Associations between low back muscle activity, pelvic movement and low back discomfort development during prolonged standing – An exploratory laboratory study

2019 ◽  
Vol 72 ◽  
pp. 380-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rudolf Wall ◽  
Thomas Läubli ◽  
Robert Seibt ◽  
Monika A. Rieger ◽  
Benjamin Steinhilber
2018 ◽  
Vol 61 ◽  
pp. 250-256 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maicom Lima ◽  
Arthur Sá Ferreira ◽  
Felipe José Jandre Reis ◽  
Vanessa Paes ◽  
Ney Meziat-Filho

1988 ◽  
Vol 178 (5) ◽  
pp. 455-460 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Vink ◽  
N. Karssemeijer

2005 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-40 ◽  
Author(s):  
Claudine J. C. Lamoth ◽  
Onno G. Meijer ◽  
Andreas Daffertshofer ◽  
Paul I. J. M. Wuisman ◽  
Peter J. Beek

Spine ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol Publish Ahead of Print ◽  
Author(s):  
Seobin Choi ◽  
Misol Kim ◽  
Eunjee Kim ◽  
Gwanseob Shin

Author(s):  
Heather A. Johnston ◽  
Susari Wanninayake ◽  
Janessa D.M. Drake

BACKGROUND: Chest size is a known factor in the development of back pain for women. However, the neuromuscular mechanisms associated with chest size and back pain are poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate chest size and its association with back pain development and muscle activity patterns during prolonged standing. METHODS: Twenty university-aged women were divided into two groups: small chest size (n= 10, ∼B/C cup) and large chest size (n= 10, ∼D/E cup). Participants completed a 2-hr standing protocol, where eight channels of bilateral trunk electromyography were collected. Muscle activity, specifically co-contraction, was compared between chest size groups, pain developers, and time. RESULTS: The large chest size group reported higher amounts of pain at the upper, middle, and low back. Women in the large chest group sustained higher levels of co-contraction for muscles involving the thoracic and lumbar erector spinae compared to those in the small chest size group during prolonged standing. CONCLUSIONS: Thoracolumbar co-contraction determined in this study may be a potential mechanism contributing to increased back pain development for women with large chest sizes during prolonged standing. This pain mechanism could be targeted and addressed in future non-invasive musculoskeletal rehabilitation to improve back pain for women.


2013 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
pp. 57-62
Author(s):  
Nabilla Sofia Mohd Kamil ◽  
Siti Zawiah Md Dawal

Few studies have investigated sitting posture and muscle activity during computer work. This study aims to determine sitting postural angle and its influence on neck and low back muscle activity in ageing women workforce during computer task. Seventeen female workers aged 50 and above participated. Surface electromyography activity was recorded from cervical erector spinae, lumbar multifidus, longgisimus and iliocostalis in 20 minutes computer task. Concurrently inclinometer recordings from upper trunk and pelvis were used to determine back posture. The results for the upper trunk angle show that the posture deviates from the sagittal plane in range-10 to 10 degree during the task. While the pelvic rotated forward and backward in range-15 to 15 degree.Neutral sitting posture with slight extension or flexion of the upper trunk and pelvic posture performed by ageing women workforce during computer work cause reduction in muscle activity. Higher level of muscle activity was indicated in back flexion rather than back extension.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document