Mo1364 EUS-Guided Fiducial Placement for Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (5) ◽  
pp. AB409-AB410
Author(s):  
Wang Lei ◽  
Zheng-Dong Jin ◽  
Zhaoshen LI
Pancreatology ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 19 ◽  
pp. S184
Author(s):  
J. Zafra Martín ◽  
R. Rodríguez ◽  
R. Chicas Sett ◽  
J. Castilla Martínez ◽  
J. Blanco ◽  
...  

2016 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 295-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiziana Comito ◽  
L. Cozzi ◽  
E. Clerici ◽  
C. Franzese ◽  
A. Tozzi ◽  
...  

Purpose: To assess the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Materials and Methods: All patients received a prescription dose of 45 Gy in 6 fractions. Primary end point was freedom from local progression. Secondary end points were overall survival, progression-free survival, and toxicity. Actuarial survival analysis and univariate or multivariate analysis were investigated. Results: Forty-five patients were enrolled in a phase 2 trial. Median follow-up was 13.5 months. Freedom from local progression was 90% at 2 years. On univariate ( P < .03) and multivariate analyses ( P < .001), lesion size was statistically significant for freedom from local progression. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 8 and 13 months, respectively. On multivariate analysis, tumor size ( P < .001) and freedom from local progression ( P < .002) were significantly correlated with overall survival. Thirty-two (71%) patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer received chemotherapy before stereotactic body radiotherapy. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 19 months. Multivariate analysis showed that freedom from local progression ( P < .035), tumor diameter ( P < .002), and computed tomography before stereotactic body radiotherapy ( P < .001) were significantly correlated with overall survival from diagnosis. Conclusion: Stereotactic body radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer with no G3 toxicity or greater and could be a promising therapeutic option in multimodality treatment regimen.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
pp. 107-108
Author(s):  
J Quinlan ◽  
J Pantarotto ◽  
K Dennis ◽  
A Chatterjee

Abstract Background Pancreatic cancer is the 4th deadliest cancer in Canada, with an overall 5-year survival of only 6%. Every year, approximately 4000 Canadians are diagnosed with pancreatic cancer, and only 10–15% of these patients have surgically resectable disease. No satisfactory treatment exists for patients with inoperable locally advanced pancreatic carcinoma. The best survival has been achieved using a combination of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Conventional radiotherapy has inadequate local disease control as the therapeutic radiation dose to the tumour is limited by the sensitivities of surrounding tissues. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) is a minimally invasive treatment technique that allows for ultra-high doses of radiation to be delivered to small areas. The CyberKnife® Robotic Radiosurgery System is a radiation unit designed to deliver SBRT. Fiducial markers placed by endoscopic ultrasound help direct the radiotherapy. It is hypothesized that a higher overall dose of radiation will result in higher rates of local control, and potentially improved survival. Aims The goal of this study is to establish the safety and feasibility of using stereotactic body radiotherapy boost technique via CyberKnife in treating unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer, as well as to determine the maximal tolerable radiation dose (MTD) of the SBRT boost that can be safely delivered. Methods This is a prospective single-arm, single-institution phase I Time-to-event Continual Reassessment Methodology (TITE-CRM) radiation dose escalation trial. This study enrolled patients aged 18–84 with pathologically confirmed pancreatic cancer who were determined to have surgically unresectable disease, with an ECOG ≤2. These patients were treated with SBRT prior to starting conventional radiotherapy, which consisted of a total dose of 45 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. Results Between 2012 and 2018, a total of 11 patients met the eligibility criteria of this study. Their ages ranged from 61 to 84 with a mean of 71.5 years, and they were 64% (7/11) male. At the time of this analysis, 10 of the 11 patients had passed away. The mean and median survival times were 413 days and 313 days, respectively. Three of the patients had significant complications attributed to the radiotherapy, 2 gastric outlet obstructions and 1 deep duodenal ulcer. The doses used ranged from 21 Gy in 3 fractions to 50 Gy in 5 fractions. Conclusions This phase 1, single arm study demonstrates that stereotactic body radiotherapy in the treatment of locally advanced, unresectable pancreatic cancer is technically feasible. When combined with conventional radiotherapy, this therapy is generally well tolerated, and can effectively deliver higher doses of radiation to pancreatic malignancies. Doses up to 50 Gy in 5 fractions were tolerated, with the most common dose being 21 Gy in 3 fractions. Funding Agencies National Pancreatic Cancer Canada Foundation


Author(s):  
Anand Mahadevan ◽  
Sanjay Jain ◽  
Michael Goldstein ◽  
Rebecca Miksad ◽  
Douglas Pleskow ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 18 ◽  
pp. 153303381985152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shuo Wang ◽  
Dandan Zheng ◽  
Chi Lin ◽  
Yu Lei ◽  
Vivek Verma ◽  
...  

Background: Stereotactic body radiotherapy has been suggested to provide high rates of local control for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. However, the close proximity of highly radiosensitive normal tissues usually causes the labor-intensive planning process and may impede further escalation of the prescription dose. Purpose: The present study aims to evaluate the consistency and efficiency of Pinnacle Auto-Planning for pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy with original prescription and escalated prescription. Methods: Twenty-four patients with pancreatic cancer treated with stereotactic body radiotherapy were studied retrospectively. The prescription is 40 Gy over 5 consecutive fractions. Most of patients (n = 21) also had 3 other different dose-level targets (6 Gy/fraction, 5 Gy/fraction, and 4 Gy/fraction). Two types of plans were generated by Pinnacle Auto-Planning with the original prescription (8 Gy/fraction, 6 Gy/fraction, 5 Gy/fraction, and 4 Gy/fraction) and escalated prescription (9 Gy/fraction, 7 Gy/fraction, 6 Gy/fraction, and 5 Gy/fraction), respectively. The same Auto-Planning template, including beam geometry, intensity-modulated radiotherapy objectives and intensity-modulated radiotherapy optimization parameters, were utilized for all the auto-plans in each prescription group. The intensity-modulated radiotherapy objectives do not include any manually created structures. Dosimetric parameters including percentage volume of PTV receiving 100% of the prescription dose, percentage volume of PTV receiving 93% of the prescription dose, and consistency of the dose-volume histograms of the target volumes were assessed. Dmax and D1 cc of highly radiosensitive organs were also evaluated. Results: For all the pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy plans with the original or escalated prescriptions, auto-plans met institutional dose constraints for critical organs, such as the duodenum, small intestine, and stomach. Furthermore, auto-plans resulted in acceptable planning target volume coverage for all targets with different prescription levels. All the plans were generated in a one-attempt manner, and very little human intervention is necessary to achieve such plan quality. Conclusions: Pinnacle3 Auto-Planning consistently and efficiently generate acceptable treatment plans for multitarget pancreas stereotactic body radiotherapy with or without dose escalation and may play a more important role in treatment planning in the future.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document