scholarly journals Airway Management with Cervical Spine Immobilisation: A Comparison between the Macintosh Laryngoscope, Truview Evo2, and Totaltrack VLM Used by Novices—A Manikin Study

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-5 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dawid Aleksandrowicz ◽  
Tomasz Gaszyński
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Laryngoscopic View ◽  
Ventilation Time ◽  
Spine Mobility ◽  
Airway Devices ◽  
Time Required

Airway management in patients with suspected cervical spine injury plays an important role in the pathway of care of trauma patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate three different airway devices during intubation of a patient with reduced cervical spine mobility. Forty students of the third year of emergency medicine studies participated in the study (F=26,M=14). The time required to obtain a view of the entry to the larynx and successful ventilation time were recorded. Cormack-Lehane laryngoscopic view and damage to the incisors were also assessed. All three airway devices were used by each student (a novice) and they were randomly chosen. The mean time required to obtain the entry-to-the-larynx view was the shortest for the Macintosh laryngoscope 13.4 s (±2.14). Truview Evo2 had the shortest successful ventilation time 35.7 s (±9.27). The best view of the entry to the larynx was obtained by the Totaltrack VLM device. The Truview Evo2 and Totaltrack VLM may be an alternative to the classic Macintosh laryngoscope for intubation of trauma patients with suspected injury to the cervical spine. The use of new devices enables achieving better laryngoscopic view as well as minimising incisor damage during intubation.

Airway management: Uncleared cervical spine injury

2005 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 99-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
TVSP Murthy ◽  
Parmeet Bhatia ◽  
RL Gogna ◽  
T Prabhakar
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Spine Injury

Comparison of the Bullard and Macintosh Laryngoscopes for Endotracheal Intubation of Patients with a Potential Cervical Spine Injury 

1997 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. 1335-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew D. J. Watts ◽  
Adrian W. Gelb ◽  
David B. Bach ◽  
David M. Pelz
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Endotracheal Intubation ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Cricoid Pressure ◽  
Macintosh Laryngoscope ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Neck Extension ◽  
Bullard Laryngoscope ◽  
Spine Movement

Background In the emergency trauma situation, in-line stabilization (ILS) of the cervical spine is used to reduce head and neck extension during laryngoscopy. The Bullard laryngoscope may result in less cervical spine movement than the Macintosh laryngoscope. The aim of this study was to compare cervical spine extension (measured radiographically) and time to intubation with the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes during a simulated emergency with cervical spine precautions taken. Methods Twenty-nine patients requiring general anesthesia and endotracheal intubation were studied. Patients were placed on a rigid board and anesthesia was induced. Laryngoscopy was performed on four occasions: with the Bullard and Macintosh laryngoscopes both with and without manual ILS. Cricoid pressure was applied with ILS. To determine cervical spine extension, radiographs were exposed before and during laryngoscopy. Times to intubation and grade view of the larynx were also compared. Results Cervical spine extension (occiput-C5) was greatest with the Macintosh laryngoscope (25.9 degrees +/- 2.8 degrees). Extension was reduced when using the Macintosh laryngoscope with ILS (12.9 +/- 2.1 degrees) and the Bullard laryngoscope without stabilization (12.6 +/- 1.8 degrees; P < 0.05). Times to intubation were similar for the Macintosh laryngoscope with ILS (20.3 +/- 12.8 s) and for the Bullard without ILS (25.6 +/- 10.4 s). Manual ILS with the Bullard laryngoscope results in further reduction in cervical spine extension (5.6 +/- 1.5 degrees) but prolongs time to intubation (40.3 +/- 19.5 s; P < 0.05). Conclusions Cervical spine extension and time to intubation are similar for the Macintosh laryngoscope with ILS and the Bullard laryngoscope without ILS. However, time to intubation is significantly prolonged when the Bullard laryngoscope is used in a simulated emergency with cervical spine precautions taken. This suggests that the Bullard laryngoscope may be a useful adjunct to intubation of patients with potential cervical spine injury when time to intubation is not critical.

scholarly journals Cervical Spine Injury in Burned Trauma Patients: Incidence, Predictors, and Outcomes

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (3) ◽  
pp. 263-268
Author(s):  
Laura A Galganski ◽  
Jessica A Cox ◽  
David G Greenhalgh ◽  
Soman Sen ◽  
Kathleen S Romanowski ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients

scholarly journals LO027: Cervical spine injury in trauma patients 65 years and older immobilised in the prehospital setting

CJEM ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 18 (S1) ◽  
pp. S39-S39
Author(s):  
L. Lamy ◽  
J. Chauny ◽  
D. Ross
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Spine ◽  
Cervical Spine Injury ◽  
Fracture Dislocation ◽  
Spine Injury ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Minor Trauma ◽  
Cervical Injury ◽  
Geriatric Population ◽  
Spinal Immobilisation ◽  
A Minor

Introduction: Following a protocol derived from the Canadian C-spine Rule (CCR), patients 65 years and older transported by ambulance after trauma require full spinal immobilisation. Immobilisation complicates the transport and the evaluation; potential side effects have been recognized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mechanism of trauma and age on the rate of cervical injury in a geriatric population. Methods: We conducted a retrospective observational study on patients 65 years and older transported by ambulance to a level-one trauma center from March 2008 to October 2013. The outcome was the rate of clinically important cervical spine injury (CICSI), defined as any fracture, dislocation or ligamentous injury needing treatment or specialised follow up. The rate was calculated in the geriatric population and in the subgroup of patients with minor trauma, defined as a fall from a standing height, a chair or a bed. We then looked at the rate of CICSI based on age to define a subgroup at lower risk of lesion. Results: We included 1221 patients with a mean age of 80 y.o. (SD = 8), 739 women (61%). CICSI was found in 53 patients (4.3%, 95% CI 3.2-5.4). This is similar to the rate found in patients 65 years and older in the NEXUS population (4.6%) and the CCR population (6.0%). The mechanism of injury was a minor trauma for 716 patients (59%). Of those, 24 patients (3.4%, 95% CI 2.1-4.7) had CICSI. The rate increased after 85 y.o in both the overall population (3.4% vs 6.4%) and the minor trauma subgroup (2.6% vs 4.4%). Conclusion: The subgroup of patients 65-84 y.o. with a minor trauma had the lower rate of cervical spine injury (2.6%). In a lot of prehospital systems, those patients are not systematically immobilised for transport. It will be interesting to review the files of all patients with CICSI to identify any possible case that would have been missed without the age criteria.

scholarly journals (P1-62) The Risk Factors for Difficult or Failed Airway: A Prosepctive Cohor Study

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (S1) ◽  
pp. s118-s118
Author(s):  
C. Hsu
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Airway Management ◽  
Difficult Airway ◽  
Healthcare Providers ◽  
Positive Association ◽  
Daily Practice ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Airway Trauma ◽  
Failed Airway ◽  
Airway Devices

The risk factors for difficult airway or failed airway: a prospective cohort study Airway management is always the first priority and time-treasures in critical ill-patients. Improper managementof difficult airway or resultant fail airway would bring poor prognosis to patients. We investigated the risk factors of difficult or fail airway from the multiple dimension of factors including patients, healthcare and airway devices. We enrolled 252 intubated patients, including 37 trauma patients, 55 patients (22%) with difficult airway, and 22 patients (8.7%) with fail airway. In analysis of risk factors of difficult airway, factors including obesity, short neck or thickness of soft tissue, facial deformities and oral-nasal bleeding have positive association with fail airway, but the seniority of healthcare providers had no effect. However, experienced healthcare providers have more success rate after the occurrence of fail airway. The most complications of fail airway include airway trauma and hypoxia. As compared with non-trauma patients, trauma patients have more episodes of fail airway, difficult airway, and use of RSI, rescue airway for fail airway, airway trauma and vomiting. Therefore, it is necessary to establish an easy and safe standard guideline in daily practice of difficult and urgent airway management for healthcare providers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document