Evaluation of 18 F-FDG PET/MRI, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, MRI, and CT in whole-body staging of recurrent breast cancer

2016 ◽  
Vol 85 (2) ◽  
pp. 459-465 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lino M. Sawicki ◽  
Johannes Grueneisen ◽  
Benedikt M. Schaarschmidt ◽  
Christian Buchbender ◽  
James Nagarajah ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Baun ◽  
Kirsten Falch ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Jeanette Hansen ◽  
Tram Nguyen ◽  
...  

Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (12) ◽  
pp. 1021
Author(s):  
Jorun Holm ◽  
Ziba Ahangarani Farahani ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Christina Baun ◽  
Kirsten Falch ◽  
...  

The purpose was to investigate the interrater agreement of FDG-PET/CT and bone scintigraphy for diagnosing bone recurrence in breast cancer patients. A total of 100 women with suspected recurrence of breast cancer underwent planar whole-body bone scintigraphy with [99mTc]DPD and FDG-PET/CT. Scans were evaluated independently by experienced nuclear medicine physicians and the results for one modality were blinded to the other. Images were visually interpreted using a 4-point assessment scale (0 = no metastases, 1 = probably no metastases, 2 = probably metastases, 3 = definite metastases). Out of 100 women, 22 (22%) were verified with distant recurrence, 18 of these had bone involvement. The proportions of agreement between readers were 93% (86.3–96.6) for bone recurrence with FDG-PET/CT and 47% (37.5–56.7) for bone recurrence with planar bone scintigraphy. The strengths of agreement between readers for diagnosing bone recurrence was ‘almost perfect’ with FDG-PET/CT and was ‘fair’ with planar bone scintigraphy according to Cohen’s kappa value of 0.82 (0.70–0.95) and 0.28 (0.18–0.39), respectively. Interrater agreement yielded improved reproducibility with FDG-PET/CT versus with bone scintigraphy when diagnosing recurrence with bone metastasis in this patient cohort.


2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 169-182
Author(s):  
Laura Evangelista ◽  
Luigi Mansi ◽  
Marta Burei ◽  
Giorgio Saladini

2007 ◽  
Vol 80 (955) ◽  
pp. 508-515 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Veit-Haibach ◽  
G Antoch ◽  
T Beyer ◽  
H Stergar ◽  
R Schleucher ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Vogsen ◽  
Jeanette Dupont Jensen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Anne Marie Bak Jylling ◽  
Jon Thor Asmussen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) has been implemented sporadically in hospital settings as the standard of care examination for recurrent breast cancer. We aimed to explore the clinical impact of implementing [18F]FDG-PET/CT for patients with clinically suspected recurrent breast cancer and validate the diagnostic accuracy. Methods Women with suspected distant recurrent breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study between September 2017 and August 2019. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was performed, and the appearance of incidental benign and malignant findings was registered. Additional examinations, complications, and the final diagnosis were registered to reflect the clinical consequence of such findings. The diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT as a stand-alone examination was analyzed. Biopsy and follow-up were used as a reference standard. Results [18F]FDG-PET/CT reported breast cancer metastases in 72 of 225 women (32.0%), and metastases were verified by biopsy in 52 (52/225, 23.1%). Prior probability and posterior probability of a positive test for suspected metastatic cancer and incidental malignancies were 27%/85% and 4%/20%, respectively. Suspected malignant incidental findings were reported in 46 patients (46/225, 20.4%), leading to further examinations and final detection of nine synchronous cancers (9/225, 4.0%). These cancers originated from the lung, thyroid, skin, pancreas, peritoneum, breast, kidney, one was malignant melanoma, and one was hematological cancer. False-positive incidental malignant findings were examined in 37/225 patients (16.4%), mainly in the colon (n = 12) and thyroid gland (n = 12). Ten incidental findings suspicious for benign disease were suggested by [18F]FDG-PET/CT, and further examinations resulted in the detection of three benign conditions requiring treatment. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC for diagnosing distant metastases were 1.00 (0.93–1.0), 0.88 (0.82–0.92), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97–0.99), respectively. Conclusion [18F]FDG-PET/CT provided a high posterior probability of positive test, and a negative test was able to rule out distant metastases in women with clinically suspected recurrent breast cancer. One-fifth of patients examined for incidental findings detected on [18F]FDG-PET/CT were diagnosed with clinically relevant conditions. Further examinations of false-positive incidental findings in one of six women should be weighed against the high accuracy for diagnosing metastatic breast cancer. Trial registration Clinical.Trials.gov. NCT03358589. Registered 30 November 2017—Retrospectively registered, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov


2015 ◽  
Vol 5 ◽  
pp. 35 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aung Zaw Win ◽  
Carina Mari Aparici

Our patient was a 36-year-old female diagnosed with Grade II ER+/PR−/Her-2 − ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) in the left breast. She underwent left lumpectomy and received treatment with tamoxifen and radiotherapy. Three years later, she presented with multiple diffused skin nodules on the chest and upper left arm. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) exam showed widespread metastasis in the chest, upper left arm, left axillary lymph nodes, and left suprascapular muscle. FDG-PET/CT imaging of breast carcinoma en cuirasse is very rare. FDG-PET/CT is useful in detecting recurrent breast cancer.


2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandre Cochet ◽  
Steven David ◽  
Kate Moodie ◽  
Elizabeth Drummond ◽  
Gaelle Dutu ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marianne Vogsen ◽  
Jeanette Dupont Jensen ◽  
Oke Gerke ◽  
Anne Marie Bak Jylling ◽  
Jon Thor Asmussen ◽  
...  

Abstract Background [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography / computed tomography ([18F]FDG-PET/CT) has been implemented sporadically in hospital settings as the standard of care examination for recurrent breast cancer. We aimed to explore the clinical impact of implementing [18F]FDG-PET/CT for patients with clinically suspected recurrent breast cancer and validate the diagnostic accuracy. Methods Women with suspected distant recurrent breast cancer were prospectively enrolled in the study between September 2017 and August 2019. [18F]FDG-PET/CT was performed, and the appearance of incidental benign and malignant findings was registered. Additional examinations, complications, and the final diagnosis were registered to reflect the clinical consequence of such findings. The diagnostic accuracy of [18F]FDG-PET/CT as a stand-alone examination was analyzed. Biopsy and follow-up were used as a reference standard. Results [18F]FDG-PET/CT reported breast cancer metastases in 72 of 225 women (32.0%), and metastases were verified by biopsy in 52 (52/225, 23.1%). Prior probability and posterior probability of a positive test for suspected metastatic cancer and incidental malignancies were 27%/85% and 4%/20%, respectively. Suspected malignant incidental findings were reported in 46 patients (46/225, 20.4%), leading to further examinations and final detection of nine synchronous cancers (9/225, 4.0%). These cancers originated from the lung, thyroid, skin, pancreas, peritoneum, breast, kidney, one was malignant melanoma, and one was hematological cancer. False-positive incidental malignant findings were examined in 37/225 patients (16.4%), mainly in the colon (n = 12) and thyroid gland (n = 12). Ten incidental findings suspicious for benign disease were suggested by [18F]FDG-PET/CT, and further examinations resulted in the detection of three benign conditions requiring treatment. Sensitivity, specificity, and AUC-ROC for diagnosing distant metastases were 1.00 (0.93-1.0), 0.88 (0.82-0.92), and 0.98 (95% CI 0.97-0.99), respectively.Conclusion [18F]FDG-PET/CT provided a high posterior probability of positive test, and a negative test was able to rule out distant metastases in women with clinically suspected recurrent breast cancer. One-fifth of patients examined for incidental findings detected on [18F]FDG-PET/CT were diagnosed with clinically relevant conditions. Further examinations of false-positive incidental findings in one of six women should be weighed against the high accuracy for diagnosing metastatic breast cancer.Trial registration: Clinical.Trials.gov. NCT03358589. Registered 30 November 2017 - Retrospectively registered, http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document