Clinical Application of a Modified Bone Cement Pusher in Percutaneous Vertebroplasty Combined with Multi-Target Negative Pressure Rotary-Cutting Technique in Puncture Biopsy for Bone Tumors

Purpose To assess the efficiency and safety of a modified bone cement pusher in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with a multi-target negative pressure rotary-cutting technique in puncture biopsy of bone tumors. Methods The biopsy performed with the modified bone cement pusher commonly used in PVP, and a multi-target negative pressure rotary-cutting technique. A total of 120 patients with spinal and pelvic tumors undergoing needle biopsy in our department were recruited and assigned to new biopsy device group (group A, n=60) or and conventional biopsy device group (group B, n=60). The puncture time, positive rate, consistency rate, and dependence rate between group A and B were compared to assess the efficiency and safety of the new device. Results No biopsy-related complications were reported in both groups. The puncture time (39.44±8.885 min vs. 61.61±9.880 min), positive rate (96.67% vs. 61.67%), consistency rate (96.55% vs. 81.8%), and dependence rate (100% vs. 83.33%) were significantly superb in group A compared with those in group B (all P<0.05). Patients in group A did not require repeated biopsies, and sufficient samples were obtained through the needle trajectory in PVP. All patients with a definite diagnosis were managed with appropriate treatments. Conclusions Featuring high safety, positive rate and consistency rate, the new device can be performed to collect sufficient pathological samples from multiple angles. Wide clinical replication can be expected considering its evident diagnostic efficiency for bone tumor.

A real-world study evaluating ultrasound guided percutaneous non-targeted liver biopsy needle failures and pathology sample quality assessment in both end-cut and side-notch needles

Objectives: To determine biopsy device failures, causative factors, complications and sample quality of the 16G end-cut Biopince™ and side-notch Bard™ needles. Methods: All ultrasound-guided non-targeted liver biopsies between 01/01/2016 to 31/12/2018 were included. Operator, device, number of failures, complications and repeat biopsies were recorded. Histopathology samples were reviewed for all cases of needle failure and a group with no failures, and graded “yes/no” for presence of steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis. The pathology slides from these cases were reviewed to assess biopsy sample quality (length and portal tract number). The failure and no-failure groups were compared in terms of device type/ histology and sample quality was compared between the needle types. Results: 1004 patients were included. 93.8% (n = 942) required one needle pass to obtain a sample and 6.2% (n = 62) required >1 pass due to needle failure. Total of 76 needle failures, more with end-cut than side-notch needles (8.7% vs 2.9%) (p < 0.001). No needle failures resulted in complication. The presence of liver fibrosis was associated with fewer needle failures (p = 0.036). The major complication rate was 0.4% (4/1044). A biopsy with >10 portal tracts was obtained in 90.2% of specimens > 20 mm long, compared with 66% of 16–20 mm biopsies and 21% of <16 mm biopsies. The target of >10 portal tracts was achieved in 10/26 (38.5%) of side-notch biopsies and 64/90 (71.1%) of end-cut biopsies (p = 0.004). Conclusion: Ultrasound-guided liver biopsy is safe and sample quality is consistently good when a core >20 mm long is obtained. The end-cut biopsy device generated reliably good quality biopsy samples, however the needle failure rate was significantly higher than the side-cut needle. Advances in knowledge: Ultrasound guided liver biopsy specimen quality is consistently good when a core >20 mm long is obtained which can be achieved with a single pass using the 16G BiopinceTM end-cut needle, although the needle failure rate is significantly higher than the 16G Max-Core™ Bard™ side-notch needle.

Biopince Full Core Biopsy Device for Percutaneous Lung Biopsy: A Retrospective Analysis of 184 Procedures Analyzing Complication Rates and Procedure Success

Background: Unlike fine needle aspiration, core needle biopsies allow the collection of intact tissue for pathological and molecular evaluation. In outpatient clinical practice, full core needle lung biopsy may be underused because of concerns that it might be too dangerous. We describe our experience using a full core device for percutaneous lung biopsy in a large cohort of patients. Research Question: Is percutaneous full core needle lung biopsy effective and safe in the outpatient setting? Study Design and Methods: The analyzed population comprised patients with lung masses >1.1 cm who underwent percutaneous lung biopsy with a full core device. Analyzed data included core mass dimensions, distance from pleural edge to mass, lobe location, type, outcomes, and complications. Biopsy success was defined as adequate tissue acquisition for pathological evaluation that yielded a diagnosis. Biopsy procedures with incomplete data were excluded from this analysis. Results: We analyzed data from 184 lung biopsies performed on 182 patients (mean age, 70±11.7 years). Most biopsies were parenchymal (54.9%). The overall diagnostic success rate was 98.4%. No complications were reported for 77.2% of biopsies. Minor complications occurred during 39 biopsies (21.2%) and were primarily pneumothorax (16.8%). Major complications occurred during 4 biopsies (2.1%): 3 patients with pneumothorax required emergency department (ED) management and 1 patient went to the ED for severe pain. All complications resolved within 24 hours without hospitalization or transfusion. Crosstabulation analyses showed no significant differences between the lung lobe locations in terms of rates of disposition and complications, and between the lesion types in terms of rates of disposition and complications. Interpretation: Percutaneous lung biopsy performed using a full core biopsy device demonstrated a high rate of diagnostic success and a low risk of clinically significant procedural complications in an outpatient setting.

MRI-guided breast biopsy based on diffusion-weighted imaging: a feasibility study

Objectives This study evaluated the feasibility of DWI for lesion targeting in MRI-guided breast biopsies. Furthermore, it assessed device positioning on DWI during biopsy procedures. Methods A total of 87 biopsy procedures (5/87 bilateral) consecutively performed between March 2019 and June 2020 were retrospectively reviewed: in these procedures, a preliminary DWI sequence (b = 1300 s/mm2) was acquired to assess lesion detectability. We included 64/87 procedures on lesions detectable at DWI; DWI sequences were added to the standard protocol to localize lesion and biopsy device and to assess the site marker correct positioning. Results Mass lesions ranged from 5 to 48 mm, with a mean size of 10.7 mm and a median size of 8 mm. Non-mass lesions ranged from 7 to 90 mm, with a mean size of 33.9 mm and a median size of 31 mm. Positioning of the coaxial system was confirmed on both T1-weighted and DWI sequences. At DWI, the biopsy needle was detectable in 62/64 (96.9%) cases; it was not visible in 2/64 (3.1%) cases. The site marker was always identified using T1-weighted imaging; a final DWI sequence was acquired in 44/64 cases (68.8%). In 42/44 cases (95.5%), the marker was recognizable at DWI. Conclusions DWI can be used as a cost-effective, highly reliable technique for targeting both mass and non-mass lesions, with a minimum size of 5 mm, detectable at pre-procedural DWI. DWI is also a feasible technique to localize the biopsy device and to confirm the deployment of the site marker. Key Points • MRI-guided breast biopsy is performed in referral centers by an expert dedicated staff, based on prior MR imaging; contrast agent administration is usually needed for lesion targeting. • DWI represents a feasible, highly reliable technique for lesion targeting, avoiding contrast agent administration. • DWI allows a precise localization of both biopsy needle device and site marker.

Multicentre clinical evaluation of the safety and performance of a simple transperineal access system for prostate biopsies for suspected prostate cancer: The CAMbridge PROstate Biopsy DevicE (CamPROBE) study

Objectives: To report the prospective multicentre clinical evaluation of a first-in-man disposable device, Cambridge Prostate Biopsy Device, to undertake local anaesthetic outpatient transperineal prostate biopsies. Material and methods: Disposable single-use Cambridge Prostate Biopsy devices were manufactured based on a previous prototype. The lead site developed a user training course and disseminated the method to other sites. The Cambridge Prostate Biopsy Device (CamPROBE) was offered as an alternative to transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy to men due for a biopsy as part of their clinical management. Data on safety (infections and device performance), clinical utility, patient reported experience, biopsy quality and cancer detection were collected. Procedure time and local anaesthetic use was recorded in the lead site. The study was funded by a United Kingdom National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) i4i product development award. Results: A total of 40 patients were recruited (median age 69 y) across six sites; five sites were new to the procedure. Overall, 19/40 were first prostate biopsies and 21/40 repeat procedures. Both image-targeted and systematic biopsy cores taken. There were no infections, device deficiencies or safety issues reported. The procedure was well tolerated with excellent patient-reported perception and low pain scores (median of 3, scale 0–10). Histopathology quality was good and the overall cancer diagnosis rate (first diagnostic procedures) was 68% (13/19) and for significant cancers (⩾ histological Grade Group 2), 47% (9/19). In the lead centre (most experienced), median procedure time was 25 minutes, and median local anaesthetic use 11 ml ( n=17). Conclusions: Data from this device evaluation study demonstrate that the United Kingdom-developed Cambridge Prostate Biopsy Device/method for transperineal biopsies is safe, transferable and maintains high diagnostic yields. The procedure is well tolerated by patients, suited to the local anaesthetic outpatient setting and could directly replace transrectal ultrasound guided biopsy. Level of evidence: Level III