Protein?protein interactions and posttranslational modifications in mammalian base excision repair

2005 ◽  
Vol 38 (9) ◽  
pp. 1121-1138 ◽  
Author(s):  
J FAN ◽  
D WILSONIII
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7147
Author(s):  
Olga A. Kladova ◽  
Irina V. Alekseeva ◽  
Murat Saparbaev ◽  
Olga S. Fedorova ◽  
Nikita A. Kuznetsov

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is known to be a critical player of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that these proteins interact with APE1 either at upstream or downstream steps of BER. Therefore, we may propose that even a minor disturbance of protein–protein interactions on the DNA template reduces coordination and repair efficiency. Here, the ability of various human DNA repair enzymes (such as DNA glycosylases OGG1, UNG2, and AAG; DNA polymerase Polβ; or accessory proteins XRCC1 and PCNA) to influence the activity of wild-type (WT) APE1 and its seven natural polymorphic variants (R221C, N222H, R237A, G241R, M270T, R274Q, and P311S) was tested. Förster resonance energy transfer–based kinetic analysis of abasic site cleavage in a model DNA substrate was conducted to detect the effects of interacting proteins on the activity of WT APE1 and its single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants. The results revealed that WT APE1 activity was stimulated by almost all tested DNA repair proteins. For the SNP variants, the matters were more complicated. Analysis of two SNP variants, R237A and G241R, suggested that a positive charge in this area of the APE1 surface impairs the protein–protein interactions. In contrast, variant R221C (where the affected residue is located near the DNA-binding site) showed permanently lower activation relative to WT APE1, whereas neighboring SNP N222H did not cause a noticeable difference as compared to WT APE1. Buried substitution P311S had an inconsistent effect, whereas each substitution at the DNA-binding site, M270T and R274Q, resulted in the lowest stimulation by BER proteins. Protein–protein molecular docking was performed between repair proteins to identify amino acid residues involved in their interactions. The data uncovered differences in the effects of BER proteins on APE1, indicating an important role of protein–protein interactions in the coordination of the repair pathway.


2016 ◽  
Vol 36 (10) ◽  
pp. 1426-1437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel J. Carter ◽  
Jason L. Parsons

Base excision repair (BER) is an essential DNA repair pathway involved in the maintenance of genome stability and thus in the prevention of human diseases, such as premature aging, neurodegenerative diseases, and cancer. Protein posttranslational modifications (PTMs), including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation, SUMOylation, and ubiquitylation, have emerged as important contributors in controlling cellular BER protein levels, enzymatic activities, protein-protein interactions, and protein cellular localization. These PTMs therefore play key roles in regulating the BER pathway and are consequently crucial for coordinating an efficient cellular DNA damage response. In this review, we summarize the presently available data on characterized PTMs of key BER proteins, the functional consequences of these modifications at the protein level, and also the impact on BERin vitroandin vivo.


2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 6308
Author(s):  
David J. López ◽  
José A. Rodríguez ◽  
Sonia Bañuelos

APE1 (DNA (apurinic/apyrimidinic site) endonuclease 1) is a key enzyme of one of the major DNA repair routes, the BER (base excision repair) pathway. APE1 fulfils additional functions, acting as a redox regulator of transcription factors and taking part in RNA metabolism. The mechanisms regulating APE1 are still being deciphered. Structurally, human APE1 consists of a well-characterized globular catalytic domain responsible for its endonuclease activity, preceded by a conformationally flexible N-terminal extension, acquired along evolution. This N-terminal tail appears to play a prominent role in the modulation of APE1 and probably in BER coordination. Thus, it is primarily involved in mediating APE1 localization, post-translational modifications, and protein–protein interactions, with all three factors jointly contributing to regulate the enzyme. In this review, recent insights on the regulatory role of the N-terminal region in several aspects of APE1 function are covered. In particular, interaction of this region with nucleophosmin (NPM1) might modulate certain APE1 activities, representing a paradigmatic example of the interconnection between various regulatory factors.


2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Shimizu ◽  
Yasuhiro Uchimura ◽  
Naoshi Dohmae ◽  
Hisato Saitoh ◽  
Fumio Hanaoka ◽  
...  

We showed that XPC complex, which is a DNA damage detector for nucleotide excision repair, stimulates activity of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) that initiates base excision repair. XPC appeared to facilitate the enzymatic turnover of TDG by promoting displacement from its own product abasic site, although the precise mechanism underlying this stimulation has not been clarified. Here we show that XPC has only marginal effects on the activity ofE. coliTDG homolog (EcMUG), which remains bound to the abasic site like human TDG but does not significantly interacts with XPC. On the contrary, XPC significantly stimulates the activities of sumoylated TDG and SMUG1, both of which exhibit quite different enzymatic kinetics from unmodified TDG but interact with XPC. These results point to importance of physical interactions for stimulation of DNA glycosylases by XPC and have implications in the molecular mechanisms underlying mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in XP-C patients.


2002 ◽  
Vol 75 (5) ◽  
pp. 507 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine J. Kim ◽  
Indraneel Chakrabarty ◽  
Guang-Zhi Li ◽  
Sabine Grösch ◽  
Bernd Kaina ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Richarda de Voer ◽  
Paul W Doetsch ◽  
Roland Kuiper ◽  
Barbara Rivera

2018 ◽  
Vol 482 (1) ◽  
pp. 96-100
Author(s):  
E. Belousova ◽  
◽  
M. Kutuzov ◽  
P. Ivankina ◽  
A. Ishchenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document