Abstract
Background
The incidence of aortic dissection has been reported to be lower in women; however, women have a poor prognosis. Also, the incidence of false lumen thrombosis has been reported to be different between Europe, the United States, and Japan. We aimed to determine gender differences in long-term prognosis of acute type B aortic dissection.
Methods
We retrospectively reviewed 220 consecutive patients hospitalized for acute type B aortic dissection between January 2012 to December 2017. After exclusion criteria of unknown onset time, >14 days after the onset, in-hospital death, and aortic events requiring additional treatment during hospitalization were applied, 186 patients were analyzed by gender: 133 men and 53 women. The patient background, treatment method, prognosis, and outcome were compared and examined.
Results
Both the proportions of smoking history and patients receiving oxygen therapy during hospitalization were significantly higher in men (59% vs. 22%, p<0.01; 91% vs. 72%, p<0.01, respectively), whereas that of classical aortic dissection was similar between men and women (41% vs. 32%, p=0.36). The avoidance rate of a composite of all deaths and aortic events 2 years after discharge was similar (hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.52 to 1.59; p=0.966).(Picture1)
Picture 1
Conclusion
The long-term prognosis of acute type B aortic dissection treated by medical therapy during hospitalization was equivalent in men and women despite gender differences in several background factors.
Long-term Outcome of Patients with Acute Type B Aortic Dissection – A Single-centre Experience
