Ankle-foot orthoses that restrict dorsiflexion improve walking in polio survivors with calf muscle weakness

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 391-398 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilde E. Ploeger ◽  
Sicco A. Bus ◽  
Merel-Anne Brehm ◽  
Frans Nollet
Author(s):  
Niels F. J. Waterval ◽  
Merel-Anne Brehm ◽  
Jaap Harlaar ◽  
Frans Nollet

Abstract Background In people with calf muscle weakness, the stiffness of dorsal leaf spring ankle–foot orthoses (DLS-AFO) needs to be individualized to maximize its effect on walking. Orthotic suppliers may recommend a certain stiffness based on body weight and activity level. However, it is unknown whether these recommendations are sufficient to yield the optimal stiffness for the individual. Therefore, we assessed whether the stiffness following the supplier’s recommendation of the Carbon Ankle7 (CA7) dorsal leaf matched the experimentally optimized AFO stiffness. Methods Thirty-four persons with calf muscle weakness were included and provided a new DLS-AFO of which the stiffness could be varied by changing the CA7® (Ottobock, Duderstadt, Germany) dorsal leaf. For five different stiffness levels, including the supplier recommended stiffness, gait biomechanics, walking energy cost and speed were assessed. Based on these measures, the individual experimentally optimal AFO stiffness was selected. Results In only 8 of 34 (23%) participants, the supplier recommended stiffness matched the experimentally optimized AFO stiffness, the latter being on average 1.2 ± 1.3 Nm/degree more flexible. The DLS-AFO with an experimentally optimized stiffness resulted in a significantly lower walking energy cost (− 0.21 ± 0.26 J/kg/m, p < 0.001) and a higher speed (+ 0.02 m/s, p = 0.003). Additionally, a larger ankle range of motion (+ 1.3 ± 0.3 degrees, p < 0.001) and higher ankle power (+ 0.16 ± 0.04 W/kg, p < 0.001) were found with the experimentally optimized stiffness compared to the supplier recommended stiffness. Conclusions In people with calf muscle weakness, current supplier’s recommendations for the CA7 stiffness level result in the provision of DLS-AFOs that are too stiff and only achieve 80% of the reduction in energy cost achieved with an individual optimized stiffness. It is recommended to experimentally optimize the CA7 stiffness in people with calf muscle weakness in order to maximize treatment outcomes. Trial registration Nederlands Trial Register 5170. Registration date: May 7th 2015. http://www.trialregister.nl/trialreg/admin/rctview.asp?TC=5170.


2021 ◽  
Vol 2021 (9) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elza van Duijnhoven ◽  
Niels F Waterval ◽  
Fieke Sophia Koopman ◽  
Alberto Esquenazi ◽  
Sarah Tyson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Bart Raijmakers ◽  
Roelofine A. Berendsen-de Gooijer ◽  
Hilde E. Ploeger ◽  
Fieke S. Koopman ◽  
Frans Nollet ◽  
...  

Objective: To investigate the use of custom-made knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life and differences in usability factors of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses between users and discontinued users. Design: Cross-sectional survey study. Subjects: A total of 163 polio survivors provided with a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis at an outpatient clinic of a university hospital. Methods: Use and usability of knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life were assessed with a postal questionnaire. Usability factors were formulated using the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 9241-11 standard. Results: A total of 106 respondents (65%) returned the questionnaire. Of these, 98 were eligible for analysis. Seventy-four respondents (76%) reported using their knee-ankle-foot-orthosis. Compared with discontinued users (24%), users experienced more limitations when walking without an orthosis (p = 0.001), were more often experienced with wearing a previous orthosis (p < 0.001) and were more often prescribed with a locked rather than a stance-control knee-ankle-foot-orthosis (p = 0.015). Furthermore, users reported better effectiveness of their knee-ankle-foot-orthosis (p < 0.001), more satisfaction with goals of use and knee-ankle-foot-orthosis-related aspects (p < 0.001). Conclusion: The majority of polio survivors used their custom-made knee-ankle-foot-orthoses in daily life. Factors related to continued use, such as walking ability without orthosis, expectations of the orthosis, previous orthosis experience and type of knee-ankle-foot-orthosis provided, should be considered and discussed when prescribing a knee-ankle-foot-orthosis in polio survivors. 


2015 ◽  
Vol 40 (2) ◽  
pp. 202-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masoud Rafiaei ◽  
Mahmood Bahramizadeh ◽  
Mokhtar Arazpour ◽  
Mohammad Samadian ◽  
Stephen W Hutchins ◽  
...  

Background: The use of knee–ankle–foot orthoses with drop locked knee joints produces some limitations for walking in subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness. The development of stance control orthoses can potentially improve their functionality. Objectives: The aim of this review was to compare the evidence of the effect of stance control orthoses to knee–ankle–foot orthoses with drop locked knee joints in improving kinematic variables and energy efficiency of walking by subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness caused by different pathologies. Study design: Literature review. Methods: Based on selected keywords and their composition, a search was performed in Google Scholar, PubMed, ScienceDirect, and ISI Web of Knowledge databases. In total, 18 articles were finally chosen for review. Results: The results of this study demonstrated that this type of orthosis can improve the walking parameters of subjects with quadriceps muscle weakness and spinal cord injury patients when compared to a locked knee–ankle–foot orthosis. Conclusion: There is evidence to show that stance control orthosis designs improve the gait kinematics but not energetic of knee–ankle–foot orthosis users. Development of new designs of stance control orthoses to provide a more normal pattern of walking is still required. Clinical relevance Stance control orthoses are a new generation of orthotic intervention that could potentially be significant in assisting to improve the gait kinematics by knee–ankle–foot orthosis users.


2017 ◽  
Vol 58 ◽  
pp. 146-153 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hilde E. Ploeger ◽  
Sicco A. Bus ◽  
Frans Nollet ◽  
Merel-Anne Brehm

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document