The Challenges of diagnosis and management of acute mesenteric venous thrombosis in patients with liver cirrhosis: a single institution's experience

Background: Acute mesenteric venous thrombosis (MVT) is a dreadful complication of liver cirrhosis that requires prompt diagnosis and aggressive management for better outcome. The aim of this work was to study the diagnostic tools and the optimal management of acute MVT in patients with liver cirrhosis.Methods: It was a retrospective study including 40 patients with liver cirrhosis who were admitted to the surgical emergency and were eventually diagnosed as acute MVT between May 2011 to September 2016. The preoperative clinicopathological data, operative data and postoperative follow up were recorded.Results: Forty patients had acute MVT. Twenty five patients (62.5%) had prolonged prothrombin time, 18 patients (45%) had thrombocytopenia and 22 patients (55%) had low protein C. triphasic CT scan was the main diagnostic image in 28 patients, with sensitivity 100% and accuracy 96.9% in detection of intestinal infarction. Ten patients (25%) underwent conservative treatment with anticoagulant, while 30 patients (75%) were surgically explored and 28 patients of them had gangrenous bowel loops and underwent primary resection and anastomosis. Three patients underwent second look operation. Three patients had recurrent symptoms after 1 month of the first presentation. The overall 30- and 90-day mortality was 27.5% and 37.5% respectively.Conclusions: Cirrhotic patients may have hypercoagulable state and the usual laboratory tests don’t accurately assess the coagulation status in these patient. Acute MVT in cirrhotic patients has a high early morbidity and mortality that needs early diagnosis and urgent management with selective surgical intervention and proper anticoagulant.

Download Full-text

Acute Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis: A Better Outcome Achieved Through Improved Imaging Techniques and a Changed Policy of Clinical Management

Yearbook of Vascular Surgery ◽

10.1016/s0749-4041(08)70269-0 ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 2006 ◽

pp. 350-351

Author(s):

G.L. Moneta

Keyword(s):

Venous Thrombosis ◽

Clinical Management ◽

Imaging Techniques ◽

Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis

Download Full-text

CT diagnosis of traumatic mesenteric venous thrombosis.

American Journal of Roentgenology ◽

10.2214/ajr.154.2.2105044 ◽

1990 ◽

Vol 154 (2) ◽

pp. 425-425 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

M D Salerno ◽

B S Rose

Keyword(s):

Venous Thrombosis ◽

Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis ◽

Ct Diagnosis

Download Full-text

A systematic review and meta-analysis on endovascular treatment as an attractive alternative for acute superior mesenteric venous thrombosis

Vascular ◽

10.1177/1708538121991270 ◽

2021 ◽

pp. 170853812199127

Author(s):

Lixin Wang ◽

Enci Wang ◽

Fei Liu ◽

Wei Zhang ◽

Xiaolong Shu ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Systematic Review ◽

Treatment Group ◽

Conservative Treatment ◽

Venous Thrombosis ◽

Endovascular Treatment ◽

Meta Analysis ◽

Statistical Significance ◽

Published Data ◽

Mesenteric Venous Thrombosis ◽

Surgery Group

Objective This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the published data on the efficacy and safety of therapies for superior mesenteric venous thrombosis (SMVT), aiming to provide a reference and set of recommendations for clinical treatment. Methods Relevant databases were searched for studies published from 2000 to June 2020 on SMVT treated with conservative treatment, surgical treatment, or endovascular approach. Different treatment types were grouped for analysis and comparison, and odds ratios with corresponding 95% confidence intervals were calculated. The outcomes were pooled using meta-analytic methods and presented by forest plots. Results Eighteen articles, including eight on SMVT patients treated with endovascular therapies, were enrolled. The treatment effectiveness was compared between different groups according to the change of symptoms, the occurrence of complications, and mortality as well. The conservative treatment group had better efficacy compared to the surgery group (89.0% vs. 78.6%, P <0.05), and the one-year survival rate was also higher (94.4% vs. 80.0%, P >0.05), but without statistical significance. As for endovascular treatment, the effectiveness was significantly higher than the surgery group (94.8% vs. 75.2%, P <0.05), and the conservative treatment group as well (93.3% vs. 86.3%, P >0.05), which still requires further research for the lack of statistical significance. Conclusions Present findings indicate that anticoagulation, as conservative treatment should be the preferred clinical option in the clinic for SMVT, due to its better curative effect compared to other treatment options, including lower mortality, fewer complications, and better prognosis. Moreover, endovascular treatment is a feasible and promising approach that is worth in-depth research, for it is less invasive than surgery and has relatively better effectiveness, thus can provide an alternative option for SMVT treatment and may be considered as a reliable method in clinical.

Download Full-text