scholarly journals 475 Direct Oral Anticoagulant Therapy Versus Low-Molecular Weight Heparin for the Treatment of Venous Thrombo-Embolism Associated With Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 29 ◽  
pp. S251
Author(s):  
A. Murphy ◽  
A. Koshy ◽  
O. Farouque ◽  
M. Yudi
VASA ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 39 (3) ◽  
pp. 243-248 ◽  
Author(s):  
Klamroth ◽  
Gottstein ◽  
Essers ◽  
Landgraf

Background: Low molecular weight heparin is widely used during the interruption of long-term oral anticoagulation in patients undergoing surgery. The optimal dose is still a matter of debate. The 8th ACCP Guidelines primarily recommend therapeutic-dose or low-dose low molecular weight heparin after stratification of the thromboembolic risk. We investigated the efficacy and safety of a standardized bridging therapy with enoxaparin in a half-therapeutic dose in patients with a target INR of 2,0 to 3,0. Patients and methods: In our prospective registry we studied 198 consecutive patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy with phenprocuomon and a planned surgery. Phenprocoumon was stopped 7 days before surgery and after reaching an INR less than 2,0 all patients received enoxaparin in a half-therapeutic dose (1 × 1 mg / kg body weight (bw)/day) until the day before surgery. Enoxaparin was continued with the same dose split into 2 × 0,5 mg / kg bw / day after the procedure. Phenprocoumon was resumed within day 1 to 14 after surgery depending on the bleeding risk as determined by the surgeon. All patients were followed up for 28 days after surgery. Results: Major surgery was performed in 148 patients (75 %). 175 patients (88 % of the total) had an intermediate thromboembolic risk. On average, enoxaparin was administered for 19,5 days. One patient (0,5 %) experienced arterial thrombosis after surgery, and one patient (0,5 %) required a second surgical intervention due to severe bleeding. Conclusions: In patients receiving oral anticoagulant therapy with a target INR of 2,0-3,0 and at an intermediate risk of thromboembolic events who require interruption of oral anticoagulant therapy a half therapeutic dose of enoxaparin seems to be safe and effective for bridging.


2018 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 793-800 ◽  
Author(s):  
Megan K Phelps ◽  
Tracy E Wiczer ◽  
H Paige Erdeljac ◽  
Kelsey R Van Deusen ◽  
Kyle Porter ◽  
...  

Introduction Low-molecular-weight heparins are the standard treatment for cancer-associated thrombosis. Recently, direct oral anticoagulants are a new option for thrombosis treatment; however, data supporting the use of direct oral anticoagulants for cancer-associated thrombosis are limited. Objectives The primary objective of this study was to determine the rate of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis and major bleeding within 6 months of starting either low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant for treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis. Secondary objectives were to determine the rates of clinically relevant-non-major bleeding and all-cause mortality. Patients/methods This is a retrospective cohort study including adults with cancer-associated thrombosis treated with low-molecular-weight heparin or direct oral anticoagulant between 2010 and 2016 at the Ohio State University. Medical records were reviewed for 6 months after initiation of anticoagulation or until the occurrence of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis, major bleeding, cessation of anticoagulation of interest, or death, whichever occurred first. Results Four hundred and eighty patients were included (290 low-molecular-weight heparin and 190 direct oral anticoagulant). Patients treated with direct oral anticoagulant were found to carry “lower risk” features including cancer with lower VTE risk and lower rate of metastatic disease. After adjustment for baseline differences, there was no significant difference in the rate of recurrent cancer-associated thrombosis (7.2% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 6.3% direct oral anticoagulant, p = 0.71) or major bleeding (7.6% low-molecular-weight heparin vs 2.6% direct oral anticoagulant, p = 0.08). Conclusions Our study demonstrates that in a select population of cancer patients with VTE, direct oral anticoagulant use can be as effective and safe compared to the standard therapy with low-molecular-weight heparin.


Author(s):  
Daniele Santini ◽  
Fabrizio Citarella ◽  
Bruno Vincenzi ◽  
Marco Russano ◽  
Giuseppe Tonini ◽  
...  

Abstract The use of direct oral anticoagulant in cancer patients is an emerging issue, which seems to be an alternative to low molecular weight heparin. Every year several new drugs are approved as anticancer treatment with possible drug-drug interaction with other drugs such as oral anticoagulant. We describe, for the first time, a case of neutropenia and thrombocytopenia in a patient in treatment with cabozantinib, a novel anticancer treatment used in metastatic renal cell carcinoma, and apixaban with promptly resumption of the toxicity after the interruption of cabozantinib. This case suggest a possible interaction between these two pharmaceutical agents, which merit caution considering the spreading of the two drugs.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document