scholarly journals Technique Tip: Medial Prominence Bone Spur Resection In The Third-generation Percutaneous Chevron-Akin Osteotomy Technique (PECA) For Hallux Valgus Correction

Author(s):  
Gabriel Ferraz Ferreira ◽  
Gustavo Araujo Nunes ◽  
Mauro Cesar Mattos e Dinato ◽  
João Paulo Pedroso ◽  
Thomas Lorchan Lewis ◽  
...  
2019 ◽  
Vol 41 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thomas J. Holme ◽  
Sivan S. Sivaloganathan ◽  
Beejal Patel ◽  
Kumar Kunasingam

Background: Multiple operative techniques have been developed for hallux valgus with varying success. The most recent developments in minimally invasive surgery have evolved into the third-generation minimally invasive chevron Akin (MICA) osteotomy. Good results have been shown from originator centers, but this is one of the first series from a nonoriginator center, and the first to use a validated patient-reported outcome measure. Methods: Forty consecutive patients undergoing third-generation MICA for hallux valgus were included. Primary outcome measures included Manchester-Oxford Foot Questionnaire (MOXFQ) and American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) scores and Coughlin satisfaction rates at 12 months. Secondary outcome measures included radiographic parameters, complications, and recurrence rates. Results: At 12 months, the MOXFQ score improved from 58 to 10 and the AOFAS score improved from 48 to 93, with 70% of patients reporting excellent outcomes and 30% good ones. Two cases started as mild, 29 cases as moderate, and 9 cases as severe as defined by radiographic criteria. Hallux valgus angles improved from 32 degrees to 12 degrees, and intermetatarsal angles improved from 13 degrees to 7 degrees. There were 4 cases of Akin screw removal for soft tissue irritation. There were no other complications, including recurrence. Conclusion: The third-generation MICA technique was a safe and effective approach to treating hallux valgus. Further research should focus on long-term outcomes and comparative data with other commonly performed operative techniques. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


Asian Survey ◽  
1968 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 435-447 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chalmers Johnson

Controlling ◽  
2003 ◽  
Vol 15 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 129-136 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andy Neely ◽  
Bernard Marr ◽  
Göran Roos ◽  
Stephen Pike ◽  
Oliver Gupta

2014 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yenita Uswar ◽  
Amrin Saragih ◽  
Tina Mariany Arifin

The objectives of this qualitative research were (1) to identify the factors that affect the Minangkabau language (ML) maintenance in Medan, (2) to discover the parents’ efforts in maintaining ML in Medan and (3) to find out the reason why the speakers have to maintain ML. The souree of data is the nembers of the Association of Sei Jaring Community (Ikatan Warga Sei Jaring: IWS) in Medan. The sample was 10 families including 10 parents and their children. The instruments of this study are a questionnaire and an interview. The questionnaire was used to answer the factors affected the maintenance of ML and how factors affected the maintenance of ML. The interview was used to discover the influence why Minangkabau’s people have to maintain ML. There are four factors in ML maintenance, the parents’ role, the role of family, the intramarriage and homeland visits. After distributing questionnaire and did some interviews it is found that IWS especially for the third generation (children) has the danger level in ML when they communicate to each other. Meanwhile, the data analysis also shows that both fathers and mothers communicate to each other with ML. This condition occurred because of the influence of the environment. Parents have to keep communication and teaching Minangkabau language continuously to their children. so, the young generation can keep the existence of ML for their future. Keywords: Minangkabau Language Maintenance, parents’ efforts, the young generation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document