Comorbid symptoms as assessed by Hamilton anxiety scale in outpatients with generalized anxiety disorders (GAD)

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 ◽  
pp. S218
Author(s):  
J. Bobes ◽  
L. Caballero ◽  
M. Perez ◽  
I. Vilardaga ◽  
J. Rejas
2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 109-114 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nadir A. Aliyev ◽  
Zafar N. Aliyev

AbstractObjectiveAnxiety disorders are highly prevalent in population of European countries. However, the effect of Valproate (depakine-chrono) on generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) has not been studied in a double-blind placebo-controlled design.MethodEighty patients (all men) were washout from the all medications. Each patient was randomized to receive either depakine-chrono (40 patients) for 6 weeks or matched placebo (40 patients) in a double-blind manner. Eligible participants, in addition to meeting the DSM-IV criteria for GAD and having a minimum score of 25 and more on the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, were required to be between 18 and 65 years. Response was defined as a 50% reduction in the Hamilton anxiety scale score. Response and side effects with depakine-chrono and placebo were compared by using analysis of variance (ANOVA) and chi-square tests. Six patients did not return for at least one subsequent assessment, leaving 74 patients (36 taking depakine-chrono and 38 taking placebo) in the valuables study group.ResultsTwenty six of the 36 depakine-chrono-treated participants responded by 6 weeks, versus six of the 38 placebo-treated participants (p < 0.001). The most common and problematic side effect in the depakine-chrono group was dizziness and nausea.ConclusionsThe authors believe this to be the first double-blind placebo-controlled randomization study to test the efficacy of a depakine-chrono in the management of anxiety disorders. They need to be replicated in a larger study group.


2019 ◽  
Vol 33 (5) ◽  
pp. 543-547
Author(s):  
Chris Gale ◽  
Paul Glue ◽  
Giuseppe Guaiana ◽  
John Coverdale ◽  
Maeve McMurdo ◽  
...  

Background: Generalized anxiety disorder is a common psychiatric condition that is associated with decreased quality of life and significant disability. Benzodiazepines are anti-anxiety drugs used widely in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder. This study examines the influence of several variables on benzodiazepine efficacy in generalized anxiety disorder. Method: We performed a systematic review of placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials with benzodiazepines in generalized anxiety disorder. Fifty-eight studies were deemed eligible to include in the meta-analysis. The studies dated from 1977 to 2013 and included over 5400 participants. From each paper, we extracted: benzodiazepine name and dose, dosing regimen, baseline Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) score, change in HAM-A score at study endpoint, drop-out rate, year of study publication, diagnostic criteria used, study size, study duration, location, any conflicts of interest and side-effect profile. We then assessed the influence, direct and indirect, of individual variables on the primary outcome (mean difference at endpoint, HAM-A score). Results: Three factors were shown to be associated statistically with change in HAM-A; baseline HAM-A for benzodiazepine arm, baseline HAM-A for the placebo arm, and duration of the study. A higher baseline HAM-A in both arms was associated with a greater mean difference in HAM-A. A shorter study length was also associated with a greater mean difference. Discussion: The major factors determining benzodiazepine response was baseline anxiety level for the benzodiazepine arm and study duration. In any design of further meta-analyses and clinical trials for generalized anxiety disorder we suggest that these should be considered these as confounding factors.


1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 119-125 ◽  
Author(s):  
D Loldrup ◽  
M Langemark ◽  
HJ Hansen ◽  
M Kastrup ◽  
K Jeppesen ◽  
...  

SummaryIn patients with chronic idiopathic pain disorders we have analysed the construct validity of the Melancholia Scale as compared to the results with the scale in primary depression. The patients (n= 253) were treated in a placebo controlled trial with either clomipramine or mianserin independently of the Melancholia score. The construct validity of the Melancholia Scale was further analysed by the testing of the intensity model of depression versus anxiety using the Beck Depression Inventory, the Hamilton Anxiety Scale, the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Scale, and the Melancholia Scale. The construct validity in terms of scale homogeneity was analysed by Loevinger coefficients which can be considered as a latent structure evaluation. The Melancholia Scale showed acceptable homogeneity, while the Hamilton Anxiety Scale lacked sufficient homogeneity. In total, 33% of the patients had a score of 10 or more on the Melancholia Scale (corresponding to 13 or more on the Hamilton Depression Scale). The predictive validity of the Melancholia Scale was evaluated using active treatment versus placebo response after 6 weeks of therapy. It was shown that in patients with a Melancholia Scale score of 10 or more (corresponding to “less than major depression”) 72% had full recovery when treated with clomipramine, while 36% of the placebo treated patients obtained a full recovery (P≤0.05). The patients treated with mianserin obtained a full recovery in 52%. The group of patients with a Melancholia Scale score of 10 or more scored higher also on the anxiety scales indicating that the relation between depression and anxiety is a matter of severity. The depressed patients had significantly lower imipramine binding sites than the non-depressed patients.


2004 ◽  
Vol 74 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-42 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Linden ◽  
D. Zubraegel ◽  
T. Baer ◽  
U. Franke ◽  
P. Schlattmann

1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 593-602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dennis S Charney ◽  
John J Krystal ◽  
Steven M Southwick ◽  
Linda M Nagy ◽  
Scott W Woods ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document