Deep learning-based approach for landform classification from integrated data sources of digital elevation model and imagery

Geomorphology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 354 ◽  
pp. 107045 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sijin Li ◽  
Liyang Xiong ◽  
Guoan Tang ◽  
Josef Strobl
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sijin Li ◽  
Liyang Xiong ◽  
Guoan Tang ◽  
Josef Strobl

<p>Landform classification is one of the most important aspects in geomorphological research, dividing the Earth’s surface into diverse geomorphological types. Thus, an accurate classification of landforms is a key procedure in describing the topographic characteristics of a given area and understanding their inner geomorphological formation processes. However, landform types are not always independent of one another due to the complexity and dynamics of interior and external forces. Furthermore, transitional landforms with gradually changing surface morphologies are widely distributed on the Earth’s surface. With this situation, classifying these complex and transitional landforms with traditional landform classification methods is hard. In this study, a deep learning (DL) algorithm was introduced, aiming at automatically classifying complex and transitional landforms. This algorithm was trained to learn and extract landform features from integrated data sources. These integrated data sources contain different combinations of imagery, digital elevation models (DEMs), and terrain derivatives. The Loess Plateau in China, which contains complex and transitional loess landforms, was selected as the study area for data training. In addition, two sample areas in the Loess Plateau with complex and transitional loess hill and ridge landforms were used to validate the classified landform types by using the proposed DL method. Meanwhile, a comparative analysis between the proposed DL and random forest (RF) methods was also conducted to investigate their capabilities in landform classification. The proposed DL approach can achieve the highest landform classification accuracy of 87% in the transitional area with data combination of DEMs and images. In addition, the proposed DL method can achieve a higher accuracy of landform classification with better defined landform boundaries compared to the RF method. The classified loess landforms indicate the different landform development stages in this area. Finally, the proposed DL method can be extended to other landform areas for classifying their complex and transitional landforms.</p>


Geomorphology ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 100 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 453-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hossein Saadat ◽  
Robert Bonnell ◽  
Forood Sharifi ◽  
Guy Mehuys ◽  
Mohammad Namdar ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 255-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Tran ◽  
V. Raghavan ◽  
S. Masumoto ◽  
P. Vinayaraj ◽  
G. Yonezawa

Abstract. Global Digital Elevation Model (DEM) is considered as vital spatial information and finds wide use in several applications. Advanced Spaceborne Thermal Emission and Reflection Radiometer (ASTER) Global DEM (GDEM) and Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) DEM offer almost global coverage and provide elevation data for geospatial analysis. However, GDEM and SRTM still contain some height errors that affect the quality of elevation data significantly. This study aims to examine methods to improve the resolution as well as accuracy of available free DEMs by data fusion technique and evaluating the results with high quality reference DEM. The DEM fusion method is based on the accuracy assessment of each global DEM and geomorphological characteristics of the study area. Land cover units were also considered to correct the elevation of GDEM and SRTM with respect to the bare earth surface. Weighted averaging method was used to fuse the input DEMs based on landform classification map. According to the landform types, the different weights were used for GDEM and SRTM. Finally, a denoising algorithm (Sun et al., 2007) was applied to filter the output fused DEM. This fused DEM shows excellent correlation to the reference DEM having correlation coefficient R2 = 0.9986 and the accuracy was also improved from Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) 14.9 m in GDEM and 14.8 m in SRTM into 11.6 m in fused DEM.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document