Outcomes of pelvic exenteration for locally advanced primary rectal cancer: Overall survival and quality of life

577 Background: Liver resection is considered the only curative treatment of liver metastases (mets) from colo-rectal (CRC) tumors. Ltx is standard of care in selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma and neuroendocrine tumors. Patients with non-resectable liver metastases (mets) from colo-rectal cancer (CRC) receiving palliative chemotherapy have a median survival of about 2 and 1 year from start of 1. and 2. line chemotherapy, respectively. Overall 5 years survival in CRC patients after start of palliative chemotherapy is about 5-10%. In this study we examined overall survival after Ltx in selected CRC patients. The primary endpoint of the study was overall survival at 2 years after Ltx Methods: Major inclusion criteria were: non-resectable liver mets, no extra hepatic disease or local relapse determined by PET/CT scan, CT- or MRI scan and colonoscopy. No mets. on frozen section biopsies at time of surgery, ECOG 0-1, at least one line of chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Postoperative immunosuppresion: mTOR inhibitor (Rapamune), mycofpenolmofetil and tapering doses of prednisolon. Quality of life questionnaire (EORTC-C30) pre Ltx, 3, 6 and 12 months post Ltx. Results: Thirteen men and 8 women with non-resectable liver only CRC liver mets received Ltx in the period of Nov 2006 to March 2011. Median age was 56 years (range 45-65 years). Thirteen patients had colon cancer and 8 patients had rectal cancer. The T-stage of the primary tumor was T2,T3 and T4 in 2, 16 and 3 patients, respectively. N status of the primary tumor was: pN0, pN1 and pN2 all 7 patients. Nine patients had received 1.line chemotherapy and 12 patients had received 2. or 3.line therapy. The median number of liver mets was 8 (range 2-40) and the median size of the largest lesion was 4.5cm (range 2.8-13cm). The patients had good, stabile or increased Global Health Score and Physical Function at all time points after Ltx. Fifteen patients with follow-up of 2 years or more or death within 2 years of Ltx had 2 years overall survival of 87%. Conclusions: Long term survival is obtained after Ltx in selected patients with non-resectable liver mets from CRC. The patients reported good quality of life and physical function after Ltx.

Download Full-text

Clinical downstaging and quality of life after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: Interim analysis from a phase II clinical trial.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.e15178 ◽

2019 ◽

Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽

pp. e15178-e15178

Author(s):

Ahmed Abdalla ◽

Amr M. Aref ◽

Amer Alame ◽

Danny Ma ◽

Mohammed Barawi ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Clinical Trial ◽

Rectal Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽

Phase Ii ◽

General Health ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

e15178 Background: The role of neoadjuvant FOLFOX in achieving clinical downstaging and improvement in quality of life (QOL) in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) remains to be established. We are conducting a phase II prospective clinical trial to evaluate the use of six cycles of FOLFOX as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with T2-T3/N0-N+ rectal cancer. We now report tumor clinical downstaging and patient-reported QOL in our first patient cohort. Methods: Eleven Patients enrolled in our phase II prospective trial. Patients received three months of FOLFOX (infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin) administered every two weeks. After three weeks of recovery, each patient was treated with conventional chemo-radiotherapy (5FU or capecitabine) All patients had an MRI and endorectal ultrasound at baseline and after completion of FOLFOX. A compilation of validated QOL questionnaires were also administered before and after FOLFOX. Results: A total of 11 patients completed the chemotherapy regimen. Based on pelvic MRI, complete clinical response (T0N0) was achieved by seven patients (64%), one patient (9%) was clinically downstaged but three (27%) didn’t have any changes following FOLFOX. Importantly, we found no disease progression during the FOLFOX course. QOL assessment after FOLFOX regimen showed trend towards improvement in general health, mobility, bladder control and psychological health. These changes in QOL were not statistically significant due to the small sample size. Patients self-grading of their general health before starting FOLFOX was 50% compared to 75% after. Of the five patients with pain at time of diagnosis, four reported complete pain relief while the fifth reported improvement from extreme to moderate pain. Three patients reported improvement in their anxiety/depression. In terms of bowel function, although there was trend towards improvement in the urgency subscale, other bowel functions subscales were unchanged. In general, scores for mobility, selfcare, and bladder function were slightly better after FOLFOX. Conclusions: This study suggests that adding only six cycles of neoadjuvant FOLFOX before CRT not only resulted in clinical downstaging of (LARC) but showed a trend toward improved QOL. This result provides some reassurance for oncologists that this approach does not diminish QOL with no risk of disease progression during the time of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These findings need to be validated in a larger phase III trial.

Download Full-text

The Quality-of-Life Effects of Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics ◽

10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.09.006 ◽

2013 ◽

Vol 85 (1) ◽

pp. e15-e19 ◽

Cited By ~ 31

Author(s):

Joseph M. Herman ◽

Amol K. Narang ◽

Kent A. Griffith ◽

Mark M. Zalupski ◽

Jennifer B. Reese ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Rectal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Neoadjuvant Chemoradiation

Download Full-text

Prospective assessment of symptoms and quality of life in localized rectal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy.

Journal of Clinical Oncology ◽

10.1200/jco.2011.29.4_suppl.504 ◽

2011 ◽

Vol 29 (4_suppl) ◽

pp. 504-504

Author(s):

J. M. Herman ◽

K. A. Griffith ◽

A. K. Narang ◽

M. M. Zalupski ◽

N. S. Azad ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Rectal Cancer ◽

Sexual Function ◽

Cancer Patients ◽

Locally Advanced ◽

Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer ◽

Gi Symptoms ◽

Grade 3

504 Background: Neoadjuvant conformal chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is an important component of treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer, yet its morbidity has not been well characterized using quality of life (QOL) instruments. The present study attempts to establish a baseline distribution of QOL scores before, during, and after CRT and to correlate these changes with symptoms. Methods: Patients undergoing 3-4 field neoadjuvant CRT for localized rectal cancer were prospectively enrolled at two institutions. Fifty patients completed the QOL instruments at three time points: pretreatment, week 4 of treatment, and 1 month post-treatment. QOL information was captured using three validated questionnaires, the EORTC QLQ-30, QLQ-38, and QLQ-29. Additionally, institutional symptom inventories and CTCAE toxicity data were collected. Results: Average age was 59.2 years and 72% were men. During CRT, patients had a statistically significant decline in global QOL (70 to 60, p = 0.0024), which normalized (71) following completion of treatment. During therapy, patients also experienced a significant increase in GI symptoms (21 to 27, p = 0.028), urinary symptoms (16 to 30, p < 0.0001), male sexual dysfunction (23 to 34, p = 0.013), and chemotherapy related side effects (8 to 20, p = 0.0001). While these measures returned to baseline 1 month post-CRT, overall sexual function (25 vs. 37, p = 0.0062) and sexual enjoyment (53 vs. 67, p = 0.0070) remained persistently low compared to pretreatment levels. Diarrhea (27%) and proctitis (22%) were the most common grade 3 toxicities. Those patients who experienced grade 3 toxicity during treatment showed markedly decreased global QOL (mean difference = 34). Conclusions: While rectal cancer patients experienced impaired QOL during neoadjuvant CRT, the vast majority of measures normalized one month after treatment. In contrast, significantly decreased sexual function and enjoyment persisted. This data can be used as a baseline to compare future neoadjuvant conformal CRT regimens and/or assess the toxicity and QOL of new RT modalities such as intensity modulated radiation therapy. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Download Full-text