Balancing rice and non-rice crops: Managing the risks from soil constraints in Mainland Southeast Asian rice systems

2020 ◽  
Vol 246 ◽  
pp. 107677
Author(s):  
Leigh K. Vial ◽  
Anika Molesworth ◽  
Rod D.B. Lefroy
2016 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 625-629 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yongfu Qiu ◽  
Xiaozhen Jiao ◽  
Dehui Hu ◽  
Fang Liu ◽  
Fengkuan Huang ◽  
...  

1976 ◽  
Vol 29 (2) ◽  
pp. 219-225 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aung-Than-Batu ◽  
Thein-Than ◽  
Thane-Toe

2018 ◽  
Vol 77 (2) ◽  
pp. 69-82 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robin Wollast ◽  
Elisa Puvia ◽  
Philippe Bernard ◽  
Passagorn Tevichapong ◽  
Olivier Klein

Abstract. Ever since Fredrickson and Roberts (1997) proposed objectification theory, research on self-objectification and – by extension – other-objectification has experienced a considerable expansion. However, most of the studies on sexual objectification have been conducted solely in Western populations. This study investigates whether the effect of target sexualization on social perception differs as a function of culture (Western vs. Eastern). Specifically, we asked a Western sample (Belgian, N = 62) and a Southeast Asian sample (Thai, N = 98) to rate sexualized versus nonsexualized targets. We found that sexual objectification results in dehumanization in both Western (Belgium) and Eastern (Thailand) cultures. Specifically, participants from both countries attributed less competence and less agency to sexualized than to nonsexualized targets, and they reported that they would administer more intense pain to sexualized than to nonsexualized targets. Thus, building on past research, this study suggests that the effect of target sexualization on dehumanization is a more general rather than a culture-specific phenomenon.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document