The political economy of energy regulation in OECD countries

2011 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 816-825 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chun Ping Chang ◽  
Aziz N. Berdiev
2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 116-130 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gebhard Kirchgässner

AbstractIn OECD countries, we have observed a considerable increase in public debt over recent decades caused by large and lasting deficits. What is the reason for this development and why is it rather different by country? There are two approaches to explain this. Traditional economic theory explains why it makes sense to allow deficits of public budgets in certain situations, which might result in a limited amount of public debt. It also shows the conditions for the sustainability of public finances namely that public debt stays below certain limits and, in particular, does not - in the long run - increase faster than GDP. Following the recommendations of this approach, public budget surpluses should be run in economic upswings to compensate for deficits in recessions. By contrast, politico-economic approaches explain why democratic governments have incentives to allow deficits even in periods of economic upswings. In the long run, this can lead to ever-increasing public debt. To prevent this, institutional provisions are necessary. In this respect, Swiss debt brakes at the national and cantonal levels as well as the new German rules are of particular interest.


Author(s):  
Javier González

The chapter analyses the political economy of inequality in Chile from a historical perspective, highlighting the need to use a holistic institutional approach in order to unravel persistent structural inequalities. It examines the power of elites to shape formal rules to their advantage, studying the income distribution of the top 1 per cent and the key characteristics of the Chilean tax system. This institution is analysed for its centrality to the distributive class struggle of a society. The analysis shows that Chile’s income concentration at the top 1 per cent is extremely high, even when compared to OECD countries when the latter had the same level of economic development as Chile today. Therefore, the levels of inequality in Chile cannot be fully explained by market forces, as the neoclassical approach suggests, nor by Chile’s level of economic development; instead, data suggest the existence of an ‘institutional lag’ (exemplified by the current tax system), sustained by asymmetries of power.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document