Impact of 18F-FDG PET/MR on therapeutic management in high risk primary breast cancer patients – A prospective evaluation of staging algorithms

2020 ◽  
Vol 128 ◽  
pp. 108975
Author(s):  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Ole Martin ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Ken Herrmann ◽  
Ann-Kathrin Bittner ◽  
...  
The Breast ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. S61-S62
Author(s):  
J.W.H. Tsang ◽  
D. Yeung ◽  
A.C.Y. Chan ◽  
C.H.N. Wong ◽  
L.W.S. Leung ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Nils Martin Bruckmann ◽  
Julian Kirchner ◽  
Lale Umutlu ◽  
Wolfgang Peter Fendler ◽  
Robert Seifert ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives To compare the diagnostic performance of [18F]FDG PET/MRI, MRI, CT, and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in the initial staging of primary breast cancer patients. Material and methods A cohort of 154 therapy-naive patients with newly diagnosed, histopathologically proven breast cancer was enrolled in this study prospectively. All patients underwent a whole-body [18F]FDG PET/MRI, computed tomography (CT) scan, and a bone scintigraphy prior to therapy. All datasets were evaluated regarding the presence of bone metastases. McNemar χ2 test was performed to compare sensitivity and specificity between the modalities. Results Forty-one bone metastases were present in 7/154 patients (4.5%). Both [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone were able to detect all of the patients with histopathologically proven bone metastases (sensitivity 100%; specificity 100%) and did not miss any of the 41 malignant lesions (sensitivity 100%). CT detected 5/7 patients (sensitivity 71.4%; specificity 98.6%) and 23/41 lesions (sensitivity 56.1%). Bone scintigraphy detected only 2/7 patients (sensitivity 28.6%) and 15/41 lesions (sensitivity 36.6%). Furthermore, CT and scintigraphy led to false-positive findings of bone metastases in 2 patients and in 1 patient, respectively. The sensitivity of PET/MRI and MRI alone was significantly better compared with CT (p < 0.01, difference 43.9%) and bone scintigraphy (p < 0.01, difference 63.4%). Conclusion [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI are significantly better than CT or bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. Both CT and bone scintigraphy show a substantially limited sensitivity in detection of bone metastases. Key Points • [18F]FDG PET/MRI and MRI alone are significantly superior to CT and bone scintigraphy for the detection of bone metastases in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer. • Radiation-free whole-body MRI might serve as modality of choice in detection of bone metastases in breast cancer patients.


2006 ◽  
Vol 33 (7) ◽  
pp. 785-791 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Rousseau ◽  
E. Bourbouloux ◽  
L. Campion ◽  
N. Fleury ◽  
B. Bridji ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 28 (4) ◽  
pp. 267-272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicolas Aide ◽  
Virginie Huchet ◽  
Odile Switsers ◽  
Natacha Heutte ◽  
Thierry Delozier ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (4) ◽  
pp. 719-720
Author(s):  
A. Bertuzzi ◽  
G. Gullo ◽  
L. Rimassa ◽  
L. Castagna ◽  
A. Santoro

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document