scholarly journals Modulation of the Apurinic/Apyrimidinic Endonuclease Activity of Human APE1 and of Its Natural Polymorphic Variants by Base Excision Repair Proteins

2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (19) ◽  
pp. 7147
Author(s):  
Olga A. Kladova ◽  
Irina V. Alekseeva ◽  
Murat Saparbaev ◽  
Olga S. Fedorova ◽  
Nikita A. Kuznetsov
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Binding Site ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Glycosylases ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Dna Binding Site ◽  
Polymorphic Variants ◽  
Base Excision

Human apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1 (APE1) is known to be a critical player of the base excision repair (BER) pathway. In general, BER involves consecutive actions of DNA glycosylases, AP endonucleases, DNA polymerases, and DNA ligases. It is known that these proteins interact with APE1 either at upstream or downstream steps of BER. Therefore, we may propose that even a minor disturbance of protein–protein interactions on the DNA template reduces coordination and repair efficiency. Here, the ability of various human DNA repair enzymes (such as DNA glycosylases OGG1, UNG2, and AAG; DNA polymerase Polβ; or accessory proteins XRCC1 and PCNA) to influence the activity of wild-type (WT) APE1 and its seven natural polymorphic variants (R221C, N222H, R237A, G241R, M270T, R274Q, and P311S) was tested. Förster resonance energy transfer–based kinetic analysis of abasic site cleavage in a model DNA substrate was conducted to detect the effects of interacting proteins on the activity of WT APE1 and its single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) variants. The results revealed that WT APE1 activity was stimulated by almost all tested DNA repair proteins. For the SNP variants, the matters were more complicated. Analysis of two SNP variants, R237A and G241R, suggested that a positive charge in this area of the APE1 surface impairs the protein–protein interactions. In contrast, variant R221C (where the affected residue is located near the DNA-binding site) showed permanently lower activation relative to WT APE1, whereas neighboring SNP N222H did not cause a noticeable difference as compared to WT APE1. Buried substitution P311S had an inconsistent effect, whereas each substitution at the DNA-binding site, M270T and R274Q, resulted in the lowest stimulation by BER proteins. Protein–protein molecular docking was performed between repair proteins to identify amino acid residues involved in their interactions. The data uncovered differences in the effects of BER proteins on APE1, indicating an important role of protein–protein interactions in the coordination of the repair pathway.

scholarly journals The Base Excision Repair Pathway in the Nematode Caenorhabditis elegans

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Elsakrmy ◽  
Qiu-Mei Zhang-Akiyama ◽  
Dindial Ramotar
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Caenorhabditis Elegans ◽  
Dna Polymerase ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Glycosylases ◽  
Repair Synthesis ◽  
C Elegans ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Dna Repair Synthesis

Exogenous and endogenous damage to the DNA is inevitable. Several DNA repair pathways including base excision, nucleotide excision, mismatch, homologous and non-homologous recombinations are conserved across all organisms to faithfully maintain the integrity of the genome. The base excision repair (BER) pathway functions to repair single-base DNA lesions and during the process creates the premutagenic apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) sites. In this review, we discuss the components of the BER pathway in the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans and delineate the different phenotypes caused by the deletion or the knockdown of the respective DNA repair gene, as well as the implications. To date, two DNA glycosylases have been identified in C. elegans, the monofunctional uracil DNA glycosylase-1 (UNG-1) and the bifunctional endonuclease III-1 (NTH-1) with associated AP lyase activity. In addition, the animal possesses two AP endonucleases belonging to the exonuclease-3 and endonuclease IV families and in C. elegans these enzymes are called EXO-3 and APN-1, respectively. In mammalian cells, the DNA polymerase, Pol beta, that is required to reinsert the correct bases for DNA repair synthesis is not found in the genome of C. elegans and the evidence indicates that this role could be substituted by DNA polymerase theta (POLQ), which is known to perform a function in the microhomology-mediated end-joining pathway in human cells. The phenotypes observed by the C. elegans mutant strains of the BER pathway raised many challenging questions including the possibility that the DNA glycosylases may have broader functional roles, as discuss in this review.

Associations between DNA Damage, DNA Base Excision Repair Gene Variability and Alzheimer's Disease Risk

2016 ◽  
Vol 41 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 152-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dominik Kwiatkowski ◽  
Piotr Czarny ◽  
Monika Toma ◽  
Natalia Jurkowska ◽  
Agnieszka Sliwinska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Alzheimer’S Disease ◽  
Alzheimer's Disease ◽  
Dna Damage ◽  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Lesions ◽  
Polymorphic Variants ◽  
Base Excision

Background: Increased oxidative damage to DNA is one of the pathways involved in Alzheimer's disease (AD). Insufficient base excision repair (BER) is in part responsible for increased oxidative DNA damage. The aim of the present study was to assess the effect of polymorphic variants of BER-involved genes and the peripheral markers of DNA damage and repair in patients with AD. Material and Methods: Comet assays and TaqMan probes were used to assess DNA damage, BER efficiency and polymorphic variants of 12 BER genes in blood samples from 105 AD patients and 130 controls. The DNA repair efficacy (DRE) was calculated according to a specific equation. Results: The levels of endogenous and oxidative DNA damages were higher in AD patients than controls. The polymorphic variants of XRCC1 c.580C>T XRCC1 c.1196A>G and OGG1 c.977C>G are associated with increased DNA damage in AD. Conclusion: Our results show that oxidative stress and disturbances in DRE are particularly responsible for the elevated DNA lesions in AD. The results suggest that oxidative stress and disruption in DNA repair may contribute to increased DNA damage in AD patients and risk of this disease. In addition, disturbances in DRE may be associated with polymorphisms of OGG1 and XRCC1.

scholarly journals Molecular Mechanisms Regulating the DNA Repair Protein APE1: A Focus on Its Flexible N-Terminal Tail Domain

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 6308
Author(s):  
David J. López ◽  
José A. Rodríguez ◽  
Sonia Bañuelos
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Catalytic Domain ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Tail Domain ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
Key Enzyme ◽  
Dna Repair Protein ◽  
Base Excision

APE1 (DNA (apurinic/apyrimidinic site) endonuclease 1) is a key enzyme of one of the major DNA repair routes, the BER (base excision repair) pathway. APE1 fulfils additional functions, acting as a redox regulator of transcription factors and taking part in RNA metabolism. The mechanisms regulating APE1 are still being deciphered. Structurally, human APE1 consists of a well-characterized globular catalytic domain responsible for its endonuclease activity, preceded by a conformationally flexible N-terminal extension, acquired along evolution. This N-terminal tail appears to play a prominent role in the modulation of APE1 and probably in BER coordination. Thus, it is primarily involved in mediating APE1 localization, post-translational modifications, and protein–protein interactions, with all three factors jointly contributing to regulate the enzyme. In this review, recent insights on the regulatory role of the N-terminal region in several aspects of APE1 function are covered. In particular, interaction of this region with nucleophosmin (NPM1) might modulate certain APE1 activities, representing a paradigmatic example of the interconnection between various regulatory factors.

scholarly journals Stimulation of DNA Glycosylase Activities by XPC Protein Complex: Roles of Protein-Protein Interactions

2010 ◽  
Vol 2010 ◽  
pp. 1-12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuichiro Shimizu ◽  
Yasuhiro Uchimura ◽  
Naoshi Dohmae ◽  
Hisato Saitoh ◽  
Fumio Hanaoka ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Protein Interactions ◽  
Molecular Mechanisms ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Dna Glycosylase ◽  
Abasic Site ◽  
Dna Glycosylases ◽  
Protein Protein Interactions ◽  
E Coli ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Stimulation Of

We showed that XPC complex, which is a DNA damage detector for nucleotide excision repair, stimulates activity of thymine DNA glycosylase (TDG) that initiates base excision repair. XPC appeared to facilitate the enzymatic turnover of TDG by promoting displacement from its own product abasic site, although the precise mechanism underlying this stimulation has not been clarified. Here we show that XPC has only marginal effects on the activity ofE. coliTDG homolog (EcMUG), which remains bound to the abasic site like human TDG but does not significantly interacts with XPC. On the contrary, XPC significantly stimulates the activities of sumoylated TDG and SMUG1, both of which exhibit quite different enzymatic kinetics from unmodified TDG but interact with XPC. These results point to importance of physical interactions for stimulation of DNA glycosylases by XPC and have implications in the molecular mechanisms underlying mutagenesis and carcinogenesis in XP-C patients.

scholarly journals Effect of DNA Glycosylases OGG1 and Neil1 on Oxidized G-Rich Motif in the KRAS Promoter

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 1137
Author(s):  
Annalisa Ferino ◽  
Luigi E. Xodo
Keyword(s):  
Oxidative Stress ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Start Site ◽  
Dna Glycosylases ◽  
Repair Pathway ◽  
Transcription Start ◽  
G Quadruplex ◽  
Base Excision ◽  
Regulatory Functions

The promoter of the Kirsten ras (KRAS) proto-oncogene contains, upstream of the transcription start site, a quadruplex-forming motif called 32R with regulatory functions. As guanine under oxidative stress can be oxidized to 8-oxoguanine (8OG), we investigated the capacity of glycosylases 8-oxoguanine glycosylase (OGG1) and endonuclease VIII-like 1 (Neil1) to excise 8OG from 32R, either in duplex or G-quadruplex (G4) conformation. We found that OGG1 efficiently excised 8OG from oxidized 32R in duplex but not in G4 conformation. By contrast, glycosylase Neil1 showed more activity on the G4 than the duplex conformation. We also found that the excising activity of Neil1 on folded 32R depended on G4 topology. Our data suggest that Neil1, besides being involved in base excision repair pathway (BER), could play a role on KRAS transcription.

Incorporation of 5’,8-cyclo-2’deoxyadenosines by DNA repair polymerases via base excision repair

DNA Repair ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 103258
Author(s):  
Pawlos S. Tsegay ◽  
Daniela Hernandez ◽  
Christopher Brache ◽  
Chryssostomos Chatgilialoglu ◽  
Marios G. Krokidis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Dna Repair ◽  
Base Excision Repair ◽  
Excision Repair ◽  
Base Excision
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document