Disaster communication ecology and community resilience perceptions following the 2013 central Illinois tornadoes

2016 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
pp. 154-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Spialek ◽  
Heidi M. Czlapinski ◽  
J. Brian Houston
2021 ◽  
pp. 000276422199281
Author(s):  
Mildred F. Perreault ◽  
Gregory P. Perreault

In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, journalists have the challenging task of gathering and distributing accurate information. Journalists exist as a part of an ecology in which their work influences and is influenced by the environment that surrounds it. Using the framework of disaster communication ecology, this study explores the discursive construction of journalism during the COVID-19 crisis. To understand this process in the field of journalism, we unpacked discourses concerning the coronavirus pandemic collected from interviews with journalists during the pandemic and from the U.S. journalism trade press using the Discourses of Journalism Database. Through discourse analysis, we discovered that during COVID-19 journalists discursively placed themselves in a responsible but vulnerable position within the communication ecology—not solely as a result of the pandemic but also from environmental conditions that long preceded it. Journalists found their reporting difficult during the pandemic and sought to mitigate the forces challenging their work as they sought to reverse the flow of misinformation.


2021 ◽  
pp. 185-202
Author(s):  
Dennis John F. Sumaylo ◽  
Marianne D. Sison

2021 ◽  
pp. 000276422199282 ◽  
Author(s):  
Wenlin Liu ◽  
Weiai (Wayne) Xu ◽  
Burton John

Interagency coordination is crucial for effective multiagency disaster management. Viewing government and emergency management organizations as vital components of citizens’ disaster communication ecology, this study examines how a group of Texas-based public health departments and emergency management offices engaged in interagency coordination during different phases of the COVID-19 pandemic. By analyzing coronavirus-related agency tweets between early February and the end of August 2020, the study assesses two types of interagency coordination: (1) content-level coordination in the form of semantic similarity among the selected public agencies serving different jurisdictions and (2) relational-level coordination in terms of referencing common stakeholders through retweeting coronavirus-related information. Using a granular, four-stage construct of a crisis, results identify stage-based variation with regard to peer-to-peer and federal-to-local coordination. We conclude with theoretical and practical implications for communication ecology and disaster management.


2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew L. Spialek ◽  
J. Brian Houston

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document