scholarly journals Novel MSH2 Mutation in the First Report of a Vietnamese–American Kindred with Lynch Syndrome

2015 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
pp. 31-33
Author(s):  
Ramez N. Eskander ◽  
Henry T. Lynch ◽  
Sandra M. Brown ◽  
Lawrence D. Wagman ◽  
Krishnansu S. Tewari
2008 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 15 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rein P Stulp ◽  
Johanna C Herkert ◽  
Arend Karrenbeld ◽  
Bart Mol ◽  
Yvonne J Vos ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 186-190 ◽  
Author(s):  
M Menéndez ◽  
S Castellví-Bel ◽  
M Pineda ◽  
R De Cid ◽  
J Muñoz ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e22077-e22077
Author(s):  
I. Valenzuela ◽  
J. Balmaña ◽  
M. Rue ◽  
I. Blanco ◽  
A. Torres ◽  
...  

e22077 Background: Different predictive models for Lynch syndrome have recently been developed and their comparative performance in a clinic-based cohort has not been assessed. We aimed to analyze the accuracy of the MMRpro, Barnetson, and PREMM1,2 models to predict MLH1/MSH2 mutation carrier status in 564 unrelated probands with clinical suspicion of hereditary colorectal cancer and compare it with Wijnen model and clinical criteria. Methods: Overall, 538 individuals (95%) underwent mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency screening before germline genetic testing (sequencing with or without large rearrangement analysis) and 26 (5%) performed direct genetic testing. Prediction scores for all individuals were calculated by each model. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and the areas under the receiver operating characteristics curves (AUC) for all models were calculated and compared with the Revised Bethesda Guidelines (RBG). Results: 114 individuals (20%) were mutation carriers (63 MLH1, 51 MSH2). The AUC was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93–0.97) for MMRpro, 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.91) for the Barnetson model, 0.87 (95% CI 0.83–0.91) for PREMM1,2, and 0.75 (95% CI 0.69–0.80) for the Wijnen model (p<0.001). Testing thresholds and specificity at 100% and 90% sensitivity for each model were: 0.001/17% and 0.33/89% for MMRpro, 0.01/9% and 0.07/59% for Barnetson, 0.05/5% and 0.11/58% for PREMM1,2. Sensitivity and specificity of RBG were 86% and 14%, respectively. Calibration was 0.92, 1.05, 0.50, and 1.25 for PREMM1,2,Barnetson, Wijnen, and MMRpro, respectively. Conclusions: In a population of individuals at risk of Lynch syndrome, the MMRpro model has the largest AUC, although the Barnetson and PREMM1,2 model also show adequate discrimination. Any of the models perform better than the RBG and provide quantitative risk estimation of finding a MLH1/MSH2 mutation useful in genetic counselling. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2017 ◽  
Vol 152 (5) ◽  
pp. S552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ariadna Sanchez ◽  
Matilde Navarro ◽  
Teresa Ocaña ◽  
Marta Pineda ◽  
Francisco Rodriguez-Moranta ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-6
Author(s):  
Sarah Azam ◽  
Leomar Y. Ballester ◽  
Shakti H. Ramkissoon ◽  
Sigmund Hsu ◽  
Jay-Jiguang Zhu ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (26) ◽  
pp. 4285-4292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timm Goecke ◽  
Karsten Schulmann ◽  
Christoph Engel ◽  
Elke Holinski-Feder ◽  
Constanze Pagenstecher ◽  
...  

Purpose Lynch syndrome is linked to germline mutations in mismatch repair genes. We analyzed the genotype-phenotype correlations in the largest cohort so far reported. Patients and Methods Following standard algorithms, we identified 281 of 574 unrelated families with deleterious germline mutations in MLH1 (n = 124) or MSH2 (n = 157). A total of 988 patients with 1,381 cancers were included in this analysis. Results We identified 181 and 259 individuals with proven or obligatory and 254 and 294 with assumed MLH1 and MSH2 mutations, respectively. Age at diagnosis was younger both in regard to first cancer (40 v 43 years; P < .009) and to first colorectal cancer (CRC; 41 v 44 years; P = .004) in MLH1 (n = 435) versus MSH2 (n = 553) mutation carriers. In both groups, rectal cancers were remarkably frequent, and the time span between first and second CRC was smaller if the first primary occurred left sided. Gastric cancer was the third most frequent malignancy occurring without a similarly affected relative in most cases. All prostate cancers occurred in MSH2 mutation carriers. Conclusion The proportion of rectal cancers and shorter time span to metachronous cancers indicates the need for a defined treatment strategy for primary rectal cancers in hereditary nonpolyposis colorectal cancer patients. Male MLH1 mutation carriers require earlier colonoscopy beginning at age 20 years. We propose regular gastric surveillance starting at age 35 years, regardless of the familial occurrence of this cancer. The association of prostate cancer with MSH2 mutations should be taken into consideration both for clinical and genetic counseling practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document