scholarly journals Invasive earthworms affect soil morphological features and carbon stocks in boreal forests

Geoderma ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 404 ◽  
pp. 115262
Author(s):  
Justine Lejoly ◽  
Sylvie Quideau ◽  
Jérôme Laganière
2021 ◽  
Vol 97 (02) ◽  
pp. 168-178
Author(s):  
Michael T. Ter-Mikaelian ◽  
Stephen J. Colombo ◽  
Jiaxin Chen

We used models to project forest carbon stocks for a series of harvesting scenarios for 29 boreal forest management units totalling 23.3 million ha in Ontario, Canada. Scenarios evaluated for 2020 to 2050 ranged from a no harvesting option to annual harvesting of 2% of the total merchantable volume present in 2020. For each scenario, we estimated the following carbon quantities: (a) forest ecosystem carbon stocks, (b) sum of carbon stocks in forest ecosystem and harvested wood products (HWP) minus emissions associated with HWP production and decomposition, and (c) net greenhouse gas (GHG) effects of harvesting estimated as (b) combined with emissions avoided by substituting HWP for non-wood materials. The average of each carbon quantity for 2020 to 2050 was linearly dependent on the annual harvest volume. The developed relationships were used to estimate harvest volumes for which the three carbon quantities would equal equilibrium forest ecosystem carbon stocks for a pre-suppression natural disturbance cycle. These estimates indicate the range of harvest volumes for which resulting carbon stocks would equal or exceed those in an unmanaged forest. Also discussed are possible criteria for determining annual harvest volume.


2013 ◽  
Vol 309 ◽  
pp. 4-18 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lars Vesterdal ◽  
Nicholas Clarke ◽  
Bjarni D. Sigurdsson ◽  
Per Gundersen

2018 ◽  
Vol 75 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chao Huang ◽  
Hong S. He ◽  
Yu Liang ◽  
Zhiwei Wu ◽  
Todd J. Hawbaker ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anu Akujärvi ◽  
Anna Repo ◽  
Altti M. Akujärvi ◽  
Jari Liski

Abstract Background Increasing the use of forest harvest residues for bioenergy production reduces greenhouse emissions from the use of fossil fuels. However, it may also reduce carbon stocks and habitats for deadwood dependent species. Consequently, simple tools for assessing the trade-offs of alternative management practices on forest dynamics and their services to people are needed. The objectives of this study were to combine mapping and simulation modelling to investigate the effects of forest management on ecosystem services related to carbon cycle in the case of bioenergy production; and to evaluate the suitability of this approach for assessing ecosystem services at the landscape level. Stand level simulations of forest growth and carbon budget were combined with extensive multi-source forest inventory data across a southern boreal landscape in Finland. Stochastic changes in the stand age class distribution over the study region were simulated to mimic variation in management regimes. Results The mapping framework produced reasonable estimates of the effects of forest management on a set of key ecosystem service indicators: the annual carbon stocks and fluxes of forest biomass and soil, timber and energy-wood production and the coarse woody litter production over a simulation period 2012–2100. Regular harvesting, affecting the stand age class distribution, was a key driver of the carbon stock changes at a landscape level. Extracting forest harvest residues in the final felling caused carbon loss from litter and soil, particularly with combined aboveground residue and stump harvesting. It also reduced the annual coarse woody litter production, demonstrating negative impacts on deadwood abundance and, consequently, forest biodiversity. Conclusions The refined mapping framework was suitable for assessing ecosystem services at the landscape level. The procedure contributes to bridging the gap between ecosystem service mapping and detailed simulation modelling in boreal forests. It allows for visualizing ecosystem services as fine resolution maps to support sustainable land use planning. In the future, more detailed models and a wider variety of ecosystem service indicators could be added to develop the method.


Ecosystems ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 851-863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Meelis Seedre ◽  
Anthony R. Taylor ◽  
Brian W. Brassard ◽  
Han Y. H. Chen ◽  
Kalev Jõgiste

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (8) ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Palviainen ◽  
A. Laurén ◽  
J. Pumpanen ◽  
Y. Bergeron ◽  
B. Bond‐Lamberty ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 468 ◽  
pp. 118169 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wataru Hotta ◽  
Junko Morimoto ◽  
Takahiro Inoue ◽  
Satoshi N. Suzuki ◽  
Toshihiro Umebayashi ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-11
Author(s):  
Michael T. Ter-Mikaelian ◽  
Stephen J. Colombo ◽  
Jiaxin Chen

We used models to project forest carbon stocks for a series of harvesting scenarios for 29 boreal forest management units totalling 23.3 million ha in Ontario, Canada. Scenarios evaluated for 2020 to 2050 ranged from a no harvesting option to annual harvesting of 2% of the total merchantable volume present in 2020. For each scenario, we estimated the following carbon quantities: (a) forest ecosystem carbon stocks, (b) sum of carbon stocks in forest ecosystem and harvested wood products (HWP) minus emissions associated with HWP production and decomposition, and (c) net greenhouse gas (GHG) effects of harvesting estimated as (b) combined with emissions avoided by substituting HWP for non-wood materials. The average of each carbon quantity for 2020 to 2050 was linearly dependent on the annual harvest volume. The developed relationships were used to estimate harvest volumes for which the three carbon quantities would equal equilibrium forest ecosystem carbon stocks for a pre-suppression natural disturbance cycle. These estimates indicate the range of harvest volumes for which resulting carbon stocks would equal or exceed those in an unmanaged forest. Also discussed are possible criteria for determining annual harvest volume.


2004 ◽  
pp. 235-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frauz Conen ◽  
Argyro Zerva ◽  
Dominique Arrouays ◽  
Claude Jolivet ◽  
Paul G. Jarvis ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clement J. Delcourt ◽  
Brian Izbicki ◽  
Elena A. Kukavskaya ◽  
Michelle C. Mack ◽  
Trofim C. Maximov ◽  
...  

<p>The boreal forest is one of the largest terrestrial carbon reservoirs on Earth and accounts for approximately 30% of the world’s forest cover. The boreal carbon balance is thus of global significance. Wildfires affect the boreal carbon balance, releasing large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere when soil organic layers and aboveground biomass are combusted. The boreal forest is warming faster than the global average. These higher temperatures lead to increases in the frequency and severity of wildfire disturbance in boreal regions.</p><p>Significant progress has been made in quantifying carbon combustion in North American boreal forests, yet few measurements have been conducted in the larch dominated boreal forests of Northeast Siberia. Deciduous needleleaf larch forest growing on continuous permafrost is a unique ecosystem of Siberia. Although these larch forests cover approximately 20% of the boreal biome, the consequences of intensifying fire regimes on the carbon stocks and vegetation dynamics of these ecosystems remain poorly understood.</p><p>We conducted a field campaign in larch forests around Yakutsk, Northeast Siberia, during the summer of 2019 with the goal of filling parts of these knowledge and data gaps by collecting ground measurements of carbon combustion from two large fire events in 2017 and 2018. During this campaign, we sampled 42 burned sites in two fire scars that cover gradients of fire severity, vegetation composition and landscape position. Within these sites, we performed a wide range of measurements to quantify aboveground and belowground carbon emissions, constrained by data from 12 unburned sites. We also assessed post-fire recovery and active layer deepening. We investigated major drivers of pre-fire carbon stocks and subsequent combustion at the site level. Our results will reduce uncertainties in larger scale estimates of carbon emissions from Siberian fires which is in turn essential for assessing the implications of the climate-induced intensification of fire regimes for the global carbon cycle.</p>


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document