Closing in on an optimal EUS-guided liver biopsy technique… but when should we use it?

2021 ◽  
Vol 94 (3) ◽  
pp. 559-561
Author(s):  
Kevin D. Platt ◽  
Allison R. Schulman
2007 ◽  
Vol 230 (12) ◽  
pp. 1849-1853 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephen J. Hernandez-Divers ◽  
Scott J. Stahl ◽  
Michael McBride ◽  
Nancy L. Stedman

1988 ◽  
Vol 10 (3) ◽  
pp. 145-150
Author(s):  
P. M. van Lith ◽  
Th. A. Niewold ◽  
C. J. M. A. Vandenbooren ◽  
J. H. M. Verheijden ◽  
E. Gruys ◽  
...  

1984 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 87-91 ◽  
Author(s):  
William D. Harvey ◽  
Richard L. Noble ◽  
William H. Neill ◽  
Jon E. Marks

1963 ◽  
Vol 22 (3) ◽  
pp. 733-737 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. L. Chapman ◽  
D. H. Cox ◽  
C. E. Haines ◽  
G. K. Davis

2015 ◽  
Vol 238 (2) ◽  
pp. S251
Author(s):  
S. McPherson ◽  
W. Lei ◽  
C. Barker

1962 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 369-372 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. A. Anderson ◽  
R. E. Taylor ◽  
R. H. Diven ◽  
Farris Hubbert ◽  
W. H. Hale

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (12) ◽  
pp. 6702-6708
Author(s):  
Nicos Fotiadis ◽  
Katja N. De Paepe ◽  
Lawrence Bonne ◽  
Nasir Khan ◽  
Angela Riddell ◽  
...  

Abstract Objectives Percutaneous liver biopsy (PLB) poses specific challenges in oncological patients such as bleeding and tumour seeding. This study’s aim was to compare a coaxial (C-PLB) and non-coaxial (NC-PLB) biopsy technique in terms of diagnostic yield, safety and seeding risk of image-guided PLB techniques in an oncological setting. Methods Local research committee approval was obtained for this single-site retrospective study. Patients who underwent a PLB between November 2011 and December 2017 were consecutively included. Medical records were reviewed to determine diagnostic yield and complications. Follow-up imaging was re-reviewed for seeding, defined as visible tumour deposits along the PLB track. Mann-Whitney U and chi-squared tests were performed to investigate differences between biopsy techniques in sample number, complications and seeding rate. Results In total, 741 patients (62 ± 13 years, 378 women) underwent 932 PLB (C-PLB 72.9% (679/932); NC-PLB 27.1% (253/932)). More tissue cores (p < 0.001) were obtained with C-PLB (median 4 cores; range 1–12) compared with NC-PLB (2 cores; range 1–4) and diagnostic yield was similar for both techniques (C-PLB 92.6% (629/679); NC-PLB 92.5% (234/253); p = 0.940). Complication rate (9.3%; 87/932) using C-PLB (8.2% (56/679)) was lower compared with NC-PLB (12.3% (31/253); p = 0.024). Major complications were uncommon (C-PLB 2.7% (18/679); NC-PLB 2.8% (7/253)); bleeding developed in 1.2% (11/932; C-PLB 1.2% (8/679); NC-PLB 1.2% (3/253)). Seeding was a rare event, occurring significantly less in C-PLB cases (C-PLB 1.3% (7/544); NC-PLB 3.1% (6/197); p = 0.021). Conclusions C-PLB allows for high diagnostic tissue yield with a lower complication and seeding rate than a NC-PLB and should be the preferred method in an oncological setting. Key Points • A coaxial percutaneous liver biopsy achieves a significant higher number of cores and fewer complications than a non-coaxial biopsy technique. • The risk of tumour seeding is very low and is significantly lower using the coaxial biopsy technique. • In this study, a larger number of cores (median = 4) could be safely acquired using the coaxial technique, providing sufficient material for advanced molecular analysis.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document