scholarly journals COSMO-RS for aqueous solvation and interfaces

2016 ◽  
Vol 407 ◽  
pp. 152-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andreas Klamt
Keyword(s):  
2006 ◽  
Vol 110 (15) ◽  
pp. 7835-7844 ◽  
Author(s):  
Erwin Portuondo-Campa ◽  
Andreas Tortschanoff ◽  
Frank van Mourik ◽  
Jacques-Edouard Moser ◽  
Andreas Kornherr ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 16 (18) ◽  
pp. 8455-8464 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. I. Amaro-Estrada ◽  
L. Maron ◽  
A. Ramírez-Solís

We address the aqueous solvation of HgClOH through a systematic study of stepwise hydration considering the HgClOH–(H2O)n structures with n = 1–24.


Molecules ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 23 (12) ◽  
pp. 3269 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucas Defelipe ◽  
Juan Arcon ◽  
Carlos Modenutti ◽  
Marcelo Marti ◽  
Adrián Turjanski ◽  
...  

Simulations of molecular dynamics (MD) are playing an increasingly important role in structure-based drug discovery (SBDD). Here we review the use of MD for proteins in aqueous solvation, organic/aqueous mixed solvents (MDmix) and with small ligands, to the classic SBDD problems: Binding mode and binding free energy predictions. The simulation of proteins in their condensed state reveals solvent structures and preferential interaction sites (hot spots) on the protein surface. The information provided by water and its cosolvents can be used very effectively to understand protein ligand recognition and to improve the predictive capability of well-established methods such as molecular docking. The application of MD simulations to the study of the association of proteins with drug-like compounds is currently only possible for specific cases, as it remains computationally very expensive and labor intensive. MDmix simulations on the other hand, can be used systematically to address some of the common tasks in SBDD. With the advent of new tools and faster computers we expect to see an increase in the application of mixed solvent MD simulations to a plethora of protein targets to identify new drug candidates.


2018 ◽  
Vol 148 (10) ◽  
pp. 102306 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pablo E. Videla ◽  
Peter J. Rossky ◽  
D. Laria

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jimmy C. Kromann ◽  
Casper Steinmann ◽  
Jan Halborg Jensen

The PM6 implementation in the GAMESS program is extended to elements requiring d-integrals and interfaced with the conducter-like polarized continuum model (C-PCM) of solvation, in- cluding gradients. The accuracy of aqueous solvation energies computed using AM1, PM3, PM6, and DFTB and the SMD continuum solvation model is tested using the MNSOL data set. The errors in SMD solvation energies predicted using NDDO-based methods is considerably larger than when using DFT and HF, with RMSE values of 3.4-5.9 (neutrals) and 6-15 kcal/mol (ions) compared to 2.4 and ca 5 kcal/mol for HF/6-31G(d). For the NDDO-based methods the errors are especially large for cations and considerably higher than the corresponding COSMO results, which suggests that the NDDO/SMD results can be improved by re-parameterizing the SMD parameters focusing on ions. We found the best results are obtained by changing only the radii for hydrogen, carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, and sulfur and this leads to RMSE values for PM3 (neutrals: 2.8/ions: ca 5 kcal/mol), PM6 (4.7/ca 5 kcal/mol), and DFTB (3.9/ca 5 kcal/mol) that are more comparable to HF/6-31G(d) (2.4/ca 5 kcal/mol). Though the radii are optimized to reproduce aqueous solvation energies, they also lead more accurate predictions for other polar solvents such as DMSO, acetonitrile, and methanol, while the improvements for non-polar solvents are negligible.


2018 ◽  
Vol 57 (5) ◽  
pp. 2843-2850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alejandro Ramirez-Solis ◽  
Jorge Iván Amaro-Estrada ◽  
Jorge Hernández-Cobos ◽  
Laurent Maron

Author(s):  
Justin A. Jones ◽  
Thomas I. Harris ◽  
Brianne E. Bell ◽  
Paula F. Oliveira

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document