Prediction of Intravesical Recurrence After Radical Nephroureterectomy: Development of a Clinical Decision-making Tool

2014 ◽  
Vol 65 (3) ◽  
pp. 650-658 ◽  
Author(s):  
Evanguelos Xylinas ◽  
Luis Kluth ◽  
Niccolo Passoni ◽  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Malte Rieken ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 189 (4S) ◽  
Author(s):  
Evanguelos Xylinas ◽  
Quoc-Dien Trinh ◽  
Luis Kluth ◽  
David Green ◽  
Douglas Scherr ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 110 (7) ◽  
pp. 1688-1697 ◽  
Author(s):  
E A Rakha ◽  
D Soria ◽  
A R Green ◽  
C Lemetre ◽  
D G Powe ◽  
...  

1987 ◽  
Vol 40 (5) ◽  
pp. 385-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sylvia Wassertheil-Smoller ◽  
Richard M. Steingart ◽  
John P. Wexler ◽  
Jonathan Tobin ◽  
Nancy Budner ◽  
...  

Hand Therapy ◽  
2020 ◽  
pp. 175899832097213
Author(s):  
Emily McMullen ◽  
Megan Robson ◽  
Mark Paul Brewin ◽  
Poonam Valand ◽  
Leela Sayed ◽  
...  

Introduction For many patients, audio-visual appointments have provided a timely and efficient way of seeking advice, assessment and treatment for their hand injuries during the NHS response to COVID-19. This study aimed to explore the experience of hand units across the UK in determining the safe and judicious use of audio-visual outpatient care for the management of acute upper limb trauma. Methods An online cross-sectional survey was sent to the therapy leads of hand units across the UK. Questions focused on the experience of using audio-visual technology in the management of upper limb trauma, and the relevant factors in determining its appropriate use. A deductive mixed methods analysis was used to identify both common themes and capture community experience and characteristics. Results A total of 51 out of 76 hand therapy units completed the survey; a response rate of 67%. Of these, 82% (42/51) reported using audio-visual technology to manage upper limb trauma during the UK COVID-19 lockdown. When determining patient suitability for audio-visual consultations, 73% (37/51) of respondents reported the use of COVID-19 guidelines, but only 35% (18/51) reported the use of a clinical decision-making tool. In agreement with our experience at Salisbury Hospital Foundation Trust, 92% (47/51) had concerns relating to the use of audio-visual care. Conclusion The choice of safely managed remote care or in-person consultation has, to date, largely relied on the discretion of the clinician. A carefully designed clinical decision-making tool for the management of upper limb trauma is needed for use both in clinical practice and in future service planning.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Breda H. F. Eubank ◽  
Sebastian W. Lackey ◽  
Mel Slomp ◽  
Jason R. Werle ◽  
Colleen Kuntze ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Shoulder pain is a highly prevalent condition and a significant cause of morbidity and functional disability. Current data suggests that many patients presenting with shoulder pain at the primary care level are not receiving high quality care. Primary care decision-making is complex and has the potential to influence the quality of care provided and patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to develop a clinical decision-making tool that standardizes care and minimizes uncertainty in assessment, diagnosis, and management. Methods First a rapid review was conducted to identify existing tools and evidence that could support a comprehensive clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain. Secondly, provincial consensus was established for the assessment, diagnosis, and management of patients presenting to primary care with shoulder pain in Alberta, Canada using a three-step modified Delphi approach. This project was a highly collaborative effort between Alberta Health Services’ Bone and Joint Health Strategic Clinical Network (BJH SCN) and the Alberta Bone and Joint Health Institute (ABJHI). Results A clinical decision-making tool for shoulder pain was developed and reached consensus by a province-wide expert panel representing various health disciplines and geographical regions. This tool consists of a clinical examination algorithm for assessing, diagnosis, and managing shoulder pain; recommendations for history-taking and identification of red flags or additional concerns; recommendations for physical examination and neurological screening; recommendations for the differential diagnosis; and care pathways for managing patients presenting with rotator cuff disease, biceps pathology, superior labral tear, adhesive capsulitis, osteoarthritis, and instability. Conclusions This clinical decision-making tool will help to standardize care, provide guidance on the diagnosis and management of shoulder pain, and assist in clinical decision-making for primary care providers in both public and private sectors.


2017 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. e2937
Author(s):  
M. Abufaraj ◽  
D. D’Andrea ◽  
R. Ristl ◽  
B. Foerster ◽  
C. Seitz ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 10 (03) ◽  
pp. 537-541
Author(s):  
Nathan Beucler ◽  
Christelle Haikal ◽  
David Hibbert ◽  
Aurore Sellier ◽  
Christophe Joubert ◽  
...  

AbstractSpontaneous acute subdural hematoma should raise clinical suspicion for underlying pathology, the most common etiology being a ruptured aneurysm. Through this case report, our team developed a clinical decision-making tool to help physicians decide when it is necessary to order an acute subdural hematoma to assess for ruptured aneurysm.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document