scholarly journals Prominent decidualization following progestin treatment for endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma as a mimic of large residual tumor: A cautionary tale

2021 ◽  
Vol 36 ◽  
pp. 100747
Author(s):  
Yang Hu ◽  
Ahmed N. Al-Niaimi ◽  
Alain Cagaanan ◽  
Elizabeth A. Sadowski ◽  
David M. Kushner ◽  
...  
Author(s):  
Lisa K. Nees ◽  
Sabine Heublein ◽  
Sahra Steinmacher ◽  
Ingolf Juhasz-Böss ◽  
Sara Brucker ◽  
...  

AbstractEndometrial hyperplasia (EH) is the precursor lesion for endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the endometrium (EC), which represents the most common malignancy of the female reproductive tract in industrialized countries. The most important risk factor for the development of EH is chronic exposure to unopposed estrogen. Histopathologically, EH can be classified into EH without atypia (benign EH) and atypical EH/endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia (EIN). Clinical management ranges from surveillance or progestin therapy through to hysterectomy, depending on the risk of progression to or concomitant EC and the patient´s desire to preserve fertility. Multiple studies support the efficacy of progestins in treating both benign and atypical EH. This review summarizes the evidence base regarding risk factors and management of EH. Additionally, we performed a systematic literature search of the databases PubMed and Cochrane Controlled Trials register for studies analyzing the efficacy of progestin treatment in women with EH.


2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (4) ◽  
pp. 604-610
Author(s):  
O. Gromova ◽  
V. Potapov ◽  
D. Hasachih ◽  
O. Haponova ◽  
G. Kukina

Annotation. Non-atypical endometrial hyperplasia (NEH), despite of benign morphology, may be insensitive to the hormonal treatment and has a tendency to recurrence and progression to atypia in some cases. The study purpose was the investigation of different type of progestins treatment results and comparison of progesterone receptors (PGR) and Е-cadherin expression in the sensitive NEH(+) and resistant NEH(–) to progestin treatment type of NEH. Prospective study of three groups of women with histologically confirmed NEH, who took different progestins during 6 months was done: І group – 96 women, who took micronized progesterone orally 200 mg per day continually, ІІ group – 161 women, who took dydrogesterone 20 mg per day continually, ІІІ group – 54 women, who were inserted LNG-IUD 52 mg. Control histopathological investigations of the endometrial samplings at 3 and 6 months were done. Expression of PGR and Е-cadherin by immunohistochemistry were investigated in the start samples of endometrium for all 63 NEH(–) women, 48 NEH(+) women and 20 control samples of normal proliferative and secretory endometrium. In the result of the study only nonsignificant and unreliable differences between different progestins efficacy were found. It was 75% normal endometrium samples till 6 months for micronized progesterone, 81.4% for dydrogesterone and 83.3% for LNG-IUD. Data analysis of PGR expression in the NEH(–) endometrium has shown significantly less week expression as for glandular cells (50.82±0.73), as for stromal cells (47.34±0.82) in comparison to the NEH(+) endometrial samples (glandular – 183.7±3.1; stroma 166.4±2.3; р<0.05) and normal proliferative (193.2±8.5 і 178.7±6.3 respectively; р<0.05) and secretory (140.2±4,4 і 116.6±3,1 respectively; р<0.05) endometrium. Е-cadherin expression in the glandular endometrial cells NEH(–) mostly was negative (86.4%) and 13.6% cells only demonstrated its week expression. NEH(+) women cells predominantly showed a positive reaction. It was often enough week (49.2%) and moderate (34.4%), but only in the 16.4% samples were negative. Thus, the use of progestogens for the treatment of NEH in women with low expression of PGR and negative expression of E-cadherin in the endometrium is inappropriate. Investigations of PGR та Е-cadherin expression in the endometrium of women with NEH before starting treatment may provide an opportunity to predict negative result in advance and chose alternative therapeutical approach.


2003 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gerard J. Solan ◽  
Jean M. Casey

Author(s):  
Mariam Hull ◽  
Mered Parnes

AbstractTic disorders are common, affecting approximately 0.5 to 1% of children and adolescents. Treatment is required only when symptoms are bothersome or impairing to the patient, so many do not require intervention. However, on occasion tics may cause significant morbidity and are referred to as “malignant.” These malignant tics have resulted in cervical myelopathy, subdural hematoma secondary to head banging, biting of lips leading to infection of oral muscles, self-inflicted eye injuries leading to blindness, skeletal fractures, compressive neuropathies, and vertebral artery dissection. We describe a case of malignant tic disorder, with accompanying video segment, resulting in cervical myelopathy and quadriparesis in a child. We also discuss aggressive management strategies for neurologists to prevent potential lifelong disability. This case emphasizes that these malignant tics must be treated with all due haste to prevent such complications.


2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leighton Seal ◽  
Iffy Middleton ◽  
James Barrett

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document