Impact of surgical intensive care unit interdisciplinary rounds on interprofessional collaboration and quality of care: Mixed qualitative–quantitative study

2018 ◽  
Vol 44 ◽  
pp. 18-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tatiana Urisman ◽  
Alberto Garcia ◽  
Hobart W. Harris
Author(s):  
Nicholas J. Napoli ◽  
William Barnhardt ◽  
Jeffrey Young ◽  
Laura Barnes

For decades, emergency departments have become increasingly unable to meet escalating patient demands. In order to allow emergency departments to operate beyond their designed capacity, major efforts have gone into improving their work-flow, efficiency, and quality of care. Many studies have show that inefficiencies and error in a clinical setting are linked to communications. As a means to improve the quality of care for trauma patients, this study examines the present communication systems for different admission pathways to the University of Virginia’s Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) and recommends a new design for critical operations. The evaluation and analysis of this new design will identify critical factors, including potential communication modalities, implementation details, potential key clinician roles, and in which processes the new system will be useful. Our objective is to design a real-time communication infrastructure for operations within a critical care unit by an informed design process.


2012 ◽  
Vol 73 (1) ◽  
pp. 202-208 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marvin Allan McMillen ◽  
Nathan Boucher ◽  
David Keith ◽  
David Scott Gould ◽  
Asaf Gave ◽  
...  

2012 ◽  
Vol 21 (6) ◽  
pp. e120-e128 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. K. Timmers ◽  
M. H. J. Verhofstad ◽  
K. G. M. Moons ◽  
L. P. H. Leenen

Background Readmission within 48 hours is a leading performance indicator of the quality of care in an intensive care unit. Objective To investigate variables that might be associated with readmission to a surgical intensive care unit. Methods Demographic characteristics, severity-of-illness scores, and survival rates were collected for all patients admitted to a surgical intensive care unit between 1995 and 2000. Long-term survival and quality of life were determined for patients who were readmitted within 30 days after discharge from the unit. Quality of life was measured with the EuroQol-6D questionnaire. Multivariate logistic analysis was used to calculate the independent association of expected covariates. Results Mean follow-up time was 8 years. Of the 1682 patients alive at discharge, 141 (8%) were readmitted. The main causes of readmission were respiratory decompensation (48%) and cardiac conditions (16%). Compared with the total sample, patients readmitted were older, mostly had vascular (39%) or gastrointestinal (26%) disease, and had significantly higher initial severity of illness (P = .003, .007) and significantly more comorbid conditions (P = .005). For all surgical classifications except general surgery, readmission was independently associated with type of admission and need for mechanical ventilation. Long-term mortality was higher among patients who were readmitted than among the total sample. Nevertheless, quality-of-life scores were the same for patients who were readmitted and patients who were not. Conclusion The adverse effect of readmission to the intensive care unit on survival appears to be long-lasting, and predictors of readmission are scarce.


2007 ◽  
Vol 63 (6) ◽  
pp. 1210-1214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Randall S. Friese ◽  
Ramon Diaz-Arrastia ◽  
Dara McBride ◽  
Heidi Frankel ◽  
Larry M. Gentilello

2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando J Abelha ◽  
Cristina C Santos ◽  
Paula C Maia ◽  
Maria A Castro ◽  
Henrique Barros

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document