Integration of Rapid Molecular Diagnostics into Clinical Decision Making during Ex Vivo Lung Perfusion

2020 ◽  
Vol 39 (4) ◽  
pp. S112-S113
Author(s):  
A.T. Sage ◽  
B.T. Chao ◽  
X. Bai ◽  
M. Liu ◽  
M. Cypel ◽  
...  
2018 ◽  
Vol 230 (06) ◽  
pp. 305-313 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heidi Bächli ◽  
Jonas Ecker ◽  
Cornelis van Tilburg ◽  
Dominik Sturm ◽  
Florian Selt ◽  
...  

AbstractCentral nervous system (CNS) tumors account for the highest mortality among pediatric malignancies. Accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal clinical management. The increasing use of molecular diagnostics has opened up novel possibilities for more precise classification of CNS tumors. We here report a single-institutional collection of pediatric CNS tumor cases that underwent a refinement or a change of diagnosis after completion of molecular analysis that affected clinical decision-making including the application of molecularly informed targeted therapies. 13 pediatric CNS tumors were analyzed by conventional histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular diagnostics including DNA methylation profiling in 12 cases, DNA sequencing in 8 cases and RNA sequencing in 3 cases. 3 tumors had a refinement of diagnosis upon molecular testing, and 6 tumors underwent a change of diagnosis. Targeted therapy was initiated in 5 cases. An underlying cancer predisposition syndrome was detected in 5 cases. Although this case series, retrospective and not population based, has its limitations, insight can be gained regarding precision of diagnosis and clinical management of the patients in selected cases. Accuracy of diagnosis was improved in the cases presented here by the addition of molecular diagnostics, impacting clinical management of affected patients, both in the first-line as well as in the follow-up setting. This additional information may support the clinical decision making in the treatment of challenging pediatric CNS tumors. Prospective testing of the clinical value of molecular diagnostics is currently underway.


2018 ◽  
Vol 64 ◽  
pp. 34-41 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ronan T. Swords ◽  
Diana Azzam ◽  
Hassan Al-Ali ◽  
Ines Lohse ◽  
Claude-Henry Volmar ◽  
...  

2011 ◽  
Vol 20 (4) ◽  
pp. 121-123
Author(s):  
Jeri A. Logemann

Evidence-based practice requires astute clinicians to blend our best clinical judgment with the best available external evidence and the patient's own values and expectations. Sometimes, we value one more than another during clinical decision-making, though it is never wise to do so, and sometimes other factors that we are unaware of produce unanticipated clinical outcomes. Sometimes, we feel very strongly about one clinical method or another, and hopefully that belief is founded in evidence. Some beliefs, however, are not founded in evidence. The sound use of evidence is the best way to navigate the debates within our field of practice.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document