preferences. I argue that the answer to both questions is «no», though the answer to the second question is not as clear as the answer to the first.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document