The human role in changing fluvial systems: Retrospect, inventory and prospect

Geomorphology ◽  
2006 ◽  
Vol 79 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 152-171 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Allan James ◽  
W. Andrew Marcus
Keyword(s):  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Anne Tisherman ◽  
◽  
Daniel J. Bain
Keyword(s):  

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathan A. Niemi ◽  
◽  
Adda Athanasopoulos-Zekkos ◽  
Cassandra Champagne ◽  
Marin K. Clark ◽  
...  

Water ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (11) ◽  
pp. 1608
Author(s):  
Salvatore Ivo Giano

This Special Issue deals with the role of fluvial geomorphology in landscape evolution and the impact of human activities on fluvial systems, which require river restoration and management [...]


Author(s):  
Laura Barral-Fraga ◽  
María Teresa Barral ◽  
Keeley L. MacNeill ◽  
Diego Martiñá-Prieto ◽  
Soizic Morin ◽  
...  

This review is focused on the biogeochemistry of arsenic in freshwaters and, especially, on the key role that benthic microalgae and prokaryotic communities from biofilms play together in through speciation, distribution, and cycling. These microorganisms incorporate the dominant iAs (inorganic arsenic) form and may transform it to other arsenic forms through metabolic or detoxifying processes. These transformations have a big impact on the environmental behavior of arsenic because different chemical forms exhibit differences in mobility and toxicity. Moreover, exposure to toxicants may alter the physiology and structure of biofilms, leading to changes in ecosystem function and trophic relations. In this review we also explain how microorganisms (i.e., biofilms) can influence the effects of arsenic exposure on other key constituents of aquatic ecosystems such as fish. At the end, we present two real cases of fluvial systems with different origins of arsenic exposure (natural vs. anthropogenic) that have improved our comprehension of arsenic biogeochemistry and toxicity in freshwaters, the Pampean streams (Argentina) and the Anllóns River (Galicia, Spain). We finish with a briefly discussion of what we consider as future research needs on this topic. This work especially contributes to the general understanding of biofilms influencing arsenic biogeochemistry and highlights the strong impact of nutrient availability on arsenic toxicity for freshwater (micro) organisms.


1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 500-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
A.P. Nicholas ◽  
P.J. Ashworth ◽  
M.J. Kirkby ◽  
M.G. Macklin ◽  
T. Murray

Variations in fluvial sediment transport rates and storage volumes have been described previously as sediment waves or pulses. These features have been identified over a wide range of temporal and spatial scales and have been categorized using existing bedform classifications. Here we describe the factors controlling the generation and propagation of what we term sediment slugs. These can be defined as bodies of clastic material associated with disequilibrium conditions in fluvial systems over time periods above the event scale. Slugs range in magnitude from unit bars (Smith, 1974) up to sedimentary features generated by basin-scale sediment supply disturbances (Trimble, 1981). At lower slug magnitudes, perturbations in sediment transport are generated by local riverbank and/or bed erosion. Larger-scale features result from the occurrence of rare high- magnitude geomorphic events, and the impacts on water and sediment production of tectonics, glaciation, climate change and anthropogenic influences. Simple sediment routing functions are presented which may be used to describe the propagation of sediment slugs in fluvial systems. Attention is drawn to components of the fluvial system where future research is urgently required to improve our quantitative understanding of drainage-basin sediment dynamics.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document