Gastric residual volume after split-dose compared with evening-before polyethylene glycol bowel preparation

2016 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. 574-580 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Agrawal ◽  
Benjamin Elsbernd ◽  
Amit G. Singal ◽  
Don Rockey
2017 ◽  
Vol 2017 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Shi-gui Xue ◽  
Han-lin Chen ◽  
Chun-sheng Cheng ◽  
Bao-sheng Huang ◽  
Hou-de Zhang

The aim of this study was to compare gastric residual volume (GRV) in patients given a split-dose versus a conventional single-dose of polyethylene glycol (PEG) preparation before undergoing anesthetic colonoscopy. Methods. In a prospective observational study, we assessed GRV in outpatients undergoing same-day anesthetic gastroscopy and colonoscopy between October 8 and December 30 of 2016. Outpatients were assigned to the split-dose (1 L PEG in the prior evening and 1 L PEG 2–4 h before endoscopy) or single-dose (ingestion of 2 L PEG ≥ 6 h before endoscopy) regimen randomly. Bowel cleansing quality was assessed with the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results. The median GRV in the split-dose group (17 ml, with a range of 0–50 ml; N=65) was significantly lower than that in the single-dose group (22 ml, with a range of 0–62 ml; N=64; p=0.005), with a better bowel cleansing quality (BBPS score 8.05±0.82 versus 7.64±1.21; p=0.028). GRV was not associated with diabetes or the use of medications. Conclusions. GRV after a split-dose preparation and fasting for 2–4 hours is not larger than that after a conventional single-dose preparation and fasting for 6–8 hours. The data indicates that the split-dose bowel preparation might not increase the risk of aspiration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 85 (5) ◽  
pp. AB174-AB175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Danny J. Avalos ◽  
Majd Michael ◽  
Fernando Castro-Pavia ◽  
Daniel Sussman ◽  
Jose L. Gonzalez Martinez ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB149-AB150 ◽  
Author(s):  
Deepak Agrawal ◽  
Richard Robbins ◽  
Don C. Rockey

2021 ◽  
Vol 104 (10) ◽  
pp. 1597-1603

Background: Colonoscopy is an effective surveillance for the diagnosis and screening of colorectal cancer (CRC). Prior to the procedure, people would take laxatives for a good visualization of bowel texture. Although a split-dose bowel preparation has become popular, many anesthesiologists are concerned about pulmonary aspiration. Objective: To study the gastric residual volume and pH in patients taking split-dose bowel preparation as compared to those having laxatives on the day before the procedure. Materials and Methods: One hundred patients were randomized equally into two groups, as A for a single-dose, and B for a split-dose regimen. All patients underwent endoscopy under standard anesthetic care. The total gastric residual volume was suctioned, and pH was measured through the endoscope. The surgical team was unaware of the study protocol. The quality of bowel cleansing was assessed by the endoscopist using the Boston Bowel Preparation Scale (BBPS). Results: The bowel cleansing, the latency period, the endoscopist and patients’ satisfaction of single-and split-dose group were 7.06±1.4 and 8.14±1.1, 13.3±1.1 and 4.2±0.4 hours, 62.0% and 94.0%, and 90.0% and 74.0%, respectively. They all showed statistically significant differences between the two groups (p<0.05). Conclusion: The gastric residual volume and pH were not different between the split and single-dose preparations. Therefore, it might not increase the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. However, the split-dose technique was more effective in colon cleansing, patients’ tolerability, acceptability, and compliance than the preparations administered entirely the day or evening before the surgical procedure. Keywords: Gastro-colonoscopy; Single-dose bowel preparation; Split-dose bowel preparation; Gastric residual volume; Anesthesia


2010 ◽  
Vol 71 (5) ◽  
pp. AB147
Author(s):  
Todd W. Kilgore ◽  
Nicholas M. Szary ◽  
Abhishek Choudhary ◽  
Michelle L. Matteson ◽  
John B. Marshall ◽  
...  

Digestion ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 86 (3) ◽  
pp. 194-200 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyoung Jun Kim ◽  
Tae Oh Kim ◽  
Bong Chul Shin ◽  
Jae Gon Woo ◽  
Eun Hee Seo ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (5) ◽  
pp. 3028-3037
Author(s):  
Jinjin Cao ◽  
Weiying Zhang ◽  
Jiajie Hu ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Li Zhao ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document