Timing of river capture in major Yangtze River tributaries: Insights from sediment provenance and morphometric indices

Geomorphology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 107915
Author(s):  
Niannian Fan ◽  
Ping Kong ◽  
Jörg Christian Robl ◽  
Hongwei Zhou ◽  
Xianyan Wang ◽  
...  
2010 ◽  
Vol 295 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 379-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Long Van Hoang ◽  
Peter D. Clift ◽  
Darren Mark ◽  
Hongbo Zheng ◽  
Mai Thanh Tan

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (4) ◽  
pp. 636-649 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xilin Sun ◽  
Chang'an Li ◽  
Klaudia F. Kuiper ◽  
Jietao Wang ◽  
Yuntao Tian ◽  
...  

Minerals ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (7) ◽  
pp. 643
Author(s):  
Xilin Sun ◽  
Klaudia F. Kuiper ◽  
Yuntao Tian ◽  
Chang’an Li ◽  
Zengjie Zhang ◽  
...  

Detrital zircon U-Pb and muscovite 40Ar/39Ar dating are useful tools for investigating sediment provenance and regional tectonic histories. However, the two types of data from same sample do not necessarily give consistent results. Here, we compare published detrital muscovite 40Ar/39Ar and zircon U-Pb ages of modern sands from the Yangtze River to reveal potential factors controlling differences in their provenance age signals. Detrital muscovite 40Ar/39Ar ages of the major tributaries and main trunk suggest that the Dadu River is a dominant sediment contributor to the lower Yangtze. However, detrital zircon data suggest that the Yalong, Dadu, and Min rivers are the most important sediment suppliers. This difference could be caused by combined effects of lower reaches dilution, laser spot location on zircons and difference in closure temperature and durability between muscovite and zircon. The bias caused by sediment laser spot targeting a core or rim of zircon and zircon reworking should be considered in provenance studies.


1995 ◽  
Vol 19 (4) ◽  
pp. 449-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paul Bishop

Drainage rearrangement, involving stream piracy (capture), drainage diversion and/or beheading, may be significant for sediment budgets (including sediment provenance) and biotic distributions, as well as for its more usually considered role in landscape evolution. The processes involved in drainage rearrangement are not as self-evident as its abundant literature indicates. This is especially the case with the commonly invoked stream capture. The key process in stream capture, namely, drainage head retreat, is difficult to envisage as a normal part of drainage net evolution, especially in the light of recent findings on drainage hollow evolution. Stream capture may therefore be a relatively rare event in drainage net evolution. This, and uncertainties with interpretations of supposed elbows of capture, mean that stream capture should not be routinely invoked in interpretations of long-term drainage evolution. Further uncertainties associated with the maintenance of drainage lines during the erosion of significant crustal sections, especially in faulted and folded terrains, diminish the likelihood of many supposed examples of stream capture. It is more likely that examples of drainage rearrangement attributed to stream capture were generated by drainage diversion, but even this may involve special conditions.


Minerals ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (10) ◽  
pp. 1056
Author(s):  
Chunguo Kang ◽  
Chang’an Li ◽  
Chuanyi Wei ◽  
Yufen Zhang ◽  
Huajun Jiang ◽  
...  

The Three Gorges valley is one of the two key capture points of the evolution of the Yangtze River, yet the formation of this valley—from the pre-Miocene to the late Pleistocene—remains uncertain. The Jianghan Basin, a late Mesozoic–Cenozoic basin located just downstream of the Three Gorges valley, is a crucial area for understanding the formation of the valley. In this study, we used heavy mineral assemblages to trace the provenance of Pliocene–Pleistocene sediments obtained from the 300-m-depth Zhoulao drillcore in the Jianghan Basin. Results show that heavy mineral concentrations, compositions, and species display a clear change at a depth of 110 m in the studied core, consistent with the change in values of magnetic indexes and trace-element geochemical indicators. The heavy mineral assemblage deposited below a depth of 110 m (lower section of the core) comprises zircon, epidote, leucoxene, rutile, anatase, pyrite, and titanite, whereas that deposited above 110 m (upper section) consists of hornblende, pyroxene, garnet, hematite-limonite, and magnetite. In addition, the heavy mineral assemblage of the upper section is similar to that of the modern surface fluvial sediments of the Yangtze, which indicates that materials of the upper core section of the Jianghan Basin were sourced from the upper Yangtze River Basin, west of the Three Gorges. After incision of the Three Gorges valley, sediments from the upper Yangtze were transported to the Jianghan Basin and deposited. Combining the results of this study with the known paleomagnetic chronology of the Jianghan Basin, we propose that the Three Gorges valley was incised at ca. 1.1 Ma.


2014 ◽  
Vol 15 (7) ◽  
pp. 2765-2779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zengjie Zhang ◽  
Shane Tyrrell ◽  
Chang'an Li ◽  
J. Stephen Daly ◽  
Xilin Sun ◽  
...  

2004 ◽  
Vol 88 (8) ◽  
pp. 59-64
Author(s):  
Changyu Shao ◽  
Qinger Deng

2012 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 1850-1857
Author(s):  
Lijia Song ◽  
Zhen Zhang ◽  
Rujin Ma ◽  
Airong Chen

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document