scholarly journals Mo1364 CAN INTRATUMORAL VASCULAR ENHANCEMENT ON THE CONTRAST-ENHANCED ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY PREDICTS RESPONSE OF CHEMOTHERAPY IN UNRESECTABLE ADVANCED PANCREATIC CANCER?

2018 ◽  
Vol 87 (6) ◽  
pp. AB464
Author(s):  
Kyu Choi ◽  
Jeongmin Lee ◽  
Jae Keun Park ◽  
Joo Kyung Park ◽  
Kwang Hyuck Lee ◽  
...  
Diagnostics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kensuke Tanioka ◽  
Yuki Kawaji ◽  
Takashi Tamura ◽  
Junya Nuta ◽  
...  

This study aimed to assess whether contrast-enhanced harmonic endoscopic ultrasonography (CH-EUS), compared to multidetector-row computed tomography (MDCT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), is useful for early diagnosis of small pancreatic cancer (PC). Between March 2010 and June 2018, all three imaging modalities and surgery were performed for patients with a pancreatic solid lesion measuring ≤20 mm; diagnostic ability was compared among modalities. Fifty-one of 60 patients were diagnosed with PC (PC size in 41 patients: 11–20 mm; 10 patients: ≤10 mm). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (11–20 mm) detection were 95%/83%/94%, 78%/83%/79%, and 73%/33%/68%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS was significantly superior compared with MDCT and MRI (p = 0.002 and p = 0.007, respectively). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of CH-EUS, MDCT, and MRI for PC (≤10 mm) detection were 70%/100%/77%, 20%/100%/38%, and 50%/100%/62%, respectively. The diagnostic ability of CH-EUS tended to be superior to that of MDCT (p = 0.025). The sensitivity of MDCT for PC (≤10 mm) detection was significantly lower than that for PC (11–20 mm) detection (20% vs. 78%; p = 0.001). CH-EUS, compared to MDCT and MRI, is useful for diagnosing small PCs.


Pancreas ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 42 (6) ◽  
pp. 990-995 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kazuki Ueda ◽  
Masahiro Itonaga ◽  
Takeichi Yoshida ◽  
Hiroki Maeda ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 69 (5) ◽  
pp. AB246
Author(s):  
Takuya Ishikawa ◽  
Yoshiki Hirooka ◽  
Akihiro Itoh ◽  
Hiroki Kawashima ◽  
Toshifumi Kasugai ◽  
...  

Pancreatology ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
pp. 103-108 ◽  
Author(s):  
Shin Il Kim ◽  
Jun Young Shin ◽  
Jin-Seok Park ◽  
Seok Jeong ◽  
Yong Sun Jeon ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Zuo Dan ◽  
Feng Yi ◽  
Zhang Qi ◽  
Qiu Yi-Jie ◽  
Tian Xiao-Fan ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To evaluate the feasibility of dynamic contrast enhanced ultrasound (DCE-US) in predicting treatment response of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) lesions. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 10 patients with pathologically confirmed LAPC lesions (7 men, 3 women; average age, 61.13±5.80 years) were prospectively enrolled. All patients received HIFU treatment with peak intensity at 12000 W/cm2. Contrast enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) was performed with an ACUSON Oxana 2 ultrasound equipment and a 6 C-1 transducer (1–6 Hz). A dose of 2.4 ml SonoVue was injected for each examination. Time intensity curves (TICs) were generated and quantitative analyses were performed by SonoLiver software. B mode ultrasound (BMUS) features, CEUS enhancement patterns, TICs, CEUS quantitative parameters and serum carcinoma antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) levels were compared before and 4 weeks after HIFU treatment. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS Version 20.0 and GraphPad Prism 5. RESULTS: While comparing before and after HIFU, no significant difference was obtained on mean size of lesion, BMUS or CEUS features. After HIFU treatment, TICs showed decreased and delayed enhancement. Among all CEUS quantitative parameters, significant decrease could be found in maximum intensity (MI) (60.66±23.95% vs 41.31±26.74%) and mean transit time (mTT) (76.66±47.61 s vs 38.42±28.35 s). CA19-9 level decreased significantly after HIFU (2747.92±4237.41 U/ml vs 715.08±1773.90 U/ml) (P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: DCE-US combining with quantitative analysis might be a useful imaging method for early treatment response evaluation of HIFU in LAPC lesions.


2015 ◽  
Vol 148 (4) ◽  
pp. S-392-S-393
Author(s):  
Shin Il Kim ◽  
Seok Jeong ◽  
Don Haeng Lee ◽  
Hyun Jong Choi ◽  
Jong Ho Moon ◽  
...  

2013 ◽  
Vol 77 (5) ◽  
pp. AB412
Author(s):  
Yasunobu Yamashita ◽  
Kazuki Ueda ◽  
Takashi Tamura ◽  
Masahiro Itonaga ◽  
Takeichi Yoshida ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document