scholarly journals Screening for brain metastases in patients with stage III non–small-cell lung cancer, magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography? A prospective study

2019 ◽  
Vol 115 ◽  
pp. 88-96 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janna Schoenmaekers ◽  
Paul Hofman ◽  
Gerben Bootsma ◽  
Marcel Westenend ◽  
Machiel de Booij ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 115-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gang Yin ◽  
Churong Li ◽  
Heng Chen ◽  
Yangkun Luo ◽  
Lucia Clara Orlandini ◽  
...  

2015 ◽  
Vol 96 (1) ◽  
pp. 16-21
Author(s):  
A V Laryukov ◽  
E K Laryukova

Aim. To develop a personalized approach for using radiologic and nuclear examination methods diagnostics to improve early diagnosis of bone and brain metastases in patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer.Methods. The first group included 1473 patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer, who underwent chest X-ray, abdominal and pelvic ultrasonography, bone scintigraphy, and chest, abdominal and pelvic X-ray computed tomography with intravenous contrast from 2006 to 2010 for diagnosing remote metastases. The second group included 55 patients with peripheral non-small cell lung cancer, who underwent comprehensive examination of the full skeleton using X-ray computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, single-photon emission computed tomography, positron-emission tomography. The results of brain magnetic resonance imaging in 40 patients (group 3) with peripheral small cell lung cancer with brain metastases were also analyzed.Results.In peripheral non-small cell lung cancer, bone (23.9%) and brain (14%) metastases were the most frequent. The risk for bone metastases was significantly higher in patients with adenocarcinoma (pConclusion. For timely diagnosis of bone metastases, it is reasonable to administer positron-emission tomography with Fludeoxyglucose (18F) to all potentially resectable patients with peripheral small cell lung cancer, which in addition reveals metastases in other body regions. Brain magnetic resonance imaging should be administered if the primary tumor was detected.


2019 ◽  
Vol 55 (1) ◽  
pp. 9-16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tara Pereiro Brea ◽  
Alberto Ruano Raviña ◽  
Josèc) Martín Carreira Villamor ◽  
Antonio Golpe Gómez ◽  
Anxo Martínez de Alegría ◽  
...  

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (14) ◽  
pp. 3203-3211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lalitha K. Shankar ◽  
Daniel C. Sullivan

Accurate detection of the presence and extent of disease is vital in the management of non–small-cell lung cancer. While computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging tend to be the routine diagnostic modalities used in the management of lung cancer, there have been significant advances in the field of functional and molecular imaging. In this article, we review the performance of the functional imaging techniques that are currently available for the evaluation of non–small-cell lung cancer. The techniques range from evaluation of glucose metabolism in tumors with fluorodeoxyglucose, to evaluation of proliferation with fluorothymidine and evaluation of tumor hypoxia with agents such as fluoromisonidazole. Magnetic resonance imaging with an emphasis on dynamic contrast enhancement of tumors as well as detecting of malignant lymph nodes with targeted contrast agents is discussed. Emerging technologies such as lung imaging fluorescence endoscopy are considered. The role of functional imaging in planning, predicting response to, and evaluating effects of, various therapies is explored.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document