Differential behavioral functioning in the offspring of rats with high vs. low self-administration of the opioid agonist remifentanil

2021 ◽  
pp. 174407
Author(s):  
Amir H. Rezvani ◽  
Corinne Wells ◽  
Andrew Hawkey ◽  
Graham Blair ◽  
Reese Koburov ◽  
...  
2016 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-134 ◽  
Author(s):  
Preeti Barnwal ◽  
Saibal Das ◽  
Somnath Mondal ◽  
Anand Ramasamy ◽  
Tanay Maiti ◽  
...  

Opioid dependence leads to physical dependence and addiction which finally results in profound medical, psychological and social dysfunction. One of the useful medications for opioid dependence is buprenorphine, the partial opioid agonist, which is used alone or in combination with naloxone. However, buprenorphine is the victim of its own success due to its illicit use and accidental poisoning in children. Also, buprenorphine typically requires daily self-administration and its effectiveness heavily depends on patient adherence. So, poor treatment adherence results in ineffective treatment manifesting as craving and withdrawal symptoms. Short-term use of buprenorphine in opioid dependence is also often followed by relapse. Buprenorphine when used sublingually often results in inadequate or fluctuating blood concentrations and poorer treatment retention compared with methadone. All of these led to the development of Probuphine®, a polymeric matrix composed of ethylene vinyl acetate and buprenorphine in the form of implants, that are implanted subdermally in office practice and deliver the active drug over 6 months. Buprenorphine release from such implant is fairly consistent, avoiding plasma peaks and troughs, and the implant is also reported to be safe. In this review article, we have highlighted these aspects of treatment of opioid addiction, stressing on the pharmacology of buprenorphine and Probuphine®, and relevant clinical trials addressing the efficacy and safety of Probuphine®. This sustained-release implantable formulation of buprenorphine has the potential to be a suitable alternative to daily or alternate day sublingual buprenorphine which can thereby eliminate the need for daily supervision, minimizing fluctuations in plasma concentrations, and allowing these patients to reduce clinic or pharmacy visits.


2014 ◽  
Vol 231 (14) ◽  
pp. 2751-2758 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin B. Freeman ◽  
Jennifer E. Naylor ◽  
Thomas E. Prisinzano ◽  
William L. Woolverton

1999 ◽  
Vol 141 (4) ◽  
pp. 428-435 ◽  
Author(s):  
William A. Corrigall ◽  
Kathleen M. Coen ◽  
K. Laurel Adamson ◽  
Betty L. C. Chow

Methodology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joachim Gerich ◽  
Roland Lehner

Although ego-centered network data provide information that is limited in various ways as compared with full network data, an ego-centered design can be used without the need for a priori and researcher-defined network borders. Moreover, ego-centered network data can be obtained with traditional survey methods. However, due to the dynamic structure of the questionnaires involved, a great effort is required on the part of either respondents (with self-administration) or interviewers (with face-to-face interviews). As an alternative, we will show the advantages of using CASI (computer-assisted self-administered interview) methods for the collection of ego-centered network data as applied in a study on the role of social networks in substance use among college students.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document