scholarly journals Techno-economic evaluation of the coal-based integrated gasification combined cycle with CO2 capture and storage technology

2009 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 4089-4093 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Nagumo ◽  
Shingo Kazama ◽  
Yuichi Fujioka
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Co2 Capture And Storage ◽  
Storage Technology ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
And Storage

Comparison of Preanode and Postanode Carbon Dioxide Separation for IGFC Systems

2010 ◽  
Vol 132 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Eric Liese
Keyword(s):  
Fuel Cell ◽  
Power Density ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Coal Gasification ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Energy Technology ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Lower Efficiency ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Cold Gas

This paper examines the arrangement of a solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) within a coal gasification cycle, this combination generally being called an integrated gasification fuel cell cycle. This work relies on a previous study performed by the National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL) that details thermodynamic simulations of integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) systems and considers various gasifier types and includes cases for 90% CO2 capture (2007, “Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Vol. 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity,” National Energy Technology Laboratory Report No. DOE/NETL-2007/1281). All systems in this study assume a Conoco Philips gasifier and cold-gas clean up conditions for the coal gasification system (Cases 3 and 4 in the NETL IGCC report). Four system arrangements, cases, are examined. Cases 1 and 2 remove the CO2 after the SOFC anode. Case 3 assumes steam addition, a water-gas-shift (WGS) catalyst, and a Selexol process to remove the CO2 in the gas cleanup section, sending a hydrogen-rich gas to the fuel cell anode. Case 4 assumes Selexol in the cold-gas cleanup section as in Case 3; however, there is no steam addition, and the WGS takes places in the SOFC and after the anode. Results demonstrate significant efficiency advantages compared with IGCC with CO2 capture. The hydrogen-rich case (Case 3) has better net electric efficiency compared with typical postanode CO2 capture cases (Cases 1 and 2), with a simpler arrangement but at a lower SOFC power density, or a lower efficiency at the same power density. Case 4 gives an efficiency similar to Case 3 but also at a lower SOFC power density. Carbon deposition concerns are also discussed.

Policies and Incentives Developments in CO2 Capture and Storage Technology

2005 ◽  
pp. 17-35
Author(s):  
Arthur Lee ◽  
Dag Christensen ◽  
Frede Cappelen ◽  
Jan Hartog ◽  
Alison Thompson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Co2 Capture And Storage ◽  
Storage Technology ◽  
And Storage

Modeling of Ultra Superheated Steam Gasification in Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle Power Plant With Carbon Dioxide Capture

2008 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Pei ◽  
Manohar Kulkarni
Keyword(s):  
Carbon Dioxide ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Superheated Steam ◽  
Carbon Dioxide Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Steam Gasification ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Integrated Gasification ◽  
Gasification Technology

Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) is believed to be one of the most promising technologies to offer electricity and other de-carbon fuels with carbon capture requirement as well as to meet other emission regulations at a relatively low cost. As one of the most important parts, different gasification technologies can greatly influence the performance of the system. This paper develops a model to examine the feasibilities and advantages of using Ultra Superheated Steam (USS) gasification technology in IGCC power plant with carbon dioxide capture and storage (CCS). USS gasification technology converts coal into syngas by the endothermic steam reforming reaction, and the heat required for this reaction is provided by the sensible heat in the ultra superheated steam. A burner utilizes synthetic air (21% O2 and 79% H2O) to burn fuel gas to produce the USS flame for the gasification process. The syngas generated from USS gasification has a higher hydrogen fraction (more than 50%) then other gasification processes. This high ratio of hydrogen is considered to be desired for a “capture-ready” IGCC plant. After gas cleanup and water gas shift reaction, the syngas goes to the Selexol process for carbon dioxide removal. Detailed calculations and analysis are performed to test the performance of USS gasification technology used in IGCC generation systems. Final results such as net output, efficiency penalty for CO2 capture part, and net thermal efficiency are calculated and compared when three different coal types are used. This paper uses published data of USS gasification from previous research at the University of North Dakota. The model also tries to treat the IGCC with carbon dioxide capture system as a whole thermal system, the superheated steam used in USS gasification can be provided by extracting steam from the lower pressure turbine in the Rankine Cycle. The model will make reasonable use of various waste energies and steams for both mechanical and chemical processes to improve the performance of the plant, and incorporate CO2 capture system into the design concept of the power plant.

Techno-Economic Evaluation of an IGCC Power Plant With Carbon Capture

2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Mansouri Majoumerd ◽  
Mohsen Assadi ◽  
Peter Breuhaus
Keyword(s):  
Economic Evaluation ◽  
Power Plant ◽  
Co2 Capture ◽  
Carbon Capture ◽  
Combined Cycle ◽  
Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle ◽  
Cost Index ◽  
Natural Gas Combined Cycle ◽  
Cost Scaling ◽  
Igcc Power Plant

Most of the scenarios presented by different actors and organizations in the energy sector predict an increasing power demand in the coming years mainly due to the world’s population growth. Meanwhile, global warming is still one of the planet’s main concerns and carbon capture and sequestration is considered one of the key alternatives to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions. The integrated gasification combined cycle (IGCC) power plant is a coal-derived power production technology which facilitates the pre-combustion capture of CO2 emissions. After the establishment of the baseline configuration of the IGCC plant with CO2 capture (reported in GT2011-45701), a techno-economic evaluation of the whole IGCC system is presented in this paper. Based on publicly available literature, a database was established to evaluate the cost of electricity (COE) for the plant using relevant cost scaling factors for the existing sub-systems, cost index, and financial parameters (such as discount rate and inflation rate). Moreover, an economic comparison has been carried out between the baseline IGCC plant, a natural gas combined cycle (NGCC), and a supercritical pulverized coal (SCPC) plant. The calculation results confirm that an IGCC plant is 180% more expensive than the NGCC. The overall efficiency of the IGCC plant with CO2 capture is 35.7% (LHV basis), the total plant cost (TPC) is 3,786 US$/kW, and the COE is 160 US$/MWh.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document