scholarly journals X-mode raw data analysis of the new AUG ICRF antenna edge density profile reflectometer

2017 ◽  
Vol 123 ◽  
pp. 816-819 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.E. Aguiam ◽  
A. Silva ◽  
V. Bobkov ◽  
P.J. Carvalho ◽  
P.F. Carvalho ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessandra Maciel Paz Milani ◽  
Fernando V. Paulovich ◽  
Isabel Harb Manssour

Analyzing and managing raw data are still a challenging part of the data analysis process, mainly regarding data preprocessing. Although we can find studies proposing design implications or recommendations for visualization solutions in the data analysis scope, they do not focus on challenges during the preprocessing phase. Likewise, the current Visual Analytics processes do not consider preprocessing an equally important stage in their process. Thus, with this study, we aim to contribute to the discussion of how we can use and combine methods of visualization and data mining to assist data analysts during the preprocessing activities. To achieve that, we introduce the Preprocessing Profiling Model for Visual Analytics, which contemplates a set of features to inspire the implementation of new solutions. In turn, these features were designed considering a list of insights we obtained during an interview study with thirteen data analysts. Our contributions can be summarized as offering resources to promote a shift to a visual preprocessing.


2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Melanie Christine Föll ◽  
Veronika Volkmann ◽  
Kathrin Enderle-Ammour ◽  
Konrad Wilhelm ◽  
Dan Guo ◽  
...  

Background: Mass spectrometry imaging (MSI) derives spatial molecular distribution maps directly from clinical tissue specimens. This allows for spatial characterization of molecular compositions of different tissue types and tumor subtypes, which bears great potential for assisting pathologists with diagnostic decisions or personalized treatments. Unfortunately, progress in translational MSI is often hindered by insufficient quality control and lack of reproducible data analysis. Raw data and analysis scripts are rarely publicly shared. Here, we demonstrate the application of the Galaxy MSI tool set for the reproducible analysis of an urothelial carcinoma dataset. Methods: Tryptic peptides were imaged in a cohort of 39 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded human urothelial cancer tissue cores with a MALDI-TOF/TOF device. The complete data analysis was performed in a fully transparent and reproducible manner on the European Galaxy Server. Annotations of tumor and stroma were performed by a pathologist and transferred to the MSI data to allow for supervised classifications of tumor vs. stroma tissue areas as well as for muscle-infiltrating and non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinomas. For putative peptide identifications, m/z features were matched to the MSiMass list. Results: Rigorous quality control in combination with careful pre-processing enabled reduction of m/z shifts and intensity batch effects. High classification accuracy was found for both, tumor vs. stroma and muscle-infiltrating vs. non-muscle invasive tumors. Some of the most discriminative m/z features for each condition could be assigned a putative identity: Stromal tissue was characterized by collagen type I peptides and tumor tissue by histone and heat shock protein beta-1 peptides. Intermediate filaments such as cytokeratins and vimentin were discriminative between the tumors with different muscle-infiltration status. To make the study fully reproducible and to advocate the criteria of FAIR (findability, accessibility, interoperability, and reusability) research data, we share the raw data, spectra annotations as well as all Galaxy histories and workflows. Data are available via ProteomeXchange with identifier PXD026459 and Galaxy results via https://github.com/foellmelanie/Bladder_MSI_Manuscript_Galaxy_links. Conclusion: Here, we show that translational MSI data analysis in a fully transparent and reproducible manner is possible and we would like to encourage the community to join our efforts.


1995 ◽  
Vol 37 (9) ◽  
pp. 925-935 ◽  
Author(s):  
E de la Luna ◽  
G Hanson ◽  
J Sanchez ◽  
J B Wilgen ◽  
V A Zhuravlev ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 158 (5) ◽  
pp. 1147-1180 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Can ◽  
P. J. Forrester ◽  
G. Téllez ◽  
P. Wiegmann

2016 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 20150057
Author(s):  
Gokhan Kilic ◽  
Mehmet S. Unluturk

2016 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 025004 ◽  
Author(s):  
L M Shao ◽  
E Wolfrum ◽  
F Ryter ◽  
G Birkenmeier ◽  
F M Laggner ◽  
...  

1981 ◽  
Vol 21 (10) ◽  
pp. 1259-1264 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Stevens ◽  
M. Ono ◽  
R. Horton ◽  
J.R. Wilson

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shannon E Ellis ◽  
Jeffrey T Leek

Within the statistics community, a number of guiding principles for sharing data have emerged; however, these principles are not always made clear to collaborators generating the data. To bridge this divide, we have established a set of guidelines for sharing data. In these, we highlight the need to provide raw data to the statistician, the importance of consistent formatting, and the necessity of including all essential experimental information and pre-processing steps carried out to the statistician. With these guidelines we hope to avoid errors and delays in data analysis.


1977 ◽  
Vol 19 (81) ◽  
pp. 375-387 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Föhn ◽  
W. Good ◽  
P. Bois ◽  
C. Obled

Abstract Principal problems concerning the raw data and methodological limitations of statistical and conventional avalanche forecasting methods are summarized. The concepts of four statistical models based on multivariate data analysis, are outlined in a few words. In order to give an idea of the potential and quality of the different methods, test runs over two winters are discussed and a tentative store is established. Statistical models I and IV, together with the conventional forecast, attain a score of 70-80%, whereas statistical models II and III show a slightly poorer performance.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document