Surface area controls gas hydrate dissociation kinetics in porous media

Fuel ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 234 ◽  
pp. 358-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiongyu Chen ◽  
D. Nicolas Espinoza
2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuke Ruan ◽  
Chun-Gang Xu ◽  
Ke-Feng Yan ◽  
Xiao-Sen Li

The hydrate decomposition kinetics is a key factor for the gas production from hydrate-saturated porous media. Meanwhile, it is also related to other factors. Among them, the permeability and hydrate dissociation surface area on hydrate dissociation kinetics have been studied experimentally and numerically in this work. First, the permeability to water was experimentally determined at different hydrate saturations (0%, 10%, 17%, 21%, 34%, 40.5%, and 48.75%) in hydrate-bearing porous media. By the comparison of permeability results from the experimental measurements and theoretical calculations with the empirical permeability models, it was found that, for the lower hydrate saturations (less than 40%), the experimental results of water permeability are closer to the predicted values of the grain-coating permeability model, whereas, for the hydrate saturation above 40%, the tendencies of hydrate accumulation in porous media are quite consistent with the pore-filling hydrate habits. A developed two-dimensional core-scale numerical code, which incorporates the models for permeability and hydrate dissociation surface area along with the hydrate accumulation habits in porous media, was used to investigate the kinetics of hydrate dissociation by depressurization, and a “shrinking-core” hydrate dissociation driven by the radial heat transfer was found in the numerical simulations of hydrate dissociation induced by depressurization in core-scale porous media. The numerical results indicate that the gas production from hydrates in porous media has a strong dependence on the permeability and hydrate dissociation surface area. Meanwhile, the simulation shows that the controlling factor for the dissociation kinetics of hydrate switches from permeability to hydrate dissociation surface area depending on the hydrate saturation and hydrate accumulation habits in porous media.


2005 ◽  
Vol 109 (36) ◽  
pp. 17205-17211 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christophe Dicharry ◽  
Pascal Gayet ◽  
Gérard Marion ◽  
Alain Graciaa ◽  
Anatoliy N. Nesterov

1991 ◽  
Vol 6 (01) ◽  
pp. 69-76 ◽  
Author(s):  
M.H. Yousif ◽  
H.H. Abass ◽  
M.S. Selim ◽  
E.D. Sloan

2020 ◽  
Vol 205 ◽  
pp. 11004
Author(s):  
Zaher Jarrar ◽  
Riyadh Al-Raoush ◽  
Khalid Alshibli ◽  
Jongwon Jung

The availability of natural gas hydrates and the continuing increase in energy demand, motivated researchers to consider gas hydrates as a future source of energy. Fundamental understanding of hydrate dissociation kinetics is essential to improve techniques of gas production from natural hydrates reservoirs. During hydrate dissociation, bonds between water (host molecules) and gas (guest molecules) break and free gas is released. This paper investigates the evolution of hydrate surface area, pore habit, and tortuosity using in-situ imaging of Xenon (Xe) hydrate formation and dissociation in porous media with dynamic three-dimensional synchrotron microcomputed tomography (SMT). Xe hydrate was formed inside a high- pressure, low-temperature cell and then dissociated by thermal stimulation. During formation and dissociation, full 3D SMT scans were acquired continuously and reconstructed into 3D volume images. Each scan took only 45 seconds to complete, and a total of 60 scans were acquired. Hydrate volume and surface area evolution were directly measured from the SMT scans. At low hydrate saturation, the predominant pore habit was surface coating, while the predominant pore habit at high hydrate saturation was pore filling. A second-degree polynomial can be used to predict variation of tortuosity with hydrate saturation with an R2 value of 0.997.


Fuel ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 265 ◽  
pp. 116978 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zaher A. Jarrar ◽  
Khalid A. Alshibli ◽  
Riyadh I. Al-Raoush ◽  
Jongwon Jung

2017 ◽  
Vol 53 (5) ◽  
pp. 787-793
Author(s):  
Jianzhong Zhao ◽  
Yaqin Tian ◽  
Yangsheng Zhao ◽  
Weiguo Liang

2013 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 339-346 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Sh. Shagapov ◽  
M. K. Khasanov ◽  
I. K. Gimaltdinov ◽  
M. V. Stolpovsky

2021 ◽  
pp. 133830
Author(s):  
Youqiang Liao ◽  
Zhiyuan Wang ◽  
Xiaohui Sun ◽  
Wenqiang Lou ◽  
Hui Liu ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document