scholarly journals Randomised trials and meta-analyses of double vs triple antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation-ACS/PCI: A critical appraisal

2020 ◽  
Vol 28 ◽  
pp. 100524 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Galli ◽  
Felicita Andreotti ◽  
Domenico D'Amario ◽  
Rocco Vergallo ◽  
Rocco A. Montone ◽  
...  
Circulation ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 139 (6) ◽  
pp. 775-786 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nienke van Rein ◽  
Uffe Heide-Jørgensen ◽  
Willem M. Lijfering ◽  
Olaf M. Dekkers ◽  
Henrik T. Sørensen ◽  
...  

EP Europace ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (4) ◽  
pp. 538-546 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Galli ◽  
Felicita Andreotti ◽  
Italo Porto ◽  
Filippo Crea

Abstract Aims  To assess the efficacy-safety profile of dual antithrombotic therapy (DAT) including direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) vs. triple antithrombotic therapy (TAT) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and acute coronary syndrome (ACS) or undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods and results Randomized trials of AF patients with ACS/PCI, comparing DAT using DOACs against TAT, were selected. Overall, 11 161 studies were screened, 458 trials assessed, and four included, comprising 10 234 patients followed for a mean of 11 months. DAT compared to TAT resulted in significant reductions of trial-defined primary safety outcome [odds ratio (OR) 0.63, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.50–0.79, number needed to treat (NNT) 17] and of thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) major bleeding (OR 0.54, 95% CI 0.41–0.70, NNT 76) and in a numerical reduction of intracranial haemorrhage (OR 0.50, 95% CI 0.21–1.19, NNT 314), which became significant after exclusion of DOACs from TAT and vitamin K antagonist from DAT arms (OR 0.31, 95% CI 0.15–0.64). There were no significant differences in the risks of cardiovascular or any deaths or stroke, but with DAT, there was a numerical increase in myocardial infarctions (MIs) (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.99–1.54, estimated NNT for an additional harmful outcome (NNTH) 151), which became significant in the ACS/PCI subgroup (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.02–2.00), and a 60% significant increase in stent thrombosis risk (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.02–2.52; NNTH 274). Conclusion  Dual antithrombotic therapy, compared to TAT, conferred a significantly reduced risk of overall bleeding but with a significant increase of stent thrombosis risk in the overall population and a significant 43% increase of MI in the ACS/PCI subgroup.


Kardiologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 60 (7) ◽  
pp. 53-63
Author(s):  
N. A. Sycheva ◽  
L. Yu. Koroleva ◽  
V. P. Nosov ◽  
G. V. Kovaleva ◽  
N. N. Paikova ◽  
...  

Aim To study efficacy and safety of a triple antithrombotic therapy with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) versus warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation after acute coronary syndrome, for 12 months following discharge from the hospital.Materials and methods This single-site cohort, prospective, observational study performed at the Regional Vascular Center 2 of the N.A. Semashko Nizhniy Novgorod Regional Clinical Hospital included 402 patients. It was possible to maintain contacts with 206 patients for 12 months. These patients were divided into two groups, the DOAC treatment (n=105) and the warfarin treatment (n=101) as a part of triple antithrombotic therapy upon discharge. Clinical observation was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the discharge by structured telephone interview. Predetermined efficacy endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stent thrombosis, and ischemic stroke. Safety endpoints included bleeding defined as small, medium (clinically significant), and major in accordance with the TIMI classification.Results At 12 months of follow-up, 80 patients (76.19%) continued taking DOAC and 39 patients (38.61%, p<0.001) continued taking warfarin; in this process, only 25 patients (24.75%) monitored their INR on a regular basis. With a regular INR monitoring and TTR >70%, death rate did not differ in the warfarin and the DOAC treatment groups. However, there was a difference in reaching the composite efficacy endpoint (p=0.048): ischemic events occurred statistically significantly more frequently in the warfarin treatment group than in the DOAC treatment group.Conclusions In 12 months after discharge from the hospital, compliance with the DOAC treatment as a part of the antithrombotic therapy was significantly higher than compliance with the warfarin treatment. The triple antithrombotic therapy with DOAC was safer than the warfarin treatment by the number of hemorrhagic complications and more effective in prevention of ischemic events, primarily due to no need for monitoring of lab test values.


2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
B Hudzik ◽  
A Desperak ◽  
B Freedman ◽  
P B Nielsen ◽  
T B Larsen ◽  
...  

Abstract Introduction Much of the morbidity and mortality associated with atrial fibrillation (AF) is due to cerebrovascular thrombo-embolic complications such as ischemic stroke. Antithrombotic therapy is the fundamental treatment for many cardiovascular conditions, e.g. coronary artery disease (CAD), AF, and stroke to prevent thrombotic complications and death, but many patients have both CAD and AF. Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) and a P2Y12 inhibitor has proven most effective in patients with recent myocardial infarction (MI) or after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), whereas for AF, oral anticoagulation (OAC) is most effective, with lesser efficacy but similar bleeding using DAPT. We investigated temporal trends in stroke prevalence and its associations with changing patterns of antithrombotic regimens in patients with non-valvular AF and a wide spectrum of co-incident CAD. Methods The Silesian TRiplE Antithrombotic Therapy (TREAT) Registry enrolled 14,873 patients with CAD from 2006 to 2014: 9,379 with stable CAD (SCAD), 1,460 with unstable angina (UA), 1,760 with NSTEMI and 2,328 with STEMI. We compared temporal trends in clinical features, an incidence of clinical events and patterns of antithrombotic regimens. Results 2,194 of 14,873 patients (14.6%) had AF, including 74.1% with SCAD, 7.7% with UA, 10.1% with NSTEMI and 8.1% with STEMI. The AF prevalence increased from 11.2% in 2006 to 17.2% in 2014 which may be attributed to increasing age from 62.7 in 2006 to 67.8 in 2014. Overall, there was an increasing use of OAC therapy alone or with SAPT or DAPT from 46–50% in 2006–7 to 77–86%% in 2013–14. There was a steady increase in utilization of TREAT, and OAC ± SAPT throughout the study period (Panel A): after PCI there was a substantial increase in TREAT with a steady decline in DAPT (Panel B). The stroke rates declined throughout the study period from 3.3% in 2004 through a peak of 4.9% in 2011 to 1.1% in 2014. Conversely, bleeding rates increased from 6.0% to 10.5%. Conclusions There has been an increase followed by a progressive decline in stroke rate despite increasing age and AF prevalence in patients with both CAD and AF. This phenomenon is associated with a significant increase in the proportion of AF patients receiving guideline-recommended OAC therapy, driven by a steady increase in the utilization of triple antithrombotic therapy in patients following ACS or stent implantation and increase in OAC monotherapy in patients without ACS or stent implantation. This positive effect on stroke incidence is offset by increased bleeding risk, necessitating a closer look at the duration of triple therapy for ACS or PCI, and the long-term requirement for additional antiplatelet treatment in uncomplicated CAD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document