Design assessment of a horizontal shell and tube latent heat storage system: Alternative to fin designs

2021 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 103282
Author(s):  
Gurpreet Singh Sodhi ◽  
Vishnu Kumar ◽  
P. Muthukumar
Keyword(s):  
Latent Heat ◽  
Heat Storage ◽  
Storage System ◽  
Latent Heat Storage ◽  
Design Assessment ◽  
Shell And Tube

scholarly journals Influence of the modeling parameters on the numerical CFD simulation of a shell-and-tube latent heat storage system with circular fins

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clément Beust ◽  
Erwin Franquet ◽  
Jean-Pierre Bédécarrats ◽  
Pierre Garcia ◽  
Jérôme Pouvreau
Keyword(s):  
Latent Heat ◽  
Heat Storage ◽  
Cfd Simulation ◽  
Storage System ◽  
Latent Heat Storage ◽  
Shell And Tube

Influence of fin parameters on melting and solidification characteristics of a conical shell and tube latent heat storage unit

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-37
Author(s):  
Lokesh Kalapala ◽  
Jaya Krishna Devanuri
Keyword(s):  
Cylindrical Shell ◽  
Latent Heat ◽  
Conical Shell ◽  
Heat Storage ◽  
Melting Time ◽  
Storage Unit ◽  
Latent Heat Storage ◽  
Efficient Operation ◽  
Shell And Tube ◽  
Melting And Solidification

Abstract Augmenting meting and solidification rates of latent heat storage unit (LHSU) is very much essential for its efficient operation. By the effective utilization of natural convection, rate of heat transfer can be enhanced and the conical shell is beneficent in this regard. Employing fins further improves the charging and discharging rates. Hence the current study is focused on analyzing melting and solidification characteristics of a conical shell and tube LHSU along with the effect of fin parameters viz. fin diameter and number of fins. Numerical analysis is chosen for this purpose and the performance is compared via melting/solidification times, energy stored, energy/exergy efficiencies. Initially the performance of unfinned conical shell is compared with the cylindrical shell without fins and then the effect of fin parameters is presented. For melting process conical shell is found to be superior to cylindrical shell. 34.46% reduction in melting time is noted by employing conical shell and rate of energy stored is also higher for conical shell. Increase in fin diameter caused an increase in melting time when 20 number of fins are used, whereas melting time got decreased with the increase in fin diameter when 5 number of fins are used. Hence, when a greater number of fins are employed lesser diameter is preferred for melting. For discharging process, conical shell took 60% more time than cylindrical shell. Even after employing fins, solidification time is not drastically reduced in comparison to cylindrical shell.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document