scholarly journals Peritraumatic distress predicts depression in traumatically injured patients admitted to a Level I trauma center

2018 ◽  
Vol 54 ◽  
pp. 57-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brian E. Bunnell ◽  
Tatiana M. Davidson ◽  
Margaret T. Anton ◽  
Bruce A. Crookes ◽  
Kenneth J. Ruggiero
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Level I ◽  
Peritraumatic Distress ◽  
Injured Patients

Analysis of Profit and Loss by Injury Severity over 20 Years at a University Level I Trauma Center

2016 ◽  
Vol 82 (7) ◽  
pp. 644-648
Author(s):  
Zachary Dietch ◽  
Jeffrey S. Young ◽  
Steven D. Young
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Positive Margin ◽  
Cost Data ◽  
Hospital Charges ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Average Loss ◽  
University Level ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

We examined financial data from a University Level I Trauma Center from 1994 to 2014. We sought to investigate the hypothesis that lower injury severity correlates with increased profitability. We examined data from July 1994 to December 2014. This included hospital charges, Medicare cost data, final reimbursement, and payor source. Patients were separated into Injury Severity Score (ISS) groupings: 0 to 9, 10 to 14, 15 to 24, >24, and >14. Mean and standard deviation of mean are reported. We had complete data on 27,582 patients. Overall profit per case when subtracting costs from reimbursements was $1,932/case (total profit in unadjusted dollars = $53,475,828 or $2,673,791/year). When examined by ISS, profitability was significantly different between ISS 0 to 14 and 15 to 24, and > 24. When charge data were examined, the average loss per case was -$31,313 for the 27,582 patient data set. When using cost, and not charge data, overall trauma care had a positive margin. Severely injured patients (ISS > 14) were the most profitable, with a significantly higher profit per case than all other groupings. Only through examination of cost data can realistic determinations of trauma center profitability be made. If only charge data had been examined in this study, the overall loss from the 20-year period would have been $863,675,166 and not a profit of $53,475,828.

Initial Approach to the Management of Multisystem Trauma

2019 ◽  
pp. 397-401
Author(s):  
David S. Morris
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Hospital Admissions ◽  
The United States ◽  
Emergency Department Visits ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Level I ◽  
Nonfatal Injuries ◽  
Injured Patients

Nearly 200,000 people die of injury-related causes in the United States each year, and injury is the leading cause of death for all patients aged 1 to 44 years. Approximately 30 million people sustain nonfatal injuries each year, which results in about 29 million emergency department visits and 3 million hospital admissions. Management of severely injured patients, typically defined as having an Injury Severity Score greater than 15 is best managed in a level I or level II trauma center. Any physician who provides care for critically ill patients should have a basic familiarity with the fundamentals of trauma care.

Resuscitation of Hypotensive Head-Injured Patients: Is Hypertonic Saline the Answer?

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
pp. 253-259
Author(s):  
Jose L. Pascual ◽  
Eileen Maloney-Wilensky ◽  
Patrick M. Reilly ◽  
Corinna Sicoutris ◽  
Michael K. Keutmann ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Tissue ◽  
Hypertonic Saline ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Tissue Oxygenation ◽  
Perfusion Pressure ◽  
Inclusion Criteria ◽  
Brain Tissue Oxygenation ◽  
Head Injured ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

Hypertonic saline (HTS) may decrease intracranial pressure (ICP) in severe traumatic brain injury (STBI) and effectively resuscitates hypotensive patients. No data exist on institutional standardization of HTS for hypotensive patients with STBI. It remains unclear how HTS affects brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) in STBI. We hypothesized HTS could be safely standardized in patients with STBI and would lower ICP while improving cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) and PbtO2. Under institutional guidelines in a Level I trauma center, 12 hypotensive STBI intensive care unit subjects received HTS. Inclusion criteria included mean arterial pressure (MAP) ≤ 90 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) ≤ 8, ICP ≥ 20 mmHg, and serum [Na+] < 155 mEq/L. All patients underwent ICP monitoring. Hemodynamics, CPP, ICP, and PbtO2 data were collected before and hourly for 6 hours after HTS infusion. Guideline criteria compliance was greater than 95 per cent. No major complications occurred. Mean ICP levels dropped by 45 per cent (P < 0.01) and this drop persisted for 6 hours. CPP levels increased by 20 per cent (P < 0.05). PbtO2 remained persistently elevated for all time points after HTS infusion. Institutional use of HTS in STBI can be safely implemented in a center caring for neurotrauma patients. HTS infusion in hypotensive STBI reduces ICP and raises CPP. Brain tissue oxygenation tends to improve after HTS infusion.

Blood Transfusions in Trauma: Six-Year Analysis of the Transfusion Practices at a Level I Trauma Center

2008 ◽  
Vol 74 (10) ◽  
pp. 953-957 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pedro G.R. Teixeira ◽  
Didem Oncel ◽  
Demetrios Demetriades ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Ira Shulman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Negative Impact ◽  
Fresh Frozen Plasma ◽  
Blood Transfusions ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Packed Red Blood Cells ◽  
Fresh Frozen ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

The objective of this study was to analyze the transfusion practices in trauma patients in one institution. A retrospective analysis of the Trauma Registry linked with the Blood Bank Database of a Level 1 trauma center was conducted. Over 6 years, 17 per cent of the 25,599 trauma patients received blood transfusions. The overall mortality in transfused patients was 20 per cent and remained the same during the study period. There was no change in the proportion of patients receiving transfusions throughout the years, however there was a significant 23.5 per cent reduction in the mean number of packed red blood cells (PRBC) units transfused (P < 0.001 for trend). This reduction in PRBC used remained true and even more evident in the group of more severely injured patients (Injury Severity Score ≥ 16), with a 27.9 per cent decrease in mean units of PRBC (P < 0.001 for trend). The highest reduction in PRBC transfusion was seen in blunt trauma patients (34.6%, P < 0.001). During the study period there was a concurrent increase in mean units of fresh frozen plasma used (60.7%, P < 0.001) and no change in the use of platelets and cryoprecipitate. In conclusion, transfusions of PRBC were significantly reduced over time in trauma patients without any evident negative impact on mortality.

scholarly journals Age and traumatic brain injury as prognostic factors for late-phase mortality in patients defined as polytrauma according to the New Berlin Definition: experiences from a level I trauma center

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
V. Weihs ◽  
V. Heel ◽  
M. Dedeyan ◽  
N. W. Lang ◽  
S. Frenzel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Late Phase ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Severely Injured Patients ◽  
Berlin Definition ◽  
Severe Tbi ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

Abstract Background The rationale of this study was to identify independent prognostic factors influencing the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients defined according to the New Berlin Definition. Methods Retrospective data analysis on 173 consecutively polytraumatized patients treated at a level I trauma center between January 2012 and December 2015. Patients were classified into two groups: severely injured patients (ISS > 16) and polytraumatized patients (patients who met the diagnostic criteria for the New Berlin Definition). Results Polytraumatized patients showed significantly lower late-phase and overall survival rates. The presence of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and age > 55 years had a significant influence on the late-phase survival in polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients. Despite the percentage of severe TBI being nearly identical in both groups, severe TBI was identified as main cause of death in polytraumatized patients. Furthermore, severe TBI remains the main cause of death in polytraumatized patients > 55 years of age, whereas younger polytraumatized patients (< 55 years of age) tend to die more often due to the acute trauma. Conclusion Our results suggest that age beyond 55 years and concomitant (severe) TBI remain as most important influencing risk factor for the late-phase survival of polytraumatized patients but not in severely injured patients. Level of evidence Prognostic study, level III.

The prevalence and impact of prescription controlled substance use among injured patients at a Level I trauma center

2014 ◽  
Vol 76 (1) ◽  
pp. 172-175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Cannon ◽  
Matthew Bozeman ◽  
Keith Roy Miller ◽  
Jason Wayne Smith ◽  
Brian Harbrecht ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Substance Use ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Controlled Substance ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients

A Contemporary Analysis of the Effect of Trauma Center Verification Level on Mortality in Severe Injury

2021 ◽  
pp. 000313482110234
Author(s):  
David S. Plurad ◽  
Glenn Geesman ◽  
Nicholas W. Sheets ◽  
Bhani Chawla-Kondal ◽  
Napatakamon Ayutyanont ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Trauma Center ◽  
Injury Severity ◽  
Severely Injured ◽  
Adult Age ◽  
Program Participant ◽  
Level Ii ◽  
Level I ◽  
Verification Process ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
The Impact

Background Literature demonstrates increased mortality for the severely injured at a Level II vs. Level I center. Our objective is to reevaluate the impact of trauma center verification level on mortality for patients with an Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15 utilizing more contemporary data. We hypothesize that there would be no mortality discrepancy. Study Design Utilizing the ACS Trauma Quality Program Participant Use File admission year 2017, we identified severely injured (ISS >15) adult (age >15 years) patients treated at an ACS-verified Level I or Level II center. We excluded patients who underwent interfacility transfer. Logistic regression was performed to determine adjusted associations with mortality. Results There were 63 518 patients included, where 43 680 (68.8%) were treated at a Level I center and 19 838 (31.2%) at a Level II. Male gender (70.1%) and blunt injuries (92.0%) predominated. Level I admissions had a higher mean ISS [23.8 (±8.5) vs. 22.9 (±7.8), <.001], while Level II patients were older [mean age (y) 52.3 (±21.6) vs. 48.6 (±21.0), <.001] with multiple comorbidities (37.7% vs. 34.9%, <.001). Adjusted mortality between Level I and II centers was similar (12.0% vs. 11.8%, .570). Conclusions Despite previous findings, mortality outcomes are similar for severely injured patients treated at a Level I vs. Level II center. We theorize that this relates to mandated Level II resourcing as defined by an updated American College of Surgeons verification process.

The Impact of Early Hormonal Therapy in Catastrophic Brain-Injured Patients and Its Effect on Organ Procurement

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (3) ◽  
pp. 318-324 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lydia Lam ◽  
Kenji Inaba ◽  
Bernardino Castelo Branco ◽  
Bradley Putty ◽  
Ali Salim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Hormonal Therapy ◽  
Trauma Center ◽  
Organ Procurement ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Academic Level ◽  
Brain Injured ◽  
Early Use ◽  
Level I ◽  
Injured Patients ◽  
The Impact

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of early hormonal therapy on organ procurement from catastrophic brain-injured patients. All catastrophic brain-injured patients admitted to a high-volume academic Level I trauma center who underwent successful organ procurement over a 3-year period (2006 to 2008) were reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups, those who received hormone therapy (HT) before brain death (BD) declaration and those who received HT after BD declaration. Thirty-two (60.4%) received HT before BD and 21 (39.6%) HTafter BD. Trauma was the most common cause of brain injury in both groups (before BD 96.9 vs after BD 90.5%, P = 0.324). There were no significant differences in demographics and clinical data. Patients receiving HT before BD were more hypotensive on admission (28.2 vs 9.5%, P = 0.048); however, they required vasopressors less frequently (62.5 vs 100.0%, P = 0.001), for a shorter duration (17.2 ± 16.3 hours vs 33.1 ± 34.9 hours, P = 0.043), and at a lower dosage. Time from admission to procurement did not differ between the two groups (109.8 ± 83.1 hours vs 125.0 ± 79.9 hours, P = 0.505). Patients receiving HT before BD had significantly more organs procured (4.5 ± 1.5 vs 3.5 ± 1.3, P = 0.023). Although catastrophic brain-injured patients receiving early hormonal therapy were more hypotensive, they required less vasopressors and had higher procurement rates. The early use of hormonal therapy may decrease the need for vasopressors and increase the salvage of potentially transplantable organs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document