Improving catch efficiency by changing ground gear design: Case study of Northeast Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery

2017 ◽  
Vol 186 ◽  
pp. 269-282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Brinkhof ◽  
Roger B. Larsen ◽  
Bent Herrmann ◽  
Eduardo Grimaldo
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
Trawl Fishery ◽  
Gear Design ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Sea Bottom ◽  
Design Case ◽  
Design Case Study

scholarly journals Effect of gear design on catch damage on cod (Gadus morhua) in the Barents Sea demersal trawl fishery

Food Control ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 107562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Brinkhof ◽  
Bent Herrmann ◽  
Manu Sistiaga ◽  
Roger B. Larsen ◽  
Nadine Jacques ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Trawl Fishery ◽  
Gear Design ◽  
The Barents Sea

scholarly journals Effect of a quality-improving cod end on size selectivity and catch patterns of cod in bottom trawl fishery

2019 ◽  
Vol 76 (11) ◽  
pp. 2110-2120 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jesse Brinkhof ◽  
Bent Herrmann ◽  
Roger B. Larsen ◽  
Tiago Veiga-Malta
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Relative Size ◽  
Bottom Trawl ◽  
Size Selectivity ◽  
Total Size ◽  
Trawl Fishery ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Sea Bottom ◽  
Significant Difference

A new cod-end concept developed and tested exhibited significantly improved quality of caught cod (Gadus morhua) compared with that of the conventional cod end used in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery. However, the design of the new quality-improving cod end raised concerns about its size selectivity and the possibility that higher retention probability could negatively impact the catch pattern by increasing the proportion of undersized cod. Therefore, the goal of this study was to quantify and compare the size selectivity and catch pattern for cod when deploying, respectively, the conventional and new quality-improving cod end in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery. The new quality-improving cod end had significantly lower relative size selectivity than the conventional cod end, but no significant difference in the catch patterns was detected in the trawl. Further, estimation of the total size selectivity in the trawl revealed that the increased retention of small cod when using the quality-improving cod end was minor. Hence, despite the reduced selectivity, the quality-improving cod end can be used with low risk of retaining small cod.

Understanding limits to cod and haddock separation using size selectivity in a multispecies trawl fishery: an application of FISHSELECT

2011 ◽  
Vol 68 (5) ◽  
pp. 927 ◽  
Author(s):  
Manu Sistiaga ◽  
Bent Herrmann ◽  
Kåre N. Nielsen ◽  
Roger B. Larsen
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
Morphological Characteristics ◽  
Melanogrammus Aeglefinus ◽  
Size Selectivity ◽  
Sea Trial ◽  
Trawl Fishery ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Morphological Differences

This investigation demonstrates how a multidisciplinary approach based on the FISHSELECT framework, sea trial data, underwater recordings, and laboratory investigations of netting can be applied to size selectivity studies and related management issues. We studied the morphological characteristics of Atlantic cod ( Gadus morhua ) and haddock ( Melanogrammus aeglefinus ) in the Barents Sea bottom trawl fishery. The differences between the L50 values (i.e., the size at which a fish has a 50% chance of being retained) that were recorded for the two species during sea trials can to a large extent be explained by the morphological differences between them. Because of these morphological differences, L50 is always larger for cod than for haddock with the grid and codend setup commonly used in the area. While catch separation of cod and haddock is a management objective in the Barents Sea, we demonstrate that the morphological differences between the species and the grid and codend setup in force today limit achievable differences in L50 to 5.5 cm. Furthermore, we show that for this fishery, the scope for increasing L50 differences between these species by changing the mesh shape configuration of the codend is minimal.

Pseudobranchial tumours in Atlantic cod, Gadus morhua L., from the Barents Sea

1981 ◽  
Vol 4 (6) ◽  
pp. 527-532 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. C. EGIDIUS ◽  
J. V. JOHANNESSEN ◽  
E. LANGE
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
The Barents Sea

scholarly journals Methods and results of in situ target-strength measurements of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) during combined trawl-acoustic surveys

2009 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 1225-1232 ◽  
Author(s):  
Viacheslav A. Ermolchev
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
Biological Data ◽  
Target Strength ◽  
Fish Length ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
Total Fish ◽  
Acoustic Surveys

Abstract Ermolchev, V. A., 2009. Methods and results of in situ target-strength measurements of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) during combined trawl-acoustic surveys. – ICES Journal of Marine Science, 66: 1225–1232. This paper presents methods for collecting acoustic and biological data, including in situ target-strength (TS) estimates of fish, with results presented for Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) obtained from combined trawl-acoustic surveys. These include fish in the small, average, and maximum length classes, within the range 5–136 cm (total fish length, LT). The investigations were done using Simrad EK500/EK60 echosounders with split-beam transducers and special post-processing software. Based on an analysis of data collected in the Barents Sea during 1998–2007, a relationship TS = 25.2 log10(LT) − 74.8 was obtained for Atlantic cod at 38 kHz, with TS in dB and LT in centimetres. Seasonally, and for depths between 50 and 500 m, the variability in cod TS was 3.1 dB, decreasing with depth. The largest day–night difference in mean TS was in August–September, with changes as large as 1.0–1.7 dB. In the other seasons, the day–night difference was <1.0 dB.

scholarly journals Diets of the Barents Sea cod (<i>Gadus morhua</i>) from the 1930s to 2018

2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 1361-1370
Author(s):  
Bryony L. Townhill ◽  
Rebecca E. Holt ◽  
Bjarte Bogstad ◽  
Joël M. Durant ◽  
John K. Pinnegar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Visual Analysis ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
Fish Diet ◽  
The North ◽  
The United Kingdom ◽  
Federal Research ◽  
The Barents Sea ◽  
The Uk

Abstract. A new dataset on the diet of Atlantic cod in the Barents Sea from the 1930s to the present day has been compiled to produce one of the largest fish diet datasets available globally. Atlantic cod is one of the most ecologically and commercially important fish species in the North Atlantic. The stock in the Barents Sea is by far the largest, as a result of both successful management and favourable environmental conditions since the early 2000s. As a top predator, cod plays a key role in the Barents Sea ecosystem. The species has a broad diet consisting mainly of crustaceans and teleost fish, and both the amount and type of prey vary in space and time. The data – from Russia, Norway and the United Kingdom – represent quantitative stomach content records from more than 400 000 fish and qualitative data from 2.5 million fish. Many of the data are from joint collaborative surveys between Norway and Russia. The sampling was conducted throughout each year, allowing for seasonal, annual and decadal comparisons to be made. Visual analysis shows cod diets have changed considerably from the start of the dataset in the 1930s to the present day. There was a large proportion of herring in the diets in the 1930s, whereas in more recent decades capelin, invertebrates and other fish dominate. There are also significant interannual asynchronous fluctuations in prey, particularly capelin and euphausiids. Combining these datasets can help us understand how the environment and ecosystems are responding to climatic changes, and what influences the diet and prey switching of cod. Trends in temperature and variability indices can be tested against the occurrence of different prey items, and the effects of fishing pressure on cod and prey stocks on diet composition could be investigated. The dataset will also enable us to improve parametrization of food web models and to forecast how Barents Sea fisheries may respond in the future to management and to climate change. The Russian data are available through joint projects with the Polar Branch of the Russian Federal Research Institute of Fisheries and Oceanography (VNIRO). The UK and Norwegian data (Townhill et al., 2020) are being released with this paper at https://doi.org/10.21335/NMDC-2139169383.

scholarly journals Ontogenetic development of otolith shape during settlement of juvenile Barents Sea cod (Gadus morhua)

2017 ◽  
Vol 74 (9) ◽  
pp. 2389-2397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Irgens ◽  
Olav S Kjesbu ◽  
Arild Folkvord
Keyword(s):  
Body Condition ◽  
Gadus Morhua ◽  
Barents Sea ◽  
Atlantic Cod ◽  
Late Summer ◽  
Simple Method ◽  
Fish Size ◽  
Otolith Shape ◽  
Reduced Body ◽  
The Barents Sea

Abstract This study documents how settlement of juvenile Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) in the Barents Sea affects otolith growth and morphology. A simple method to objectively discriminate between age 0 and age 1 cod sampled in late summer was demonstrated by using only two otolith morphometric descriptors: area and perimeter. In the pre-settled 0-group cod, otolith lobe formation clearly increased with fish size, resulting in high otolith crenulation. This trend was disrupted during settlement, resulting in noticeably less crenulated otoliths of the settled 1-group cod sampled in winter. Combined observations of otolith shape, fish size, and body condition suggest that environmental factors associated with settlement during autumn, particularly reduced food intake, directly affect lobe formation leading to less crenulated otoliths. Comparably reduced body condition and otolith crenulation of 0-group cod in bottom trawls (vs. pelagic trawls) may indicate early settlement or vertical exploratory behaviour in the Barents Sea Ecosystem Survey (in August–September) and, thus, an underrepresentation of 0-group cod from pelagic trawling.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document