Instrumental assessment of cervical spine mobility in patients with whiplash injury for forensic application

2014 ◽  
Vol 40 ◽  
pp. S14-S15
Author(s):  
P. Zucchetto ◽  
M.G. Benedetti ◽  
C. Frigo
Spine ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 21 (3) ◽  
pp. 392-397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bogdan P. Radanov ◽  
Jiri Dvorak

Injury ◽  
1989 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 265-266 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Hildingsson ◽  
S.-O. Hietala ◽  
G. Toolanen

MediAl ◽  
2019 ◽  
pp. 47-53
Author(s):  
A. V. Yarikov ◽  
О. A. Perlmutter ◽  
A. P. Fraerman ◽  
A. A. Boyarshinov ◽  
A. N. Lavrenyuk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Brian D. Stemper ◽  
Narayan Yoganandan ◽  
Frank A. Pintar

The present study implemented the MADYMO 50th percentile male head-neck model to investigate effects of initial spinal posture on cervical spine kinematics in whiplash. The model was altered to three initial postures: lordosis, straight, kyphosis. The three models were exercised under 2.6 m/sec rear impact pulses. Segmental kinematics and ligament strains were investigated during cervical S-curvature and throughout the whiplash event. Anterior longitudinal ligament strains during S-curvature varied from 20 to 47% of maximum strains. Facet joint strains during S-curvature were 42 to 100% of maximum strains. This finding indicates that facet joint ligaments are more susceptible to whiplash injury during S-curvature, while anterior longitudinal ligament injury likely occurs during the extension phase. Kyphosis and straight postures increased anterior longitudinal ligament strains in the upper cervical spine from the lordosis posture. Lower cervical facet joint and anterior longitudinal ligament strains were greater in the lordosis posture. This study shows that spinal posture may affect injury mechanisms and render a specific population more susceptible to whiplash injury.


2020 ◽  
Vol 33 (6) ◽  
pp. 961-967
Author(s):  
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren ◽  
Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz ◽  
Miguel Malo-Urriés ◽  
César Hidalgo-García ◽  
José Miguel Tricás-Moreno ◽  
...  

BACKGROUND: Damage on the somatosensory system could cause sensation of dizziness, a condition known as cervicogenic dizziness (CD). Manual physical therapy has shown beneficial effects, relieving the symptoms of cervicogenic dizziness. However, the effect of upper cervical spine manipulation is unknown, as this is a technique that respects the International Federation of Orthopedic Manipulative Physical Therapists (IFOMPT) safety criteria. OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of upper cervical spine traction-manipulation in subjects with cervicogenic dizziness. METHODS: This was a descriptive case series study. Treatment focused on the upper cervical spine manipulation procedure. Evaluation was performed before and after the treatment. Variables recorded include upper and lower cervical range of motion, Cervical Flexion-Rotation Test (CFRT), dizziness intensity and cervical pain (VAS), self-perceived dizziness measured with Dizziness Handicap Inventory (DHI) and subjective perception of outcome (GROC-scale). RESULTS: Ten subjects were recruited. After the treatment protocol, there was an increased range of movement towards the most restricted side, as measured by the CFRT (p< 0.001), decreased intensity of dizziness (p< 0.001) and intensity of pain (p< 0.001). Functional capacity also improved after the intervention (p< 0.011). CONCLUSION: Upper cervical spine manipulation may decrease dizziness intensity and cervical pain and improve functional ability and upper cervical spine mobility in patients with cervicogenic dizziness.


2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawid Aleksandrowicz ◽  
Tomasz Gaszyński

Airway management in patients with suspected cervical spine injury plays an important role in the pathway of care of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different airway devices during intubation of a patient with reduced cervical spine mobility. Forty students of the third year of emergency medicine studies participated in the study (F=26,M=14). The time required to obtain a view of the entry to the larynx and successful ventilation time were recorded. Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view and damage to the incisors were also assessed. All three airway devices were used by each student (a novice) and they were randomly chosen. The mean time required to obtain the entry-to-the-larynx view was the shortest for the Macintosh laryngoscope 13.4 s (±2.14). Truview Evo2 had the shortest successful ventilation time 35.7 s (±9.27). The best view of the entry to the larynx was obtained by the Totaltrack VLM device. The Truview Evo2 and Totaltrack VLM may be an alternative to the classic Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of trauma patients with suspected injury to the cervical spine. The use of new devices enables achieving better laryngoscopic view as well as minimising incisor damage during intubation.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document