Three-dimensional assessment of temporomandibular joints in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions: Cone beam computed tomography analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maged Sultan Alhammadi ◽  
Mona Salah Fayed ◽  
Amr Labib
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Temporomandibular Joints ◽  
Dimensional Assessment ◽  
Tomography Analysis

scholarly journals Anatomical characteristics of mandibular bone in skeletal Class I, II and III patients by using cone beam computed tomography images in an iranian population

2021 ◽  
Vol 24 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mohammad Zandi ◽  
Abbas Shokri ◽  
Vahid Mollabashi ◽  
Zahed Eghdami ◽  
Payam Amini
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Anatomical Characteristics ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Skeletal Class Ii ◽  
Ramus Height

Objetive: This study aimed to compare the anatomical characteristics of the mandible in patients with skeletal class I, II and class III disorders using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Material and Methods: CBCT scans of patients between 17 to 40 years taken with NewTom 3G CBCT system with 12-inch field of view (FOV) were selected from the archive. Lateral cephalograms were obtained from CBCT scans of patients, and type of skeletal malocclusion was determined (Class I, II or III). All CBCT scans were evaluated in the sagittal, coronal and axial planes using the N.N.T viewer software. Results: The ramus height and distance from the mandibular foramen to the sigmoid notch in class II patients were significantly different from those in skeletal class I (P < 0.005). Distance from the mandibular canal to the anterior border of ramus in class III individuals was significantly different from that in skeletal class I individuals (P < .005). Conclusion: Length of the body of mandible in skeletal class I was significantly different from that in skeletal class II and III patients. Also, ramus height in skeletal class I was significantly different from that in skeletal class II patients. CBCT had high efficacy for accurate identification of anatomical landmarks.   Keywords Prognathism; Retrognathism; Mandible; Anatomy; Cone beam computed tomography.

scholarly journals Evaluation of horizontal condylar angle in malocclusions with mandibular lateral displacement using cone-beam computed tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberto L. Velásquez ◽  
Jorge C. Coro ◽  
José M. Bustillo ◽  
Sadao Sato
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Lateral Displacement ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Contralateral Side ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Significant Difference

ABSTRACT Objectives To evaluate the horizontal condylar angle (HCA) in mandibular lateral displacement (MLD). Materials and Method s: HCA in MLD malocclusions were examined using cone-beam computed tomography data in subjects with MLD and control subjects. Results HCA in joints of control patients and contralateral side joints of MLD patients were not significantly different. The mean HCA on the shifted side was larger than on the contralateral side (P &lt; .001) in the different HCA groups. HCA was significantly larger on the shifted side than on the contralateral side in skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III groups (P &lt; .001). Conclusions (1) There was no statistically significant difference between HCA in control patients and on the contralateral side in MLD patients. (2) HCA was significantly larger on the shifted side than on the contralateral side. (3) HCA on the shifted side and the contralateral side in MLD Class I, Class II, and Class III are significantly different.

scholarly journals Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography

2011 ◽  
Vol 82 (1) ◽  
pp. 67-74 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ahmet Yagci ◽  
İlknur Veli ◽  
Tancan Uysal ◽  
Faruk Izzet Ucar ◽  
Törün Ozer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Null Hypothesis ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
The Other ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Dental Malocclusion

Abstract Objective: To test the null hypothesis that the presence of dehiscence and fenestration was not different among patients with skeletal Class I, II, and III malocclusions. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, a total of 123 cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images were obtained with an iCAT scanner (Imaging Sciences International, Hatfield, Pa). Patients with normal vertical patterns were classified according to dental malocclusion and ANB angle. Class I comprised 41 patients—21 girls and 20 boys (mean age, 22.4 ± 4.5 years); Class II comprised 42 patients—22 girls and 20 boys (mean age, 21.5 ± 4.2 years); and Class III comprised 40 subjects—22 girls and 18 boys (mean age, 22.1 ± 4.5 years). A total of 3444 teeth were evaluated. Analysis of variance and Tukey's test were used for statistical comparisons at the P &lt; .05 level. Results: Statistical analysis indicated that the Class II group had a greater prevalence of fenestration than the other groups (P &lt; .001). No difference was found in the prevalence of dehiscence among the three groups. Although fenestration had greater prevalence in the maxilla, more dehiscence was found in the mandible for all groups. In Class I, alveolar defects (dehiscence, fenestration) were matched relatively in both jaws. Furthermore, Class II and Class III subjects had more alveolar defects (41.11% and 45.02%, respectively) in the mandible. Dehiscences were seen with greater frequency in the mandibular incisors of all groups. Conclusion: The null hypothesis was rejected. Significant differences in the presence of fenestration were found among subjects with skeletal Class I, Class II, and Class III malocclusions. Fenestrations had greater prevalence in the maxilla, but more dehiscences were found in the mandible.

scholarly journals Influence of skeletal class in the morphology of cervical vertebrae: A study using cone beam computed tomography

2016 ◽  
Vol 87 (1) ◽  
pp. 131-137 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luela Aranitasi ◽  
Beatriz Tarazona ◽  
Natalia Zamora ◽  
Jose Luis Gandía ◽  
Vanessa Paredes
Keyword(s):  
Computed Tomography ◽  
Cone Beam Computed Tomography ◽  
Cervical Vertebrae ◽  
Class I ◽  
Cone Beam ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Skeletal Class ◽  
Head Posture ◽  
Interobserver Error

ABSTRACT Objectives: To quantify the prevalence of cervical vertebrae anomalies and to analyze any association between them and skeletal malocclusions or head posture positions in the same study. Materials and Methods: Two hundred forty patients who were attending the Department of Orthodontics of the University of Valencia for orthodontic treatment were selected and divided into three groups: skeletal Class I (control group, 0° &lt;ANB &lt; 4°), Class II (ANB ≥ 4°), and Class III (ANB ≤ 0°) according to ANB Steiner angle. The morphology of the first five cervical vertebrae was analyzed with cone beam computed tomography to identify any anomalies. Intra- and interobserver error methods were calculated. Results: Dehiscence and fusion of one unit (both 23.3%) and partial cleft (11.7%) were the most frequent anomalies, while occipitalization was the least common (3.3%). Dehiscence anomaly was observed when the control group was compared with Classes II and III and partial cleft anomaly when Class I was compared with Class III. Furthermore, NSBa and ss-N-sm/ANB angles were associated with partial cleft anomaly, while NSL/NL angle and extended head posture were associated with fusion anomaly. Conclusions: Fusion, dehiscence, and partial cleft were the most frequent cervical vertebrae anomalies. Dehiscence and partial cleft were found to present statistically significant differences between Class I and Classes II and III. Cervical vertebrae anomalies and head posture were associated with fusion.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document