Lag optimisation and finite-sample size distortion of unit root tests

2004 ◽  
Vol 84 (2) ◽  
pp. 267-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Cook ◽  
Neil Manning
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Unit Root ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Size Distortion ◽  
Finite Sample Size

scholarly journals Finite-Sample Properties of the GLS-Based Dickey-Fuller Test in the Presence of Breaks in Innovation Variance

2016 ◽  
Vol 33 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Steven Cook
Keyword(s):  
Sample Size ◽  
Unit Root ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Higher Power ◽  
Finite Sample Properties ◽  
Innovation Variance ◽  
Finite Sample Size

Using local-to-unity detrending, the GLS-based Dickey-Fuller test has been shown to possess higher power than other available unit root tests. As a result, application of this easily implemented test has increased in recent years. In the present study the finite-sample size and power of the GLS-based Dickey-Fuller test is examined in the presence of breaks in innovation variance under the null. In contrast to the original Dickey-Fuller test which has been shown to suffer severe distortion in such circumstances, the GLS-basedtest latter exhibits robustness to all but the most extreme breaks in variance.The results derived show the GLS-based test to be more robust to variance breaks than other modified Dickey-Fuller tests previously considered in the literature.

Near Observational Equivalence and Theoretical size Problems with Unit Root Tests

1996 ◽  
Vol 12 (4) ◽  
pp. 724-731 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jon Faust
Keyword(s):  
Unit Root ◽  
Sufficient Conditions ◽  
Unit Root Test ◽  
Asymptotic Distributions ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Test Procedures ◽  
Asymptotic Size ◽  
Finite Sample Size ◽  
Topological Sense

Said and Dickey (1984,Biometrika71, 599–608) and Phillips and Perron (1988,Biometrika75, 335–346) have derived unit root tests that have asymptotic distributions free of nuisance parameters under very general maintained models. Under models as general as those assumed by these authors, the size of the unit root test procedures will converge to one, not the size under the asymptotic distribution. Solving this problem requires restricting attention to a model that is small, in a topological sense, relative to the original. Sufficient conditions for solving the asymptotic size problem yield some suggestions for improving finite-sample size performance of standard tests.

A family of nonparametric unit root tests for processes driven by infinite variance innovations

2021 ◽  
Vol 0 (0) ◽  
Author(s):  
Kemal Caglar Gogebakan
Keyword(s):  
Unit Root ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Tuning Parameter ◽  
Infinite Variance ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Power Performance ◽  
Finite Sample Size ◽  
Heavy Tailed ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Adf Test

Abstract This paper presents extensions to the family of nonparametric fractional variance ratio (FVR) unit root tests of Nielsen (2009. “A Powerful Test of the Autoregressive Unit Root Hypothesis Based on a Tuning Parameter Free Statistic.” Econometric Theory 25: 1515–44) under heavy tailed (infinite variance) innovations. In this regard, we first develop the asymptotic theory for these FVR tests under this setup. We show that the limiting distributions of the tests are free of serial correlation nuisance parameters, but depend on the tail index of the infinite variance process. Then, we compare the finite sample size and power performance of our FVR unit root tests with the well-known parametric ADF test under the impact of the heavy tailed shocks. Simulations demonstrate that under heavy tailed innovations, the nonparametric FVR tests have desirable size and power properties.

scholarly journals SEMI-PARAMETRIC SEASONAL UNIT ROOT TESTS

2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 447-476 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomás del Barrio Castro ◽  
Paulo M.M. Rodrigues ◽  
A.M. Robert Taylor
Keyword(s):  
Unit Root ◽  
Moving Average ◽  
Size Control ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Oxford University ◽  
Finite Sample Size ◽  
Carry Over ◽  
Image Position ◽  
Economic Studies

We extend the ${\cal M}$ class of unit root tests introduced by Stock (1999, Cointegration, Causality and Forecasting. A Festschrift in Honour of Clive W.J. Granger. Oxford University Press), Perron and Ng (1996, Review of Economic Studies 63, 435–463) and Ng and Perron (2001, Econometrica 69, 1519–1554) to the seasonal case, thereby developing semi-parametric alternatives to the regression-based augmented seasonal unit root tests of Hylleberg, Engle, Granger, and Yoo (1990, Journal of Econometrics 44, 215–238). The success of this class of unit root tests to deliver good finite sample size control even in the most problematic (near-cancellation) case where the shocks contain a strong negative moving average component is shown to carry over to the seasonal case as is the superior size/power trade-off offered by these tests relative to other available tests.

ASYMPTOTICALLY UMP PANEL UNIT ROOT TESTS—THE EFFECT OF HETEROGENEITY IN THE ALTERNATIVES

2014 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 539-559 ◽  
Author(s):  
I. Gaia Becheri ◽  
Feike C. Drost ◽  
Ramon van den Akker
Keyword(s):  
Unit Root ◽  
Generalized Least Squares ◽  
Applied Economics ◽  
Unit Root Tests ◽  
Finite Sample ◽  
Asymptotic Power ◽  
Optimal Tests ◽  
Independent Panel ◽  
Local Asymptotic Power ◽  
Uniformly Most Powerful

In a Gaussian, heterogeneous, cross-sectionally independent panel with incidental intercepts, Moon, Perron, and Phillips (2007, Journal of Econometrics 141, 416–459) present an asymptotic power envelope yielding an upper bound to the local asymptotic power of unit root tests. In case of homogeneous alternatives this envelope is known to be sharp, but this paper shows that it is not attainable for heterogeneous alternatives. Using limit experiment theory we derive a sharp power envelope. We also demonstrate that, among others, one of the likelihood ratio based tests in Moon et al. (2007, Journal of Econometrics 141, 416–459), a pooled generalized least squares (GLS) based test using the Breitung and Meyer (1994, Applied Economics 25, 353–361) device, and a new test based on the asymptotic structure of the model are all asymptotically UMP (Uniformly Most Powerful). Thus, perhaps somewhat surprisingly, pooled regression-based tests may yield optimal tests in case of heterogeneous alternatives. Although finite-sample powers are comparable, the new test is easy to implement and has superior size properties.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document